Recent research on migrant settlement shows that women play an important role in consolidating migrant households and facilitating permanent settlement in migrant sites. Other studies demonstrate that government policies and legislation also determine the contours of migrant communities. A case study of a Maya migrant community in Cancún, Mexico, shows that state policies and the economic systems associated with an international tourist industry restrict the actual process of settlement to men and women who enter into a marriage contract, replicate the model of the “nuclear family,” and demonstrate good citizenship. This case suggests that the global economy and state policies play a key role in reifying gender relations in migrant communities.
Abrams, Philip1988 “Notes on the difficulty of studying the state .” Journal of Historical Sociology1(1): 58—79. Baitenmann , Helga1997 “ Rural agency and state formation in post-revolutionary Mexico: the agrarian reform in Central Veracruz (1915—1992).” Ph.D. diss., New School for Social Research.
2.
Botey, Carlota1998 “Mujer rural: Reforma agraria y contrarreforma,” pp. 95—154 in JosefinaAranda, Carlota Botey, and Rosario Robles (eds.), Tiempo de crisis, tiempo de mujeres. Oaxaca: Universidad Autónoma Benito Juárez de Oaxaca, Centro de Estudios de la Cuestión Agraria Mexicana A.C.
3.
Castellanos, M. Bianet2007 “Adolescent migration to Cancún: reconfiguring Maya households and gender relations in Mexico's Yucatán Peninsula.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women's Studies28: 1—27.
4.
Chavez, Leo1991 “Outside the imagined community: undocumented settlers and experiences of incorporation.” American Ethnologist18: 257—278.
5.
Cornelius, Wayne1975Politics and the Migrant Poor in Mexico City. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
6.
Deere, Carmen Diana and Magdalena León2001Empowering Women: Land and Property Rights in Latin America . Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 2002 “ Individual versus collective land rights: tensions between women's and indigenous rights under neoliberalism ,” pp. 53—86 in Jacquelyn Chase (ed.), The Spaces of Neoliberalism: Land, Place, and Family in Latin America. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
7.
Eckstein, Susan Eva1977The Poverty of Revolution: The State and the Urban Poor in Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8.
Gilbert, Alan and Ann Varley1991Landlord and Tenant: Housing the Poor in Urban Mexico . London: Routledge.
9.
González Montes, Soledad1988 “La reproducción de la desigüaldad entre los sexos: prácticas e ideología de la herencia en una comunidad campesina (Xalatlaco, Estado de México, 1920—1960),” pp. 65—81 in Josefina Aranda Bezaury (ed.), Las mujeres en el campo. Oaxaca: Universidad Autónoma Benito Júarez de Oaxaca .
10.
Gupta, Akhil1995 “Blurred boundaries: the discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state.” American Ethnologist22: 375—402.
11.
Hagan, Jacqueline María1994Deciding to Be Legal: A Maya Community in Houston . Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
12.
Holston, James and Arjun Appadurai1999 “Introduction: cities and citizenship,” pp. 2—18 in James Holston (ed.), Cities and Citizenship. Durham: Duke University Press.
13.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette1994Gendered Transitions: Mexican Experiences of Immigration . Berkeley: University of California Press. 1999 “Introduction: gender and contemporary U.S. immigration.” American Behavioral Scientist42: 565—576.
14.
INEGI (Instítuto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática)2000Cuaderno estadístico municipal, Edición 1999: Benito Juárez, Estado de Quintana Roo. Mexico City . 2001 XII Censo general de población y vivienda . Mexico City.
15.
La Revista Peninsular2000 “ Reserva territorial y su urbanización,” Semanario de Información y Análisis Político 562. http://www.larevista.com.mx.
16.
Malkin, Victoria2004 “`We go to get ahead': gender and status in two Mexican migrant communities.” Latin American Perspectives31(5): 75—99.
17.
Mummert, Gail1994 “ From metate to despate: rural Mexican women's salaried labor and the redefinition of gendered spaces and roles,” pp. 192—209 in Heather Fowler-Salamini and Mary Kay Vaughn (eds.), Women and the Mexican Countryside , 1850—1990. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
18.
Pessar, Patricia1999 “Engendering migration studies: the case of new immigrants in the United States.” American Behavioral Scientist42: 577—600.
19.
Re Cruz, Alicia1996The Two Milpas of Chan Kom: A Study of Socioeconomic and Political Transformation in a Maya Community. Albany : State University of New York Press.
20.
Robichaux, David1988 “Hombre, mujer y la tenencia de la tierra en una comunidad de habla náhuatl de Tlaxcala,” pp. 83—100 in Josefina Aranda Bezaury (ed.), Las mujeres en el campoOaxaca: Universidad Autónoma Benito Júarez de Oaxaca.
21.
Rouse, Roger C.1992 “Making sense of settlement: class transformation among Mexican migrants in the United States,” pp. 25—52 in Nina Glick Schiller, Linda Basch, and Cristina Blanc-Szanton (eds.), Towards a Transnational Perspective on Migration: Race, Class, Ethnicity, and Nationalism Reconsidered. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
22.
Stephen, Lynn1996 “Too little, too late? The impact of Article 27 on women in Oaxaca,” pp. 289—303 in Laura Randall (ed.), Reforming Mexico's Agrarian Reform. New York: M. E. Sharpe. 1997Women and Social Movements in Latin America: Power from Below. Austin: University of Texas Press.
23.
Trouillot, Michel-Rolph2001 “The anthropology of the state in the age of globalization: close encounters of the deceptive kind.” Current Anthropology42: 125—138.
24.
Villagómez, Gina and Wilbert Pinto1997Mujer maya y desarrollo rural en Yucatán. Mérida: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán.
25.
Ward, Peter M.1982 “Introduction and purpose,” pp. 1—13 in Peter M. Ward (ed.), Self-Help Housing: A Critique. London: Mansell Publishing.
26.
Wilson, Tamar Diana1993 “We seek work where we can: a comparison of patterns of transnational outmigration from a rancho in Jalisco and internal migration into a Mexicali squatter settlement.” Journal of Borderland Studies8(2): 33—58.
