Gender ideologies and race and nationality among employers and employees are important in reproducing migrant Mexican workers' status in a segmented U.S. labor market. A survey of 110 employers combined with interviews shows how gender, race, and nationality are reproduced within and outside of the workplace. Employers prefer Mexican workers because of what they feel is a stronger work ethic among recent immigrants, but these preferences are influenced by preexisting ideas about native-born and black workers. Immigrant men are seen as “providers” while Mexican women are seen as good, docile workers except when they have “domestic” issues such as families.
Alonso, Ana Maria1992 “Work and gusto: gender and re-creation in a North Mexican pueblo,” pp. 164—185 in John Calagione, Doris Francis, and Daniel Nugent (eds.), Workers' Expressions: Beyond Accommodation and Resistance. Albany: SUNY Press.
2.
Bagguley, Paul, Jane Mark-Lawson, Dan Shapiro, John Urry, Sylvia Walby, and Alan Warde (eds.) 1990Restructuring: Place, Class, and Gender. Newbury Park: Sage.
3.
Benería, Lourdes and Catharine R. Stimpson (eds.) 1987Women, Households, and the Economy. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
4.
Brodkin, Karen2000 “Global capitalism: What's race got to do with it? ” American Ethnologist27: 237—256.
5.
Burawoy, Michael1975 “The functions and reproduction of migrant labor: comparative material from Southern Africa and the United States.” American Journal of Sociology81: 1050—1087.
6.
Connell, Bob1987Gender and Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
7.
Edwards, Richard1975 “The social relations of production in the firm and labor market structure.” Politics and Society5 (1): 83—108.
8.
Espiritu, Yen Le1997Asian American Women and Men: Labor, Laws, and Love. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
9.
Faludi, Susan2000Stiffed: The Betrayal of the American Man. New York: Perennial.
10.
Fernandez-Kelly, Maria Patricia and Ana M. Garcia1997 “Power surrendered, power restored: the politics of work and family among Hispanic garment workers in California and Florida,” pp. 125—228 in Mary Romero, Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo , and Vilma Ortiz (eds.), Challenging Fronteras: Restructuring Latina and Latino Lives in the US. New York: Routledge.
11.
Gutman, Mathew1996The Meanings of Macho: Being a Man in Mexico City. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
Hinojosa Ojeda, R.1993 “Trade and immigration: the California-Mexico connection,” pp. 21—33 in Dan Holter (ed.), Beyond the Free Trade Debate: Labor's Future in California and Mexico. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Labor Research and Education/Institute of Industrial Relations.
13.
Holzer, Harry and Keith R. Ihlanfeldt1998 “Customer discrimination and employment outcomes for minority workers.” Quarterly Journal of Economics113: 835—867.
14.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette2001Doméstica: Immigrant Workers Cleaning and Caring in the Shadows of Affluence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Jenkins, Richard1986Racism and Recruitment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Jennings, James1994Blacks, Latinos, and Asians in Urban America. New York : Praeger.
17.
Kalb, Don1997Expanding Class. Durham: Duke University Press.
18.
Kearney, Michael1997Reconceptualizing the Peasantry: Anthropology in Global Perspective. Boulder: Westview Press.
19.
Kearney, Michael and Bernadette Beserra2004 “Migration and identities—A class-based approach.” Latin American Perspectives31 (5): 3—14.
20.
Lamont, Michelle2002The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
21.
Lamphere, Louise1993Situated Lives: Gender and Culture in Everyday Life. New York: Routledge.
22.
Macdonald, Cameron Lynne and Carmen J. Siriani1996Working in the Service Society . Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
23.
Malkin, Victoria2004 “`We go to get ahead': Gender and status in two Mexican migrant communities.” Latin American Perspectives31 (5): 75—99.
24.
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade1997 “Women workers and capitalist scripts: ideologies of domination, common interests, and the politics of solidarity,” in M. Jacqui Alexander and Chandra Talpade Mohanty (eds.), Feminist Genealogies, Colonial Legacies, Democratic Futures. New York: Routledge.
25.
Mullings, Leith1997On Our Own Terms: Race, Class, and Gender in the Lives of African American Women. New York: Routledge.
26.
Pessar, Patricia1999 “Engendering migration studies: the case of new immigrants in the United States.” American Behavioral Scientist42: 577—600.
27.
San Diego Workforce Partnerships1999Regional Growth Projections, 1999. San Diego.
28.
Shih, Johanna2002 “`Yeah, I could hire this one, but I know it's gonna be a problem': how race, nativity, and gender affect employers' perceptions of the manageability of job seekers.” Ethnic and Racial Studies25 (1): 99—119.
29.
Theodore, Nik and Chirag Mehta2001 “Day labor, low-wage work, and immigrant employment opportunities in Chicago.” Paper prepared for presentation to the Illinois Immigration Policy Project, Chicago, October 11.
30.
Valenzuela, Abel, Jr.1999Day Laborers in Southern California: Preliminary Findings from the Day Labor Survey. Center for the Study of Urban Poverty, Institute for Social Science Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Working Paper 99-04.
31.
Velez-Ibañez, Carlos1996Border Visions: Mexican Cultures of the Southwest United States. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
32.
Waldinger, Roger and Mark Lichter (eds.) 1996 “Who makes the beds? Who washes the dishes? Black/immigrant competition reassessed,” in Harriet Dulup and Phanindra Wannara (eds.), Immigrants and Immigration Policy: Individual Skills, Family Ties, and Group Identities. Greenwich: JAI Press.
