BaartsCharlotte. 2009. “Stuck in the Middle: Research Ethics Caught between Science and Politics.” Qualitative Research9: 423-439. Journal of Applied Communication Research33 (3).
2.
FitzgeraldMaureen H.2005. “Punctuated Equilibrium, Moral Panics, and the Ethical Review Process.” Journal of Academic Ethics2 (4): 315-338.
3.
Koro-LjungbergMirkaGemignaniMarcoBrodeurCheri WintonKmiecCheryl. 2007. “The Technologies of Normalization and Self: Thinking About IRBs and Extrinsic Research Ethics with Foucault.” Qualitative Inquiry13 (8): 1075-1094.
DerbyshireStuart W. G.2006. “The Rise of the Ethics Committee: Regulation by Another Name?” Pp. 35-50 in PantonJamesHartwichOliver Marc (eds), Science vs Superstition: The Case for A New Scientific Enlightenment. London, UK: Policy Exchange Limited and University of Buckingham Press Limited.
6.
Dixon-WoodsMAngellE.AshcroftR.EBrymanA.2007. “Written Work: The Social Functions of Research Ethics Committee Letters.” Social Science & Medicine65 (4): 792-802.
7.
HollandKate. 2007. “The Epistemological Bias of Ethics Review: Constraining Mental Health Research.” Qualitative Inquiry13 (6): 895-913.
8.
IsraelMark. 2005. “Research Hamstrung by Ethics Creep.” The Australian News. 12January.
9.
MäkeläKlaus. 2006. “Ethical Control of Social Research: Rules of Research Ethics and Their Interpretation.” Nordisk Alkohol & Narkotika Tidskrift23 (English Supplement): 5-19.
10.
ParkerDamon RJamesMichaelBarrettRobert J.2005. “The Practical Logic of Reasonableness: An Ethnographic Reconnaissance of a Research Ethics Committee.” Monash Bioethics Review24 (4): 7-27.
11.
van den HoonaardWill. 2011. The Seduction of Ethics: Transforming the Social Sciences. Toronto, CAN: University of Toronto Press.