The institutional context peculiar to late and marginal capitalist development is analyzed with respect to the political and economic role of the state, the nature of interest articulation, and typical organizational forms of trade unions in order to establish the probability of achieving worker control through various schemes of industrial democracy, using as illustrations the cases of Peru, Chile, and Mexico.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ABUSADA, S.
(1978) "Reformas estructurales y crisis economica en el sector industrial peruano." Prepared for the Conference on "The Peruvian Experiment Reconsidered," organized by the Latin American Program of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, October.
2.
ALBERTI, G.
, J. SANSITEVAN, and PLLUIS (1977) Estado y Clase: La Comunidad Industrial en el Peru. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
3.
ANDERSON, B.
and J. COCKCROFT (1966) "Control and cooptation in Mexican politics."International J. of Comparative Sociology7 (March).
4.
ANGELL, A.
(1972) Politics and the Labor Movement in Chile. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, Oxford Univ. Press.
5.
BAZAN, L.
(1977) "Sindicalismo independiente: el caso de Nissan Mexicana."Centro de Investigaciones Superiores del Instituto Nacional de Antropoligia e Historia. (mimeo)
6.
BRANDENBURG, F. R.
(1964) The Making of Modern Mexico. New York: Prentice-Hall.
7.
CORDOVA, A.
(1972) La Formación del Poder Politico en Mexico. Mexico: Era.
8.
GONZALES CASANOVA, P.
(1970) Democracy in Mexico. London: Oxford Univ. Press.
9.
GODAU, R.
and V. B. MARQUEZ (1981) "Estado Mexicano y desarrollo industrial."Nueva Politica.
10.
GOMEZ TAGLE, S.
(1980) La Corriente Democratica y Los Sindicatos Electricistas. Mexico: El Colegio de Mexico, Jornadas.
11.
JELIN, E.
(1976) "Spontaneite et organization dans le mouvement ouvrier: Le cas de L'Argentine, du Bresil et du Mexicque."Sociologie du Travail18 (Jun): 139-168.
12.
KAUFMAN, R. R.
(1977) "Corporations cientelism, and partisan conflict: a study of several Latin American countries," in J. Malloy (ed.) Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
13.
KNIGHT, P. T.
(1975) Peru, Hacia la autogestion?Buenos Aires: Proyección.
14.
MALLOY, J.
[ed.] (1977) Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
15.
MOUZELIS, N.
(1978) "Class and clientelistic politics: the case of Greece."Soc. Rev. (August): 471-495.
16.
PURCELL, J.F.H.
and S. K. PURCELL (1977) "Mexico's PRI: the institutionalization of corporatism," pp. 191-226 in J. Malloy (ed.) Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh Univ. Press.
17.
PURCELL, S. K.
and S.F.H. PURCELL (1980) "State and society in Mexico: must a stable policy be institutionalized."World Politics, (January): 194-227.
18.
REYNA, J. L.
, F. ZAPATA, M. M. FLEURY, and S. G. TAGLE (1976) Tres Estudios Sobre el Movimiento Obrero en Mexico. El Colegio de Mexico.
19.
STEPHENS, E. H.
(1980) The Politics of Workers' Participation: The Peruvian Approach in Comparative Perspective. New York: Academic Press.
20.
URTEAGA CASTRO-POZO, P.
(1978) "Autonomia obrera restauracíon empresarial: una experiencia de comites de fábricas."Centro de Investigaciones Superiores del Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia. (mimeo)
21.
WHYTE, W. F.
and G. ALBERTI (1977) "The industrial community in Peru."Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science431 (May).
22.
ZAPATA, F.
(1975) "Los mineros de Chiquicamata: productores o proletarios?Cuadernos del CES 13, El Colegio de Mexico.
23.
ZAPATA, F.
(1974) "Las relaciones entre el movimiento obrero y el gobiemo de Salvador Allende."Cuadernos del CES, El Colegio de Mexico.
