This paper draws on initial field experiences of the authors as participant observers of family members engaged in household work. Negotiating access and establishing rapport provided more than unusual problems of data collection. Such experiences also generated substantive insights into the characteristics of household work. Discussion focuses on the relationships between features of the household work setting, lack of consensus on the criteria by which household work is judged, and respondent views of household work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ARIES, P.
(1962) Centuries of Childhood. New York: Vintage.
2.
BAIN, R.
(1950) "The researcher's role: a case study."Human Organization9 (Summer): 23-28.
3.
BECK, B.
(1970) "Cooking welfare stew," pp. 7-29 in R. W. Habenstein (ed.) Pathways to Data. Chicago: Aldine.
4.
BECKER, H. S.
(1974) "On methodology," pp. 3-24 in H. S. Becker (ed.) Sociological Work: Method and Substance. Chicago: Aldine.
5.
BERHEIDE, C. W.
, S. F. BERK, and R. A. BERK (1976) "Household work in the suburbs: the job and its participants."Pacific Soc. Rev.19, 4 (October).
6.
BERK, S. F.
, R. A. BERK, and C. W. BERHEIDE (1976) "The non-division of household labor."Northwestern University. (unpublished)
7.
BLOOD, R. O.
(1958) "III. The use of observational methods in family research."J. of Marriage and the Family20 (March-April): 47-52.
8.
FARBER, B.
(1970) "Studying family and kinship," pp. 50-80 in R. W. Habenstein (ed.) Pathways to Data. Chicago: Aldine.
9.
GEER, B.
(1964) "First days in the field," pp. 372-398 in P. E. Hammond (ed.) Sociologists at Work. New York: Anchor-Doubleday.
10.
GOFFMAN, E.
(1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor-Doubleday.
11.
HOCHSCHILD, A.
(1973) "A review of the sex role research."Amer. J. of Soc. 78 (January-February): 1011-1023.
12.
HUMPHREYS, L.
(1970) Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places. Chicago: Aldine.
13.
KAHN, R. L.
(1972) "The meaning of work: interpretation and proposals for measurement," pp. 159-204 in A. Campbell and P. E. Converse (eds.) The Human Meaning of Social Change. New York: Russell Sage.
14.
LOPATA, H.
(1971) Occupation: Housewife. London: Oxford University.
15.
MANN, F. C.
(1951) "Human relations skills in social research."Human Relations4 (September): 341-354.
16.
NEFF, W. S.
(1968) Work and Human Behavior. New York: Atherton.
17.
OAKLEY, A.
(1974a) The Sociology of Housework. New York: Pantheon.
18.
OAKLEY, A.
(1974b) Woman's Work. New York: Pantheon.
19.
OLESON, V.
and E. W. WHITTAKER (1970) "Role-making in participant observation: processes in the observer-actor relationship," pp. 381-397 in N. K. Denzin (ed.) Sociological Methods. Chicago: Aldine.
20.
SCHATZMAN, L.
and A. STRAUSS (1973) Field Research. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
21.
SCHULTZ, T.
(ed.) (1974) Economics of the Family. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
22.
STEIDL, R.
and E. C. BRATTON (1968) Work in the Home. New York: John Wiley.
23.
WAX, R.
(1960) "Reciprocity in field work," pp. 90-98 in R. N. Adams and J. J. Preiss (eds.) Human Organization Research: Field Relationships and Techniques. New York: Dorsey.
24.
ZARETSKY, E.
(1973) "Capitalism, the family and personal life, parts 1 and 2,"Socialist Revolution3 (January-June): 69-125; 19-70.
25.
ZELDITCH, M.
(1964) "Family, marriage and kinship," pp. 680-733 in R.E.L. Faris (ed.), Handbook of Modern Sociology. Chicago: Rand McNally.
