In response to the increasing numbers of criminal offenders involved with drugs, the criminal justice system has sought more effective means of intervening with these offenders. One intervention approach is Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC), an offender management model that has been implemented in various forms since the early 1970s. TASC facilitates treatment for drug-using offenders as part of an overall strategy to control drug use and associated criminal behaviors. This article reviews the evolution of TASC and reports findings from an evaluation of five TASC programs. The evaluation, experimental at two sites and quasi-experimental at three, found favorable effects of TASC programs on service delivery and offenders' drug use. Findings on criminal recidivism were mixed and difficult to interpret. This article concludes with specific recommendations for improving TASC and similar programs within the criminal justice system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anglin, M. D. , Longshore, D., Turner, S., McBride, D., Inciardi, J., & Prendergast, M. (1996). Studies of the functioning and effectiveness of treatment alternatives to street crime (TASC) programs [Final report]. Los Angeles: UCLA Drug Abuse Research Center.
2.
Bureau of Justice Assistance . (1989). Treatment alternatives to street crime. TASC programs: Resource catalog. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance, U.S. Department of Justice.
3.
Bureau of Justice Assistance (1992). Treatment alternatives to street crime. TASC programs: Program brief (NCJ Publication No. 129759). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance, U.S. Department of Justice.
4.
Bureau of Justice Statistics . (1993). Drug and crime facts, 1992 (NCJ-139651). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
5.
Chaiken, J. M. , & Chaiken, M. R. (1982). Varieties of criminal behavior (RAND Publication No. R-2814). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
6.
Chou, C. -P. , Hser, Y. -I., & Anglin, M. D. (1996). Pattern reliability of narcotics addicts' self-reported data: A confirmatory assessment of construct validity and consistency. Substance Use & Misuse, 31(9), 1189-1216.
7.
Collins, J. J. , Hubbard, R. L., Rachal, J. V., Cavanaugh, E. R., & Craddock, S. G. (1982). Criminal justice clients in drug treatment. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
8.
Hser, Y. -I. , Anglin, M. D., & Chou, C. -P. (1992). Reliability of retrospective self-report by narcotics addicts. Psychological Assessment, 4(2), 207-213.
9.
Hubbard, R. L. , Collins, J. J., Rachal, J. V., & Cavanaugh, E. R. (1988). The criminal justice client in drug abuse treatment. In C. G. Leukefeld & F. M. Tims (Eds.), Compulsory treatment of drug abuse: Research and clinical practice (NIDA Research Monograph 86, pp. 57-80). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
10.
Inciardi, J. A. (1987). Heroin use and street crime. In C. D. Chambers, J. A. Inciardi, D. M. Petersen, H. A. Siegal, and O. Z. White (Eds.), Chemical dependencies: Patterns, costs, and consequences. Athens: Ohio University Press.
11.
Inciardi, J. A. , & McBride, D. C. (1991). Treatment alternatives to street crime: History, experiences, and issues (DHHS Pub. No. ADM 92-1749). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
12.
Johnson, B. , & Wish, E. (Eds.). (1986). Crime rates among drug-abusing offenders: Final report to the National Institute of Justice. New York: Narcotic and Drug Research.
13.
Marquis, K. H. (1981). Quality of prisoner self-reports: Arrest and conviction response errors. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
14.
Nurco, D. N. , Kinlock, T. W., & Hanlon, T. E. (1990). The drugs-crime connection. In J. A. Inciardi (Ed.), Handbook of drug control in the United States (pp. 71-90). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
15.
Petersilia, J. , & Turner, S. (1990). Intensive supervision probation for high-risk offenders: findings from three California experiments (RAND Publication No. R-3936-NIJ/BJA). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
16.
Petersilia, J. , & Turner, S. (1993). Intensive probation and parole. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 17, pp. 281-335). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Speckart, G. R. , & Anglin, M. D. (1986). Narcotics and crime: A causal modeling approach. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2, 3-28.
18.
System Sciences . (1979). Evaluation of treatment alternatives to street crime: National evaluation program, phase II report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.
19.
Toborg, M. A. , Levin, D. R., Milkman, R. H., & Couter, L. J. (1976). Treatment alternatives to street crime (TASC) projects: National evaluation program, phase I summary report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
20.
Weinman, B. (1990). Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC). In J. A. Inciardi (Ed.), Handbook of drug control in the United States (pp. 139-150). New York: Greenwood.
21.
Wellisch, J. , Prendergast, M., & Anglin, M. D. (1993). Criminal justice and drug treatment systems linkage: Federal promotion of interagency collaboration in the 1970s. Contemporary Drug Problems, 20, 611-650.
