Previous research has shown that the public endorses rehabilitation as a core goal of corrections. Over the past decade, however, the campaign to get tough on crime has grown in strength. In this context, the question emerges as to whether support for rehabilitation has diminished or maintained its hold on public thinking. The authors address this issue by replicating a 1986 study by Cullen, Skovron, Scott, and Burton that explored attitudes toward correctional treatment. The data reveal that citizens' support for rehabilitation has declined meaningfully. Even so, the public continues to view treatment as a legitimate correctional objective, especially for juvenile and nonviolent offenders.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrews, D. A. , & Bonta, J. (1994). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
2.
Andrews, D. A. , Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
3.
Benekos, P. J. , & Merlo, A. V. (1995). Three strikes and you're out!: The political sentencing game. Federal Probation, 59, 3-9.
4.
Bragg, R. (1995, March 26). Chain gangs to return to the roads of Alabama: State hopes revival will deter crime. The New York Times, p. Y9.
5.
Brown, E. J. , Flanagan, E. D., & McLeod, M. (Eds.). (1984). The sourcebook of criminal justice statistics—1983. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
6.
Clear, T. R. (1994). Harm in American penology: Offenders, victims, and their communities. Albany: State University of New York Press.
7.
Cohen, A. (1995, May 15). Back on the chain gang. Time, p. 26.
8.
Cullen, F. T. (1995). Assessing the penal harm movement. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32,338-358.
9.
Cullen, F. T. , Clark, G. A., Cullen, J. B., & Mathers, R. A. (1985). Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12,305-331.
10.
Cullen, F. T. , Clark, G. A., & Wozniak, J. F. (1985). Explaining the get tough movement: Can the public be blamed?Federal Probation, 49,16-24.
11.
Cullen, F. T. , Cullen, J. B., & Wozniak, J. F. (1988). Is rehabilitation dead? The myth of the punitive public. Journal of Criminal Justice, 16,303-317.
12.
Cullen, F. T. , & Gilbert, K. E. (1982). Reaffirming rehabilitation. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
13.
Cullen, F. T. , Golden, K. M., & Cullen, J. B. (1983). Is child saving dead? Attitudes toward juvenile rehabilitation in Illinois. Journal of Criminal Justice, 11,1-13.
14.
Cullen, F. T. , Skovron, S. E., Scott, J. E., & Burton, V. S., Jr. (1990). Public support for correctional treatment: The tenacity of rehabilitative ideology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17,6-18.
15.
Cullen, F. T. , & Wright, J. P. (1996). Two futures of American corrections. In B. Maguire & P. Rodash (Eds.), The past, present, and future of American criminal justice (pp. 198-219). New York: General Hall.
16.
Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.
17.
Duffee, D. , & Ritti, R. R. (1977). Correctional policy and public values. Criminology, 14,449-459.
18.
Farnworth, M. , Bennett, K., & West, V. M. (1996). Mail vs. telephone surveys of criminal justice attitudes: A comparative analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 12,113-133.
19.
Flanagan, T. J. , & Caulfield, S. L. (1984). Public opinion and prison policy: A review. The Prison Journal, 64,31-46.
20.
Forst, D. (1995). Prosecution and sentencing. In J. Q. Wilson & J. Petersillia (Eds.), Crime (pp. 363-386). San Francisco: ICS Press.
21.
Goldberg, H. (1994, April 10). Lock em'up, we're worried about crime. Associated Press poll.
22.
Hindelang, M. J. , Dunn, C. S., Aumick, A. L., & Sutton, L. P. (Eds.). (1975). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics—1974. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
23.
Innes, C. A. (1993). Recent public opinion in the United States toward punishment and corrections. The Prison Journal, 73,220-236.
24.
Johnson, B. (1994, November/December). To rehabilitate or punish: Results of a public opinion poll. American Jails, 8,41-43.
25.
Langworthy, R. H. , & Whitehead, J. T. (1986). Liberalism and fear as explanations of punitiveness. Criminology, 24,575-591.
26.
Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In D. C. Thomas, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light, T. A. Louis, & F. Mosteller (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 83-127). New York: Russell Sage.
27.
Lipsey, M. W. , & Wilson, D. B. (1997, January). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. Paper presented for the OJJDP Study Group on Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders.
28.
Maguire, K. , & Pastore, A. L. (Eds.). (1995). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics—1994. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
29.
McAneny, L. C. (Ed.). (1995). The Gallup Poll Monthly, 352, pp. 3, 7.
30.
McCorkle, R. C. (1993). Research note: Punish and rehabilitate? Public attitudes toward six common crimes. Crime & Delinquency, 39,240-252.
31.
McGarrell, E. F. , & Flanagan, T. J. (Eds.). (1985). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics—1984. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
32.
New Jerseyans want to get tough on crime. (1994, July 17). The Star-Ledger/Eagleton Poll. American Public Opinion Data.
33.
Palmer, T. (1995). Programmatic and nonprogrammatic aspects of successful intervention: New directions for research. Crime & Delinquency, 42,100-131.
34.
Pettinico, G. (1994). Crime and punishment: America changes its mind. The Public Perspective, 5,29-32.
35.
Public Agenda Foundation . (1987). Crime and punishment: The public's view. New York: Edna McConnell Clark Foundation.
36.
Public backs wholesale prison reform . (1982). Gallup Report, 22,3-16.
37.
Reichel, P. L. , & Gauthier, A. K. (1990). Boot camp corrections: A public reaction. In R. Muraskin (Ed.), Issues in justice: Exploring policy issues in the criminal justice system (pp. 73-96). Bristol, IN: Wyndham Hall.
38.
Rothman, D. J. (1980). Conscience and convenience: The asylum and its alternatives in progressive America. Boston: Little, Brown.
39.
Singh, A. , & Jayewardene, C. H. S. (1978). Philosophical consistency in public attitudes on crime and justice. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 11,182-184.
40.
Small towns as worried now as big cities: Crime fears hit home . (1995). The Public Pulse, 10, p. 1.
41.
Steinhart, D. (1988, December). California opinion poll: Public attitudes on youth crime. NCCD Focus, pp. 1-7.
42.
Thomson, D. R. , & Ragona, A. J. (1987). Popular moderation versus governmental authoritarianism: An interactionist view of public sentiments toward criminal sanctions. Crime & Delinquency, 33,337-357.
43.
Turner, M. G. , Sundt, J. L., Applegate, B. K., & Cullen, F. T. (1995). The prevalence and structure of “three strikes and you're out” legislation: A national assessment. Federal Probation, 59,16-35.
44.
U.S. Bureau of the Census . (1994). County and city data book: 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
45.
U.S. News and World Report Poll. (1994, October). Public Opinion Online [On-line]. Retrieved October 1994, NEXIS-LEXIS.
46.
U.S. News and World Report Poll. (1996, January). Public Opinion Online [On-line]. Retrieved October 1994, NEXIS-LEXIS.
47.
Warr, M. , & Stafford, M. (1984). Public goals of punishment and support for the death penalty. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21,95-111.
