This article reviews the literature of the past 20 years on offender classification. Early developments represented a convergence of professional, legal, and political demands. Recent progress in several areas is noted: risk assessment and correctional supervision, classification based on psychological characteristics, and needs assessment. An integration of trends argues for a systems approach to classification, connecting it more specifically to intervention. Current efforts that warrant further attention are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association of Correctional Psychologists . (1980). Standards for psychology services in adult jails and prisons. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 7, 81-127.
2.
American Correctional Association . (1964). Handbook on classification in correctional institutions (rev. ed.) New York: Author.
3.
American Correctional Association . (1977). Manual of standards for adult correctional institutions. Rockville, MD: Author.
4.
American Correctional Association . (1982). Classification as a management tool. College Park, MD: Author.
5.
American Correctional Association . (1993). Classification: A tool for managing today's offenders. College Park, MD: Author.
6.
Andrews, D. H. , & Bonta, J. (1994). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
7.
Andrews, D. A. , Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.
8.
Andrews, D. , & Wormith, J., (1989). Personality and crime: Knowledge destruction and construction in criminology. Justice Quarterly, 6, 289-310.
9.
Andrews, D. , Zinger, I., Hoge, R., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
10.
Austin, J. (1983). Assessing the new generation of prison classification models. Crime & Delinquency, 29, 561-576.
11.
Austin, J. (1986). Evaluating how well your classification system is operating: A practical approach. Crime & Delinquency, 32, 302-322.
12.
Austin, J. , Holien, D., Chan, L., & Baird, C. (1989). Reducing prison violence by more effective inmate management: An experimental field test of the Prisoner Management Classification (PMC). San Francisco, CA: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
13.
Bohn, M. J. (1979). Management classification for young adult inmates. Federal Probation, 43, 53-59.
14.
Bonta, J. , & Motiuk, L. L. (1985). Utilization of an interview-based classification instrument: A study of correctional halfway houses. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 333-352.
15.
Bonta, J. , & Motiuk, L. L. (1992). Inmate classification. Journal of Criminal Justice, 20, 343-353.
16.
Clements, C. B. (1981). The future of offender classification: Some cautions and prospects. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 8, 15-35.
17.
Clements, C. B. (1982). The relationship of offender classification to the problems of prison overcrowding. Crime & Delinquency, 28, 72-81.
18.
Clements, C. B. (1985). Towards an objective approach to offender classification. Law and Psychology Review, 9, 45-55.
19.
Clements, C. B. (1986). Offender needs assessment. College Park, MD: American Correctional Association.
20.
Clements, C. B. (1988). The measurement and evaluation of correctional resource management. In B. Wolford & P. Lawrenz (Eds.), Classification: Innovative correctional programs (pp. 5-10). Richmond: Eastern Kentucky University Press.
21.
Cohn, E. G. , & Farrington, D. P. (in press). Who are the most cited scholars in major American criminology and criminal justice journals?Journal of Criminal Justice.
22.
Cullen, F. , & Gilbert K. (1982). Reaffirming rehabilitation. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
23.
Cullen, F. , Skovron, J., Burton, S., & Burton, V. (1990). Public support for correctional treatment: The tenacity of rehabilitative ideology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 6-18.
24.
Gendreau, P. , & Ross, R. (1987). Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s. Justice Quarterly, 4, 349-407.
25.
Gibbs, J. G. (1991). Environmental congruence and symptoms of psychopathology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18, 351-374.
26.
Gottfredson, S. , & Gottfredson, D. M. (1981). Risk screening: A comparison of methods. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 8, 315-338.
27.
Gottfredson, D. , & Tonry, M. (1987). Prediction and classification: Criminal justice decision-making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Hare, R. D. , Hart, S. D., & Harpur, T. J. (1991). Psychopathy and the DSM-IV criteria for antisocial personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 391-398.
29.
Harpur, T. J. , Hare, R. D., & Hakstian, A. R. (1989). Two-factor conceptualization of psychopathy: Construct validity and assessment implications. Psychological Assessment, 1, 6-17.
30.
Harris, P. (1988). The Interpersonal Maturity Level Classification System: I-level. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 58-77.
31.
Hart, S. D. , Kropp, P. R., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Performance of male psychopaths following conditional release from prison. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 227-232.
32.
Hunt, D. , Butler, L., Noy, J., & Rosser (1978). Assessing conceptual level by the paragraph completion method. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
33.
Jenkins, W. O. , de Valera, E. K., & Muller, J. B. (1977). The Behavioral Evaluation Treatment and Analysis (BETA) System in the prediction of the criminal and delinquent behavior. Quarterly Journal of Correction, 1, 44-50.
34.
Jesness, C. (1971). Jesness Inventory Classification System. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 78-91.
35.
Lerner, K. , Arling, G., & Baird, S. C. (1986). Client management classification strategies for case supervision. Crime & Delinquency, 32, 254-271.
36.
Levinson, R. (1982). A clarification of classification. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9, 133-142.
37.
Levinson, R. (1988). Developments in the classification process. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 24-38.
38.
MacKenzie, D. (1989). Prison classification: The management and psychological perspectives. In L. Goodstein & D. MacKenzie (Eds.), The American prison: Issues in research and policy (pp. 163-189). New York: Plenum.
39.
MacKenzie, D. , Posey, C., & Rapaport, K. (1988). A theoretical revolution in corrections: Varied purposes for classification. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 125-136.
40.
Megargee, E. I. (1974). Applied psychological research in a correctional setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1, 43-50.
41.
Megargee, E. I. (1977). A new classification system for criminal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 4, 107-114.
42.
Megargee, E. I. (in press). Using the MMPI-based classification system with the MMPI-2s of male prison inmates. Psychological Assessment.
43.
Megargee, E. , & Bohn, M. (1979). Classifying criminal offenders: A new system based on the MMPI. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44.
Menzies, R. , Webster, C. D., McMain, S., Staley, S., & Scaglione, R. (1994). The dimensions of dangerousness revisited: Assessing forensic predictions about violence. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 1-28.
45.
Monahan, J. (1984). The prediction of violent behavior: Toward a second generation of theory and policy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 10-15.
46.
Morris, E. K. , & Braukmann, C. J. (1987). Behavioral approaches to crime and delinquency. New York: Plenum.
47.
Motiuk, L. L. , Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (1986). Classification in correctional halfway houses: The relative and incremental predictive criterion validities of the Megargee-MMPI and LSI systems, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 33-46.
48.
Motiuk, M. S. , Motiuk, L. L., & Bonta, J. (1992). A comparison between self-report and interview-based inventories in offender classification. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 19, 143-159.
49.
National Institute of Corrections . (1982). Prison classification: A model systems approach. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
50.
Ogloff, J. P. R. , Wong, S., & Greenwood, A. (1990). Treating criminal psychopaths in a therapeutic community program. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 8, 81-90.
51.
Palmer, T. (1984). Treatment and the role of classification: A review of basics. Crime & Delinquency, 30, 245-267.
52.
Palmer, T. (1992). The reemergence of correctional intervention: Developments through the 1980s and prospects for the future. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53.
Palmigiano v. Garrahy, 443 F. Supp. 956 (D.R.I. 1977).
54.
Posey, C. D. (1988). Correctional classification based upon psychological characteristics [Special issue]. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15(1).
55.
Pugh v. Locke, 406 F. Supp. 318 (M. D. Ala 1976).
56.
Quay, H. C. (1977). The three faces of evaluation: What can be expected to work. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 4, 341-354.
57.
Quay, H. C. (1983). Technical manual for the behavioral classification system for adult offenders (Grant No. FB-6). Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
58.
Quay, H. C. (1984). Managing adult inmates: Classification for housing and program assignment. College Park, MD: American Correctional Association.
59.
Ramos v. Lamm, 520 F. Supp. 1059 (D. Colo. 1981).
60.
Sechrest, L. (1987). Classification for treatment. In D. Gottfredson & M. Tonry (Eds.), Prediction and classification: Criminal justice decision-making (pp. 293-322). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61.
Sechrest, L. , & Redner, R. (1979). Strength and integrity of treatments in evaluation studies. In How well does it work? Review of criminal justice evaluation (pp. 19-62). Washington, DC: National Institute for Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.
62.
Sechrest, L. , West, S. G., Phillips, M., Redner, R., & Yeaton, W. (1979). Some neglected problems in evaluation research: Strength and integrity of treatments. Evaluation Studies Review Annual, 4, 15-35.
63.
Simmons, J. G. , Johnson, D. C., Gouvier, W. D., & Muzcyzka, M. J. (1981). The Meyer-Megargee inmate typology: Dynamic or unstable?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 8, 49-54.
64.
Smith, W. A. , & Fenton, C. E. (1978). Unit management in a penitentiary: A practical experience. Federal Probation, 42, 40-46.
65.
Stumphauzer, J. S. (1986). Helping delinquents change: A treatment manual of social learning approaches. New York: Haworth.
66.
Toch, H. (1977). Living in prison. New York: Free Press.
67.
Toch, H. (1981). Inmate classification as a transaction. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 8, 3-14.
68.
Toch, H. (1985). Warehouses for people?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 478, 58-72.
69.
Van Voorhis, P. (1988). A cross-classification of five offender typologies: Issues of construct and predictive validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 24-38.
70.
Van Voorhis, P. (1994). Psychological classification of the adult male prison inmate. Albany: State University of New York Press.
71.
Wright, K. N. (1988). The relationship of risk, needs, and personality classification systems and prison adjustment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 454-471.
72.
Zager, L. D. (1983). Response to Simmons and associates: Conclusions about the MMPI-based classification system's stability are premature. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 8, 310-315.
73.
Zager, L. (1988). The MMPI-based criminal classification system: A review, current status, and future directions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 39-57.
