Two hundred and ninety one registered California voters completed Peterson and Thurstone's Attitude Toward Capital Punishment scale. About half of the participants then viewed a videotape of two executions, and the other participants watched a nature film. All of the respondents then completed an alternative version of the capital punishment attitude scale. Significantly more viewers of the execution videotape reduced their support for capital punishment than did viewers of the control film, suggesting that resumption of public (i.e., televised) executions may somewhat reduce support for the death penalty.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrich, D. (1988). The application of an unfolding model of the PIRT type to the measurement of attitude. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 33-51.
2.
Andrich, D. (1989). A probabilistic IRT model for unfolding preference data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 193-216.
3.
Bailey, W. C. (1990). Murder, capital punishment, and television: Execution publicity and homicide rates. American Sociological Review, 55, 628-633.
4.
Bailey, W. C. , & Peterson, R. D. (1989). Murder and capital punishment: A monthly time-series analysis of execution publicity. American Sociological Review, 54, 722-743.
5.
Bohm, R. M. (1987). American death penalty attitudes: A critical examination of recent evidence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14, 380-396.
6.
Bowers, W. J. , with Pierce, G. L., & McDevitt, J. F. (1984). Legal homicide: Death as punishment in America, 1864-1982. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
7.
Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
8.
Cline, V. B. , Croft, R. G., & Courrier, S. (1973). Desensitization of children to television violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 360-365.
9.
Elliott, R. , & Robinson, R. J. (1991). Death penalty and the tendency to convict or acquit. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 389-404.
10.
Ellsworth, P. C. , & Ross, L. (1983). Public opinion and capital punishment: A close examination of the views of abolitionists and retentionists. Crime & Delinquency, 29, 116-169.
11.
Freinkel, A. , Koopman, C., & Spiegel, D. (1994). Dissociative symptoms in media eyewitnesses of an execution. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 1335-1339.
12.
Hoijtink, H. (1991). The measurement of latent traits by proximity items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 153-169.
13.
Kaplan, D. A. , with Wright, L. (1990, February 19). Breaking the death barrier. Newsweek, 115, 72-73.
14.
Lester, D. (1979). Executions as a deterrent to murder. Psychological Reports, 44, 562.
15.
Madden, T. M. , & Klopfer, F. J. (1978). The “cannot decide” option in Thurstone-type attitude scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 259-264.
16.
Masur, L. P. (1989). Rites of execution: Capital punishment and the transformation of the American culture, 1776-1865. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Moore, M. (1973). Ambivalence in attitude measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 481-483.
18.
Moore, M. (1975). Attitude toward capital punishment: Scale validation. Psychological Reports, 37, 21-22.
19.
Peterson, R. C. , & Thurstone, L. L. (1933). Motion pictures and the social attitudes of children. New York: Macmillan.
20.
Quindlen, A. (1991, May 18). TV executions could change viewers' views. Stockton Record, p. A12.
21.
Rosenberg, H. (1994, December 9). Cold, hard facts about airing death footage on TV. Los Angeles Times, pp. F1, F24.
22.
Scott, R. P. (Producer), & Lecilaire, C. (Director). (1978). Faces of death [Videotape]. (Available from Gorgon Video, 5042 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 465, Los Angeles, CA 90036)
23.
Shaw, M. E. , & Wright, J. M. (1967). Scales for the measurement of attitudes. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24.
Stewart, P. R. (1973). The linear model in attitude measurement: An example and some comments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 285-290.
25.
Thomas, M. H. , Horton, R. W., Lippincott, E. C., & Drabman, R. S. (1977). Desensitization to portrayals of real-life aggression as a function of exposure to television violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 450-458.
26.
Thurstone, L. L. (1931). The measurement of social attitudes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Tyler, T. R. , & Weber, R. (1982). Support for the death penalty: Instrumental response to crime, or symbolic attitude?Law & Society Review, 17, 21-45.
28.
Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968).
29.
York, C. M. (1966). Stability of Thurstone scale values after 35 years. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23, 628.
