Drawing on labeling theory, this study examined peers' attitudinal responses to the official label of delinquency. Specifically, two questions were asked: (a) Do peers' attitudinal responses to official delinquents vary with the severity of official reaction? (b) Do peers' attitudinal responses depend on their own labeling status? Questions concerning hypothetical delinquents receiving differing levels of severity of official reaction were administered to delinquents and nondelinquents in Tianjin, China. The severity of official reaction to delinquency was significantly associated with peers' rejection of official delinquents, with this relationship being greater for nondelinquent peers' rejection than for delinquent peers' rejection. Also, peers' attitudinal rejection varied significantly with their own labeling status, but only at certain levels of severity of official reaction. The findings were generally consistent with the labeling perspective. Discussion focuses on their implications for theory and policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ageton, S. , & Elliott, D. S. (1974). The effect of legal processing on self-concept. Social Problems, 22, 87-100.
2.
Association of Chinese Juvenile Delinquency Study . (1988). Yearbook on Chinese juvenile delinquency studies (Vol. 1). Beijing, China: Chuenqiu Publications.
3.
Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.
4.
Berk, R. A. , Campell, A., Klap, R., & Western, B. (1992). The deterrent effect of arrest: A Bayesian analysis of four field experiments. American Sociological Review, 57, 689-708.
5.
Bord, R. (1971). Rejection of the mentally ill: Continuities and further developments. Social Problems, 18, 469-509.
6.
Buikhuisen, W. , & Dijksterhuis, P. H. (1971). Delinquency and stigmatization. British Journal of Criminology, 11, 185-187.
7.
Farina, A. , Felner, R., & Boudreau, L. (1973). Rejection of workers to male and female mental patient job applicants. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41, 363-372.
8.
Farina, A. , & Hagelauer, H. (1975). Sex and mental illness: The generosity of females. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 122.
9.
Farina, A. , Murray, P., & Groh. T. (1978). Sex and worker acceptance of a former mental patient. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 887-891.
10.
Foster, J. D. , Dinitz, S., & Reckless, W. C. (1972). Perceptions of stigma following public intervention for delinquent behavior. Social Problems, 20, 202-209.
11.
Gibbs, J. P. (1966). Conceptions of deviant behavior: The old and the new. Pacific Sociological Review, 9, 9-14.
12.
Gibbs, J. P. (1972). Issues in defining deviant behavior. In R. A. Scott & J. D. Douglas (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives on deviance (pp. 39-68). New York: Basic Books.
13.
Gove, W. R. (1980). Labelling and mental illness: A critique. In W. R. Gove (Ed.), The labelling of deviance: Evaluating a perspective (2nd ed., pp. 35-81). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
Hagan, J. (1974). Extra-legal attitudes and criminal sanctioning: An assessment and a sociological viewpoint. Law and Society Review, 8, 357-383.
15.
Hepburn, J. R. (1977). The impact of police intervention upon juvenile delinquencies. Criminology, 15, 235-262.
16.
Hirschi, T. (1980). Labelling theory and juvenile delinquency: An assessment of the evidence. In W. R. Gove (Ed.), The labelling of deviance: Evaluating a perspective (2nd ed., pp. 271-293). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
Jensen, G. F. (1972). Delinquency and adolescent self-conceptions: A study of the personal relevance of infraction. Social Problems, 20, 84-102.
18.
Jensen, G. F. (1980). Labelling and identity: Toward a reconciliation of divergent findings. Criminology, 18, 121-129.
19.
Kirk, S. (1974). The effect of labelling on rejection of the mentally ill: An experimental study. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 15, 108-117.
20.
Leger, R. G. (1981). Labelling and its consequences in a closed social system. British Journal of Criminology, 21, 109-122.
21.
Lehman, S. , Joy, V., Kreisman, D., & Simmens, S. (1976). Responses to viewing symptomatic behaviors and labelling of prior mental illness. Journal of Community Psychology, 4, 327-334.
22.
Lemert, E. M. (1967). Human deviance, social problems and social control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23.
Link, B. G. (1982). Mental patient status, work and income: An examination of the effects of a psychiatric label. American Sociological Review, 47, 202-215.
24.
Link, B. G. (1987). Understanding labelling effects in the area of mental disorders: An assessment of the effects of expectations of rejection. American Sociological Review, 52, 96-112.
25.
Link, B. G. , & Cullen, F. T. (1983). Reconsidering the social rejection of ex-mental patients: Levels of attitudinal response. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 261-273.
26.
Link, B. G. , Cullen, F. T., Frank, J., & Wozniak, J. F. (1987). The social rejection of former mental patients: Understanding why labels matter. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1461-1500.
27.
Link, B. G. , Cullen, F. T., Struening, E., Shrout, P. E., & Dohrenwend, B. P. (1989). A modified labelling theory approach to mental disorders: An empirical assessment. American Sociological Review, 54, 400-423.
28.
Liska, A. E. (1987). Perspectives on deviance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29.
Loman, L. A. , & Larkin, W. (1976). Rejection of the mentally ill: An experiment in labelling. Sociological Quarterly, 17, 555-560.
30.
Palamara, F. , Cullen, F. T., & Gersten, J. C. (1986). The effect of police and mental health intervention on juvenile delinquency: Specifying contingencies in the impact of formal reaction. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27, 90-105.
31.
Pate, A. M. , & Hamilton, E. E. (1992). Formal and informal deterrents to domestic violence: The Dade County spouse assault experiment. American Sociological Review, 57, 691-697.
32.
Paternoster, R. , & Iovanni, L. (1989). The labeling perspective and delinquency: An elaboration of the theory and an assessment of the evidence. Justice Quarterly, 6, 359-394.
33.
Phillips, D. (1963). Rejection: A possible consequence of seeking help for mental disorders. American Sociological Review, 28, 963-972.
34.
Phillips, D. (1964). Rejection of the mentally ill: The influence of behavior and sex. American Sociological Review, 29, 679-687.
35.
Schroder, D. , & Erlich, D. (1968). Rejection by mental health professionals: A possible consequence of not seeking appropriate help for emotional disorders. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 9, 222-232.
36.
Schur, E. M. (1971). Labelling deviant behavior. New York: Harper & Row.
37.
Schwartz, R. D. , & Skolnick, J. H. (1962). Two studies of legal stigma. Social Problems, 10, 133-134.
38.
Sherman, L. W. , & Smith, D. A. (1992). Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 57, 680-690.
39.
Strager, S. F. , Chassin, L., & Young, R. D. (1983). Determinants of self-esteem among labeled adolescents. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 3-10.
40.
Sutherland, E. , & Cressey, D. (1970). Criminology (8th ed.). New York: Lippincott.
41.
Tittle, C. R. (1975). Deterrence or labeling?Social Forces, 53, 399-410.
42.
Tittle, C. R. (1980). Labeling and crime: An empirical evaluation. In W. R. Gove (Ed.), The labelling of deviance: Evaluating a perspective (2nd ed., pp. 241-263). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
43.
Wellford, C. F. (1975). Labeling theory and criminology: An assessment. Social Problems, 22, 332-345.
