Efforts to determine if a child has been sexually abused are increasingly becoming a part of mental health practice. This article suggests that many aspects of forensic mental health practice to “determine if a child has been abused” may run counter to traditional clinical training. The article also discusses the goals of forensic practice in this area.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bays, J. (1990). Are the genitalia of anatomical dolls distorted?Child Abuse & Neglect, 14, 171-176.
2.
Benedek, E. , & Schetky, D. (1987a). Problems in validating allegations of sexual abuse. Part 1: Factors affecting perception and recall of events. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 912-915.
3.
Benedek, E. , & Schetky, D. (1987b). Problems in validating allegations of sexual abuse. Part 2: Clinical evaluation. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 916-921.
4.
Berliner, L. , & Conte, J. (1990). The process of victimization: The victim's perspective. Child Abuse & Neglect, 14, 29-40.
5.
Berliner, L. , & Conte, J. (in press). Sexual abuse evaluations: Conceptual and empirical obstacles. Child Abuse & Neglect.
6.
Boat, B. , & Everson, M. (1986). Using anatomical dolls: Guidelines for interviewing young children in sexual abuse investigations. (Training manual for North Carolina Department of Human Resources)
7.
Boat, B. , & Everson, M. (1988a). Interviewing young children with anatomical dolls. Child Welfare, 62, 337-352.
8.
Boat, B. , & Everson, M. (1988b). Research and issues in using anatomical dolls. Annals of Sex Research, 1, 191-204.
9.
Boat, B. , Everson, M., & Holland, J. (1990). Maternal perceptions of nonabused young children's behavior after the children's exposure to anatomical dolls. Child Welfare, 69, 389-400.
10.
Cantwell, H. (1987). Update on vaginal inspection as it relates to child sexual abuse in girls under thirteen. Child Abuse & Neglect, 11, 545-546.
11.
Conte, J. (1990). Validating allegations of child sexual abuse: Dilemmas for the mental health professional. Child, Youth, and Family Services Quarterly (A Newsletter of The American Psychological Association, Division 37) 13(3), 7-19.
12.
Conte, J. , Sorenson, E., Fogarty, L., & Rosa, J. (1991). Evaluating children's reports of sexual abuse: A survey of professionals. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61, 428-437.
13.
De Young, M. (1986). A conceptual model for judging the truthfulness of a young child's allegation of sexual abuse. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 56, 550-559.
14.
Everson, M. , & Boat, B. (1989). False allegations of sexual abuse by children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, 230-235.
15.
Everson, M. , & Boat, B. (1990). Sexualized doll play among young children: Implications for the use of anatomical dolls in sexual abuse evaluations. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 736-742.
16.
Friedrich, W. , Urquiza, A., & Beilke, R. (1988). Behavior problems in young sexually abused children. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 11, 47-57.
17.
Gabriel, R. (1985). Anatomically correct dolls in the diagnosis of sexual abuse of children. Journal of the Melanie Klein Society, 3(2), 40-51.
18.
Gardner, R. (1987). The Parental Alienation Syndrome and the differentiation between fabricated and genuine child sex abuse. New Jersey: Creative Therapeutics.
19.
Goodman, G. (Ed.). (1984). The child witness [Special Issue]. Journal of Social Issues, 40(2).
20.
Goodman, G. , Aman, C., & Hirschman, J. (1987). Child sexual and physical abuse: Children's testimony. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.), Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 1-23). New York: Springer-Verlag.
21.
Goodman, G. , & Rosenberg, M. (1987). The child witness to family violence: Clinical and legal considerations. In D. Sonkin (Ed.), Domestic violence on trial. New York: Springer-Verlag.
22.
Green, A. (1986). True and false allegations of sexual abuse in child custody disputes. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 25, 449-456.
23.
Jampole, L. , & Weber, K. (1987). The assessment of behavior of sexually abused and nonsexually abused children with anatomically correct dolls. Child Abuse & Neglect, 11, 187-192.
24.
Johnson, M. , & Foley, M. (1984). Differentiating fact from fantasy: The reliability of children's memory. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 33-50.
25.
Jones, D. , & McQuiston, M. (1985). Interviewing the sexually abused child. Denver, CO: C. Henry Kempe National Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Child Abuse and Neglect.
26.
Marshall, W. (Ed.). (1989). Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories and treatment of the offender. New York: Plenum.
27.
Melton, G. , & Limbers, S. (1989). Psychologists involvement in cases of child maltreatment: Limits of role and expertise. American Psychologist, 44, 1225-1233.
28.
Morris, W. (1980). The American heritage dictionary. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
29.
Rosenfeld, A. , Nadelson, C., & Krieger, M. (1979). Fantasy and reality in patients' reports of incest. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 40(4), 159-164.
30.
Salter, A. C. (n.d.) Accuracy of expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases: A case study of Ralph Underwager and Holida Wakefield. Unpublished manuscript.
31.
Schor, D. , & Sivan, A. (1989). Interpreting children's labels for sex-related body parts of anatomically explicit dolls. Child Abuse & Neglect, 13, 523-531.
32.
Theones, N. , & Tjaden, P. (1990). The extent, nature, and validity of sexual abuse allegations in custody/visitation disputes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 14, 151-163.
33.
White, S. (1990). The investigatory interview with suspected victims of child sexual abuse. In A. M. La Greca (Ed.), Through the eyes of the child: Obtaining self reports from children and adolescents. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
34.
White, S. , Halpin, B., Strom, G., & Santilli, G. (1988). Behavioral comparisons of young sexually abused, neglected, and nonreferred children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 17, 53-61.
