This exploratory study examines the independent variables identified by a group of noncriminologists as being responsible for crime and describes the perceived causal connections between them. Sociological causes are more frequently invoked than are psychological factors. Network analysis reveals an implicit model composed of distal, mediating, and proximal causes. Two subsystems are identified, corresponding to societal and personal crime pathways. They are united by the perceived relationship between poverty and drug use.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Antaki, C. (1985). Ordinary explanations in conversation: Causal structures and their defence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 213-230.
2.
Banks, C. , Maloney, E., & Willcock, H. D. (1975). Public attitudes to crime and the penal system. British Journal of Criminology, 15, 228-240.
3.
Brickman, P. , Ryan, K., & Wortman, C. B. (1975). Causal chains: Attribution of responsibility as a function of immediate and prior causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1060-1067.
4.
Campbell, A. , & Muncer, S. (1987). Models of anger and aggression in the social talk of women and men. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 17, 489-512.
5.
Carroll, J. S. , & Payne, J. W. (1977). Judgements about crime and the criminal: A model and a method for investigating parole decisions. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Perspectives in law and psychology. Vol. 1: Criminal justice system (pp. 191-240). New York: Plenum.
6.
Cook, F. J. (1971). There's always a crime wave. In D. Cressey (Ed.), Crime and criminal justice. Chicago: Quadrangle.
7.
Cullen, A. T. , Clark, G. A., Cullen, J. B., & Mathers, R. A. (1985). Attribution, salience and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 305-331.
8.
Dominick, J. R. (1973). Crime and law enforcement on prime time television. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 241-250.
9.
Dominick, J. R. (1978). Crime and law enforcement in the mass media. In C. Winick (Ed.), Deviance and mass media (pp. 105-128). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
Duffee, D. , & Ritti, R. R. (1977). Correctional policy and public values. Criminology, 14, 449-459.
11.
Flanagan, T. S. , Van Alstyne, D. J., & Gottfredson, M. J. (1982). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics—1981. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
12.
Furnham, A. , & Henderson, M. (1983). Lay theories of delinquency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 107-120.
13.
Gallup, G. (1981). Reasons for increased crime rate. Gallup Reports, 187, 8-9.
14.
Garofalo, J. (1979). Victimization and the fear of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 16, 80-97.
15.
Gottfredson, S. D. (1981). Exploring the dimensions of judged offense seriousness: Report on improved correctional field services project evaluation. Baltimore, MD: Center for Metropolitan Planning and Research.
16.
Graber, D. A. (1980). Crime news and the public. New York: Praeger.
17.
Hargreaves, D. H. (1980). Common-sense models of action. In A. J. Chapman & D. M. Jones (Eds.), Models of man (pp. 215-225). Leicester: British Psychological Society.
18.
Harris, L. (1968). The public looks at crime and corrections. Washington, DC: Joint Commission on Correctional Manpower and Training.
19.
Hewstone, M. (1988). Causal attribution: From cognitive processes to collective beliefs. Psychologist: Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 8, 323-327.
20.
Hollin, C. R. , & Howells, K. (1987). Lay explanations of delinquency: Global or offence-specific?British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 203-210.
21.
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192-240). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
22.
Kelley, H. H. (1983). Perceived causal structures. In J. Jaspars, F. D. Fincham, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Attribution theory and research: Conceptual, development and social dimensions (pp. 343-369). London: Academic Press.
23.
Knoke, D. , & Kuklinski, J. H. (1982). Network analyses (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 07-028). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24.
Lentz, W. P. (1966). Social status and attitudes toward delinquency control. Crime and Delinquency, 3, 147-154.
25.
Lewis, P. A. , & Maxfield, M. G. (1980). Fear in the neighborhoods: An investigation of the impact of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 17, 160-189.
26.
Lunt, P. K. (1988). The perceived causal structure of examination failure. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 171-180.
27.
McIntyre, J. (1967). Public attitudes toward crime and law enforcement. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 374, 34-46.
28.
Meyer, J. P. (1980). Causal attributions for success and failure: A multivariate investigation of dimensionality, formation and consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 704-715.
29.
N.O.P. Market Research Ltd. (1970). Report on attitudes towards crime, violence and permissiveness in society. London: Author.
30.
Ourselves and crime—Who is guilty? (1966, September 29). New Society, pp. 478-481.
31.
Passer, M. W. , Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1978). Multidimensional scaling of the causes of negative interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 951-962.
32.
Peters, E. L. (1969). Public school attitudes toward juvenile delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 6, 56-62.
33.
Reed, J. , & Reed, R. (1973). Status, images and consequence: Once a criminal always a criminal. Sociology and Social Research, 57, 460-471.
34.
Reuterman, N. A. (1978). The public's view of delinquency causation: A consideration in comprehensive juvenile justice planning. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 29, 39-45.
35.
Reuterman, N. A. , & Cartwright, D. S. (1976). Practitioners' views of delinquency causation: A consideration in comprehensive juvenile justice planning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 3, 67-84.
36.
Rossi, P. , Waite, E., Bose, C., & Berk, R. (1974). The seriousness of crime: Normative structure and individual differences. American Sociological Review, 39, 224-237.
37.
Schutz, A. (1932). The phenomenology of the social world. London: Heinemann.
38.
Warr, M. (1982). The accuracy of public beliefs about crime: Further evidence. Criminology, 20, 185-204.
39.
Wells, G. (1981). Lay analyses of causal forces on behavior. In J. H. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior and the environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
