Some persons in the fields of substance abuse and corrections still believe that prison-based rehabilitation is ineffective and that treatment efforts should be reserved for the nonprison community. While correctional institutions are generally hostile environments that impede attempts at both treatment and research, both can be accomplished successfully, even though it is highly difficult to maintain the integrity of treatment programs and research studies within correctional facilities. This study reports treatment findings for the Stay'n Out therapeutic community (TC), which has operated in the New York State correctional system for over 12 years. This is the first large-scale study (N = 1,500) that provides convincing evidence that prison-based TC treatment can produce significant reductions in recidivism rates for males and females.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bale, R. N. (1969). Outcome research in therapeutic community for drug abusers: A critical review. International Journal of the Addictions, 14(8), 1053-1074.
2.
Ball, J. C. , Shaffer, J. W., & Nurco, D. N. (1983). Day to day criminality of heroin addicts in Baltimore: A study in the continuity of offense rates. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 12, 119-142.
3.
De Leon, G. (1979). The therapeutic community: Study of effectiveness. Internal report submitted to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, Washington, DC.
4.
De Leon, G. (1984). The therapeutic community: Study of effectiveness. Treatment Research Monograph Series, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Washington, DC.
5.
De Leon, G. , Andrews, M., Wexler, H. K., Jaffe, J., & Rosenthal, M. S. (1979). Therapeutic community drop-outs: Criminal behavior five years after treatment. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 6(3), 253-271.
6.
De Leon, G. , Holland, S., & Rosenthal, M. S. (1972). Phoenix House: Criminal activity of drop-outs. Journal of the American Medical Association, 226(6), 686-689.
7.
De Leon, G. , Wexler, H. K., & Jainchill, N. (1982). The therapeutic community: Success and improvement rates 5 years after treatment. International Journal of the Addictions, 17(4), 703-747.
8.
Field, G. (1989). The effects of intensive treatment on reducing the criminal recidivism of addicted offenders. Federal Probation, 53(4), 51-56.
9.
Gendreau, P. , & Ross, R. R. (1979). Effective correctional treatment: Bibliography for cynics. Crime & Delinquency, 25, 463-489.
10.
Gendreau, P. , & Ross, R. R. (1987). Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s. Justice Quarterly, 4(3), 349-407.
11.
Gropper, B. A. (1985). Probing the links between drugs and crime. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
12.
Holland, S. (1978). Gateway House: Effectiveness of treatment on criminal behavior. International Journal of the Addictions, 13(5), 369-381.
13.
Inciardi, J. A. (1979). Heroin use and street crime. Crime & Delinquency, 25, 333-346.
14.
Johnson, B. , Goldstein, P., Preble, E., Schmeidler, J., Lipton, D. S., Spunt, B., & Miller, T. (1985). Taking care of business: The economics of crime by heroin abusers. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
15.
Nash, G. (1973). The impact of drug abuse treatment upon criminality: A look at 19 programs. Upper Montclair, NJ: Montclair State College.
16.
National Institute on Drug Abuse . (1981). Drug abuse treatment in prisons. Treatment Research Report Series. DHHS Publication NO. (ADM) 81-1149.
17.
Sells, S. B. , Simpson, D., Joe, G., Demaree, R., Savage, L., & Lloyd, M. (1976). A national follow-up study to evaluate the effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: A report of cohort 1 of the DARP five years later. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 3(4), 545-556.
18.
Simpson, D. D. (1978). The relation of the time in drug abuse treatment to post-treatment outcomes. IBR Report 78-12.
19.
Simpson, D. D. (1980). Follow-up outcomes and length of the time spent in treatment for drug abuse. Fort Worth, TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University.
20.
System Sciences, Inc. (1973). A comparative analysis of twenty-four therapeutic communities in New York City. New York: Addiction Services Agency of the City of New York.
21.
U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1983).
22.
Wexler, H. K. , & Chin, J. (1981, May). Evaluation of a system to evaluate prison based drug treatment. Paper presented at the Eastern Evaluation Research Society Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
23.
Wexler, H. K. , Falkin, G. P., & Lipton D. S. (1988). A model prison rehabilitation program: An evaluation of the Stay'n Out therapeutic community. A final report to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, Washington, DC.
24.
Wexler, H. K. , Lipton, D. S., & Foster, K. (1985, November). Prison drug treatment: Study of recidivism. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology, San Diego, CA.
25.
Wexler, H. K. , Lipton, D. S., & Johnson, B. D. (1988). A criminal justice system strategy for treating drug offenders in custody. Issues and Practice Bulletin. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
26.
Wexler, H. K. , & Williams, R. (1986). The “Stay 'N Out” therapeutic community: Prison treatment for substance abusers. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 18(3), 221-230.
27.
Wilson, S. , & Mandelbrot, B. (1977). Criminal activity after treatment in a therapeutic community for drug abusers. Unpublished manuscript, Littlemore Hospital, Oxford, England.
