This article presents the results of a pilot study that examines the predictive and construct validity of five psychological classification systems. The sample consists of 52 newly admitted male federal penitentiary inmates. Types identified by both the Megargee MMPI-based taxonomy and Quay's taxonomy of adult offenders were found to be correlated with disciplinar infractions. Subjects diagnosed at lower stages of Conceptual Level and I-level were noted to be more likely to incur victimizations or threats. Results were also somewhat supportive of the construct validity of the following dimensions: (1) cognitive development (Conceptual Level, Moral Development, and I-level), (2) neurotic (Quay and I-level), and (3) committed criminal subtypes (Quay, MMPI, and I-level).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Carbonell, J. L. (1983). Inmate classification systems: A cross-tabulation of two methods. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 10, 285-292.
2.
Clements, C. B. (1981). The future of offender classification: Some cautions and prospects. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 8, 15-35.
3.
Colby, A. , Kohlberg, L., Gibbs, J., & Lieberman, M. (1980). A longitudinal study of moral judgment. Unpublished monograph. Cambridge: Harvard University.
4.
Gearing, M. L. (1979). The MMPI as a primary differentiator and predictor of behavior in prison: A methodological critique and review of the recent literature. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 929-963.
5.
Grant, J. D. , & Grant, M. Q. (1959). A group dynamics approach to the treatment of nonconformists in the Navy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, pp. 126-135.
6.
Harris, P. W. (1979). The interpersonal maturity of delinquents and nondelinquents. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Albany.
7.
Harris, P. W. (1983). The interpersonal maturity of delinquents and nondelinquents. In W. S. Laufer & J. M. Day (Eds.), Personality theory, moral development, and criminal behavior. Lexington: D. C. Heath.
8.
Heide, K. M. (1982). Classification of offenders ordered to make restitution by interpersonal maturity level and by specific personality dimensions (Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Albany). (University Microfilms No. DA8216022)
9.
Hickey, J. , & Scharf, P. (1980). Toward a just correctional system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Hunt, D. E. , Butler, L. F., Noy, J. E., & Rosser, M. E. (1978). Assessing conceptual level by the paragraph completion method. Ontario: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
11.
Jennings, W. , Kilkenney, R., & Kohlberg, L. (1983). Moral development theory and practice for youthful and adult offenders. In W. Lauffer & J. Day (Eds.), Personality theory, moral development and criminal behavior. Lexington: Lexington Books.
12.
Keck, G. C. (1978). A study of correlates of the development of interpersonal maturity and the differential behavioral classification system of the juvenile offender. Dissertation Abstracts International. (University Microfilms No. 8106683)
13.
Kohlberg, L. , Colby, C. A., Gibbs, J., Speicher-Dubin, B., & Candee, D. (1979). Standard form scoring manual. Cambridge: Harvard University.
14.
Levinson, R. (1982). A clarification of classification. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9, 133-142.
15.
Megargee, E. I. , & Bohn, M. J. (1979). Classifying criminal offenders: A new system based on the MMPI. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
Miller, A. (1981). Conceptual matching model and interactional research in education. Review of Educational Research, 51, 33-84.
17.
Palmer, T. B. (1974). The youth authority's community treatment project. Federal Probation, 38, 3-14.
18.
Quay, H. C. (1983). Technical manual for the behavioral classification system for adult offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
19.
Reitsma-Street, M. (1984). Differential treatment of young offenders: A review of the conceptual level match model. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 26, 199-215.
20.
Shipley, W. (1983). Shipley institute of living scale. Institute of Living, Neuro-Psychiatric Institute of the Hartford Retreat.
21.
Sullivan, C. , Grant, M. Q., & Grant, D. (1957). The development of interpersonal maturity: An application to delinquency. Psychiatry, 20, 373-385.
22.
Van Voorhis, P. (1984, November 11). Psychological classification of the adult, male, maximum security inmate: Applications of the MMPI, I-level, conceptual level, and moral judgment. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Cincinnati.
23.
Van Voorhis, P. (1985). Restitution outcome and probationers' assessments of restitution: The effects of moral development. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 259-287.
24.
Warren, M. Q. (1971). Classification of offenders as an aid to efficient management and treatment. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 62, 239-258.
25.
Warren, M. Q. (1983). Applications of interpersonal-maturity theory to offender populations. In W. S. Laufer & J. M. Day (Eds.), Personality theory, moral development, and criminal behavior. Lexington: D. C. Heath.
26.
Warren, M. Q. and the staff of the Community Treatment Project . (1966). Interpersonal maturity level classification: Diagnosis, and treatment of low, middle, and high maturity delinquents. Sacramento: California Youth Authority, Community Treatment Project.
