The interaction of offender type by treatment program was examined within a randomized control group design involving the assignment of 100 adult offenders with alcohol and drug problems to an intensive eight-week group therapy program, and 50 to routine institutional care. Two types of adult offenders were empirically identified by a clustering procedure using eleven personality measures. Although neither group treatment nor offender-type had a significant main effect on three measures of recidivism at one year following release, there was evidence of a treatment by offender-type interaction on two of the recidivism measures. Offenders who were classified high in self-image showed greater improvement in the group therapy program (i.e., fewer reconvictions, and lower reconvicted offense severity), while offenders who were low in self-image did more poorly in group therapy than under institutional care. The results are discussed in terms of the need to develop differential treatment models in the design of correctional programming for adult offenders.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, S.Evaluative research in corrections: A practical guide, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 1975.
2.
Andrews, D.A. , & Kiessling, J. J.Program structure and effective correctional practices: A summary of the CaVIC research. In R. R. Ross and P. Gendreau (Eds.), Effective correctional treatment. Toronto: Butterworths, 1980.
3.
Annis, H. M.Group treatment of incarcerated offenders with alcohol and drug problems: A controlled evaluation . Canadian Journal of Criminology, 1979, 21(1), 3-15.
4.
Annis, H. M.Treatment in corrections: Hoax or salvation . Canadian Psychology, 1982, 22(4), 321-326.
5.
Barkwell, L. J.Differential treatment of juveniles on probation: An evaluative study . Canadian Journal of Criminology and Corrections, 1976, 18(4), 363-378.
6.
Barkwell, L. J.Differential probation treatment of delinquency. In R. R. Ross and P. Gendreau (Eds.), Effective correctional treatment. Toronto: Butterworths, 1980.
7.
Beker, J. , & Heyman, D. S.A critical appraisal of the California differential treatment typology of adolescent offenders. Criminology, 1972, 10, 1-59.
8.
Bennett, L. A.The application of self-esteem measures in a correctional setting: II. Changes in self-esteem during incarceration . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1974, 11, 9-15.
9.
Bennett, L. A. , Sorensen, D. E. and Forshay, H.The application of self-esteem measures in a correctional setting: I. Reliability of the scale and relationship to other measures. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1971, 8(1), 1-10.
10.
Berger, E. M.The relation between expressed acceptance of self and expressed acceptance of others . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1952, 47, 778-782.
11.
Bergin, A. E. , & Lambert, M. J.The evaluation of therapeutic outcomes. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis (2nd ed). Toronto: Wiley, 1978.
12.
Carlson, K. A.Classes of adult offenders: A multivariate approachJournal of Abnormal Psychology, 1972, 79, 84-93.
13.
Cavior, H. E. , & Schmidt, A. A.test of the effectiveness of a differential treatment strategy at the Robert F. Kennedy Center. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1978, 5(2), 131-139.
14.
Clinard, M. N , & Quinney, R.Criminal behavior systems: A typology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.
15.
Coons, W. H. , McEachern, D. L., & Annis, H. M.Generalizations of verbally conditioned self-acceptance to social interaction in small group discussion. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 1970, 2, 105-115.
16.
Fitts, W. H. , & Hamner, W. T.The self concept and delinquency. Nashville Mental Health Center, Nashville, Tennessee, 1969 (Research Monography No. 1).
17.
Gaito, J.Introduction to analysis of variance procedures. New York MSS Information Corporation, 1973.
18.
Gaito, J. , & Firth, J.Procedures for estimating magnitude of effects. Journal of Psychology, 1973, 83, 151-161.
19.
Gendreau, P. , Grant, B. A., & Leipciger, M.Self-esteem, incarceration and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 1979, 6, 67-75.
20.
Giannell, A. S.Giannell's Criminosynthesis theory applied to female homosexualtiy . Journal of Psychology, 1966, 64, 213-219.
21.
Gibbons, D. C.Differential treatment of delinquents and interpersonal maturity levels theory: A critique . Social Service Review, 1970, 44, 22-33.
22.
Glaser, D.Remedies for the key deficiency in criminal justice evaluation research . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1974, 11, 144-154.
23.
Ingram, G. L. , Gerard, R. E., Quay, H. C., & Levinson, R. B.Looking in the correctional wastebasket: An experimental program for psychopathic delinquents. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1970, 7, 24-30.
24.
Jew, C. C. , Kim, L.I.C., & Mattocks, A. L.Effectiveness of group therapy with character disordered prisoners. California Department of Corrections, Research Division, Sacramento, California, 1975 (Research Report No. 56).
25.
Kellar, S. L. , & Carlson, K. A.Development of an index to evaluate programmes in a correctional setting. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Corrections, 1977, 19, 273-277.
26.
Kinch, J. W.Continuities in the study of delinquent types . Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 1962, 53, 323-328.
27.
Lefeber, J. A. The delinquent's self-concept. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1965.
28.
Lerman, P.Community treatment and social control: A critical analysis of juvenile correctional policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1975.
29.
Megargee, E. I.A new classification system for criminal offenders . Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1977, 4, 107-114.
30.
Morris, A.The comprehension classification of adult offenders . Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Policy Science, 1965, 56(2), 197-202.
31.
Palmer, T. B.Differential placement of delinquents in group homes: Final report. Group Home Project, California Youth Authority, Sacramento, California, 1972.
32.
Palmer, T.Martison revisited . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1975, 12, 133-152.
33.
Quay, H. C.Personality dimensions in delinquent males as inferred from factor analysis of behavior ratings . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1964, 1, 33-37.
34.
Quay, H. C.Classification in the treatment of delinquency and antisocial behavior. In N. Hobbs (Ed.), Issues in the classification of children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.
35.
Rezmovic, E. L.Methodological considerations in evaluting correctional effectiveness: Issues and chronic problems. In L. Sechrest, S. O. White, & E. D. Brown (Eds.), The rehabilitation of criminal offenders: Problems and prospects. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1979.
36.
Robison, J. , & Smith, G.The effectiveness of correctional programs. Crime and Delinquency, 1971, 17(1), 67-80.
37.
Roebuck, J. B.Criminal typology: The legalistic, physical-constitutional-hereditary, psychological-psychiatric and sociological approaches. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1967.
38.
Rosenberg, M.Society and adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1967.
39.
Warren, M. Q.The case for differential treatment of delinquents . Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1969, 381, 47-59.
40.
Warren, M. Q.Correctional treatment and coercion: The differential effectiveness perspective . Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 1977, 4, 355-376.
