Despite the importance of perceptions of crime threat and criminal justice institutions in the study of public punitiveness, less is known how they collectively impact capital jurors’ sentencing decisions. Using a vignette survey experiment, this study examined how these perceptions can shape mock jurors’ sentencing decisions in a capital trial. Death-qualified participants (N = 744) from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk recommended a punishment for the defendant after reviewing a randomly assigned trial summary where aggravating characteristics and defendant race/ethnicity were varied. Mock jurors with heightened perceived crime threat were more likely to support punitive sentencing decisions. Although distrust about the crime control capabilities of criminal justice institutions did not directly influence sentencing decisions, its effect was significant through its associations with perceived crime threat. Findings highlight the important roles of jurors’ perceptions of crime threat and criminal justice institutions in shaping their decisions.
AbbottJ.McGrathS. A.MayD. C. (2020). The effects of police effort on victims’ fear of crime. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(5), 880–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09523-7
2.
AldaE.BennettR. R.MorabitoM. S. (2017). Confidence in the police and the fear of crime in the developing world. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 40(2), 366–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-03-2016-0045
3.
AnwarS.BayerP.HjalmarssonR. (2012). The impact of jury race in criminal trials. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(2), 1017–1055. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs014
4.
BaragerR. T.ThompsonL. E.PozzuloJ. (2025). Perceptions in a sexual assault trial: The influence of age and race on Canadian mock-jurors. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 40(1), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-024-09721-7
5.
BarrettL. F.AtzilS.Bliss-MoreauE.ChanesL.GendronM.HoemannK.KatsumiY.KlecknerI. R.LindquistK. A.QuigleyK. S.SatputeA. B.SenneshE.ShafferC.TheriaultJ. E.TugadeM.WestlinC. (2025). The theory of constructed emotion: More than a feeling. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 20(3), 392–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916251319045
BrownE. K.SociaK. M. (2017). Twenty-first century punitiveness: Social sources of punitive American views reconsidered. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(4), 935–959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9319-4
8.
CostelloeM. T.ChiricosT.GertzM. (2009). Punitive attitudes toward criminals: Exploring the relevance of crime salience and economic insecurity. Punishment & Society, 11(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474508098131
9.
CullenF. T.ClarkG. A.CullenJ. B.MathersR. A. (1985). Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 12(3), 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/009385488501200300
10.
CundiffP. R.AlwinD. F. (2015). Changing beliefs about crime and punishment in American Society. Journal of Law and Criminal Justice, 3(1), 2374–2682. http://dx.doi.org/10.15640/jlcj.v3n1a4
11.
DaveyC. B.MulrooneyK. J.WattS. E. (2024). Exploring individual-level predictors of punitive attitudes in Australia. Psychology, Crime & Law. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2024.2338200
12.
DevineD. J.CaughlinD. E. (2014). Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000006
13.
DevineD. J.KellyC. E. (2015). Life or death: An examination of jury sentencing with the Capital Jury Project database. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(4), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000060
14.
EberhardtJ. L.DaviesP. G.Purdie-VaughnsV. J.JohnsonS. L. (2006). Looking deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of Black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17(5), 383–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01716.x
15.
FarrellA.PenningtonL.CroninS. (2013). Juror perceptions of the legitimacy of legal authorities and decision making in criminal cases. Law & Social Inquiry, 38(4), 773–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01323.x
16.
FerraroK. F. (1995). Measuring risk and fear of crime. In FerraroK. F. (Ed.), Fear of crime: Interpreting victimization risk (pp. 21–39). State University of New York Press.
17.
FlexonJ. L. (2011). Fear, views of human nature, and the potential consequences for capital juries. Justice Policy Journal, 8(2), 2–29.
18.
GarrettB. (2017). End of its rope: How killing the death penalty can revive criminal justice. Harvard University Press.
19.
GarveyS. P. (1998). Aggravation and mitigation in capital cases: What do jurors think?Columbia Law Review, 98(6), 1538–1576. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123305
20.
HammJ. A.WylieL. E.BrankE. (2018). Measuring older adult confidence in the courts and law enforcement. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(3), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403415623034
21.
HildenbrandA.ThompsonL. E.PozzuloJ.SherrattK. (2025). Mock-juror decision-making: The influence of inconsistencies, situation type, and defendant and victim race. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-025-09733-x
22.
JacksonJ. (2009). A psychological perspective on vulnerability in the fear of crime. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(4), 365–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802275797
23.
JacksonJ.BradfordB. (2009). Crime, policing and social order: On the expressive nature of public confidence in policing. The British Journal of Sociology, 60(3), 493–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01253.x
24.
KeilT. J.VitoG. F. (1991). Fear of crime and attitudes toward capital punishment: A structural equations model. Justice Quarterly, 8(4), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829100091161
25.
KingA.MarunaS. (2009). Is a conservative just a liberal who has been mugged? Exploring the origins of punitive views. Punishment & Society, 11(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474508101490
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Publications.
28.
Kort-ButlerL. A.RayC. M. (2019). Public support for the death penalty in a red state: The distrustful, the angry, and the unsure. Punishment & Society, 21(4), 473–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474518795896
29.
LopesC.De SotoW.RibeiroE.GonzalezJ. (2022). Public opinion on the death penalty in Latin America: Exploring the individuals determinants in 11 jurisdictions. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 46(4), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2021.1995889
30.
LynchM.HaneyC. (2015). Emotion, authority, and death: (Raced) negotiations in mock capital jury deliberations. Law & Social Inquiry, 40(2), 377–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12099
31.
LytleD. J.RandaR. (2015). The effects of police satisfaction on fear of crime in a semirural setting. International Criminal Justice Review, 25(4), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567715596048
32.
MessnerS. F.BaumerE. P.RosenfeldR. (2006). Distrust of government, the vigilante tradition, and support for capital punishment. Law & Society Review, 40(3), 559–590.
33.
MitchellT. L.HawR. M.PfeiferJ. E.MeissnerC. A. (2005). Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: A meta-analytic review of defendant treatment. Law and Human Behavior, 29(6), 621–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-8122-9
34.
PozzuloJ. D.DempseyJ.MaederE.AllenL. (2010). The effects of victim gender, defendant gender, and defendant age on juror decision making. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809344173
35.
PryceD. K.FullerK.BrownR. A.VanEatonT. (2020). Examining the relationship between citizen contact with the community prosecutor and fear of crime. Victims & Offenders, 15(5), 574–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2020.1754312
36.
PyoJ. (2023). Confidence in criminal justice and judgments of guilt in criminal trials. Criminology & Criminal Justice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895823120552
37.
PyoJ.HayesB. E. (2023). Assessment of functional and dysfunctional perceived threat of hate crimes among persons with and without disability. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(23–24), 12135–12160. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231191236
38.
RaderN. E. (2004). The threat of victimization: A theoretical reconceptualization of fear of crime. Sociological Spectrum, 24(6), 689–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732170490467936
39.
RichardsT. N.BjerregaardB. E.CochranJ.SmithM. D.FogelS. J. (2016). Predictors of death sentencing for minority, equal, and majority female juries in capital murder trials. Women & Criminal Justice, 26(4), 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2015.1115802
40.
SeltzerR.McCormickI. I. J. P. (1987). The impact of crime victimization and fear of crime on attitudes toward death penalty defendants. Violence and Victims, 2(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.2.2.99
41.
ShiL. (2022). Crime trend perceptions, negative emotions, and public punitiveness: A survey experiment of information treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 18, 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09454-7
42.
SkoganW. G. (2009). Concern about crime and confidence in the police: Reassurance or accountability?Police Quarterly, 12(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611109339893
43.
SpiranovicC. A.RobertsL. D.IndermaurD. (2012). What predicts punitiveness? An examination of predictors of punitive attitudes towards offenders in Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 19(2), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2011.561766
van HeijstK.KretM. E.PloegerA. (2025). Basic emotions or constructed emotions: Insights from taking an evolutionary perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 20(3), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231205186
46.
VaughanT. J.Bell HolleranL.SilverJ. R. (2019). Applying moral foundations theory to the explanation of capital jurors’ sentencing decisions. Justice Quarterly, 36(7), 1176–1205. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1537400
47.
Wainwright v. Witt. (1985). 469 U.S. 412.
48.
WestM. P.WoodE. F.MillerM. K.BornsteinB. H. (2021). How mock jurors’ cognitive processing and defendants’ immigrant status and ethnicity relate to decisions in capital trials. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 17(3), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09411-4
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
