The management of police misconduct is pivotal to preserving the internal and external legitimacy of policing. Preventing misconduct relies upon a good understanding of the nature and characteristics of misconduct-prone officers. This research analyzes latent typologies of officers, who have committed career ending misconduct, in agencies from the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia. Typologies from the United Kingdom and Australia were exceptionally similar, emerging among (a) younger, less experienced officers, and (b) older, more experienced officers. Officers prone to career ending misconduct in the United States appeared more uniform, with typologies principally based on civilian characteristics and use of force. Findings support research suggesting that, while minor misconduct may be more prevalent among younger officers, the profile of officers who committed career-ending misconduct may be more linked to life-course factors than experience levels. This research holds implications for the measurement of police misconduct, and management and prevention approaches.
AdepejuM.LangtonS.BannisterJ. (2021). Anchored k-medoids: A novel adaptation of k-medoids further refined to measure long-term instability in the exposure to crime. Journal of Computational Social Science, 4, 655–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-021-00103-1
2.
AdolfssonA.AckermanM.BrownsteinN. (2019). To cluster, or not to cluster: An analysis of clusterability methods. Pattern Recognition, 88, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2018.10.026
3.
AldahdoohR. T.AshourW. M. (2013). DIMK-means: Distance-based initialization method for K-means clustering algorithm. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 2, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijisa.2013.02.05
4.
AnithaP.PatilM. M. (2022). RFM model for customer purchase behavior using k-means algorithm. Journal of King Saud University—Computer and Information Sciences, 34, 1785–1792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.12.011
5.
ArchboldC. A.MaguireE. R. (2002). Studying civil suits against the police: A serendipitous finding of sample selection bias. Police Quarterly, 5(2), 222–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/109861102129198110
6.
BanerjeeA.DaveR. N. (2004, December). Validating clusters using the Hopkins statistic [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Budapest, Hungary. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.2004.1375706
7.
BarkerT.CarterD. L. (1994). Typology of police deviance. In BarkerT.CarterD. L. (Eds.), Police deviance (3rd ed., pp. 3–12). Anderson Publishing Co.
8.
BatoolF.HennigC. (2021). Clustering with the average silhouette width. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 158, 107190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2021.107190
9.
BishoppS. A.WorrallJ.PiqueroN. L. (2016). General strain and police misconduct: The role of organizational influence. Policing: An International Journal, 39(4), 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-10-2015-0122
10.
BoraD. J.GuptaA. K. (2014). Effect of different distance measures on the performance of K-means algorithm: An experimental study in Matlab. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 5(2), 2501–2506. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1405.7471
11.
BrennanT.OliverW. L. (2013). The emergence of machine learning techniques in criminology. Criminology & Public Policy, 12(3), 551–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12055
12.
BriodyM.PrenzlerT. (2020). The New Zealand Police early intervention system: A review of implementation and impact issues. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 22(3), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461355720931891
13.
BruscoM. J.ShiremanE.SteinleyD. (2017). A comparison of latent class, k-means, and k-median methods for clustering dichotomous data. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000095
CubittT. I. C. (2023). Using network analytics to improve targeted disruption of police misconduct. Police Quarterly, 26(1), 24–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111211057212
CubittT. I. C.GaubJ. E.HoltfreterK. (2022). Gender differences in serious police misconduct: A machine-learning analysis of the New York Police Department (NYPD). Journal of Criminal Justice, 82, 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101976
18.
CubittT. I. C.JudgesS. J. H. (2018). Show cause analysis: A qualitative assessment of the factors influencing police misconduct from the perspective of the officers who commit it. Policing: An International Journal, 41(6), 782–797. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-06-2017-0079
19.
CubittT. I. C.WoodenK. R.RobertsK. A. (2020). A machine learning analysis of serious misconduct among Australian police. Crime Science, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-020-00133-6
20.
FrakeJ.HarmonD. (2023). Intergenerational transmission of organizational misconduct: Evidence from the Chicago Police Department. Management Science, 70(6), 3856–3878. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.00580
21.
GaubJ. E. (2020). Understanding police misconduct correlates: Does gender matter in predicting career-ending misconduct?Women and Criminal Justice, 30(4), 264–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2019.1605561
22.
GaubJ. E.HoltfreterK. (2022). Keeping the women out: A gendered organizational approach to understanding early career-ending police misconduct. Crime and Delinquency, 68(5), 892–915. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128721999332
23.
GrahamA.PickettJ. T.CullenF. T. (2024). How does the public explain police misconduct? Race, politics, and attributions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 51(9), 1299–1319. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548241253737
24.
GrazianoL. M.GauthierJ. F. (2019). Examining the racial-ethnic continuum and perceptions of police misconduct. Policing and Society, 29(6), 657–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2017.1310859
25.
GullionC. L.KingW. R. (2020). Early intervention systems for police: A state-of-the-art review. Policing: An International Journal, 43(4), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-02-2020-0027
26.
HaarrR. N.MorashM. (1999). Gender, race, and strategies of coping with occupational stress in policing. Justice Quarterly, 16(2), 303–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829900094151
27.
HarrisC. J. (2010). Problem officers? Analyzing problem behavior patterns from a large cohort. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(2), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.01.003
HarrisC. J. (2014). The onset of police misconduct. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 37(2), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-01-2012-0043
30.
HuffJ.WhiteM. D.DeckerS. H. (2018). Organizational correlates of police deviance: A statewide analysis of misconduct in Arizona, 2000-2011. Policing An International Journal, 41(1), 465–481.
KaneR. J.WhiteM. D. (2009). Bad cops: A study of career-ending misconduct among New York City police officers. Criminology & Public Policy, 8(4), 737–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00591.x
33.
KaneR. J.WhiteM. D. (2013). Jammed up: Bad cops, police misconduct, and the New York Police Department. New York University Press.
34.
KappelerV. E.SluderR. D.AlpertG. P. (1998). Forces of deviance: Understanding the dark side of policing (2nd ed.). Waveland Press.
LletiR.OrtizM. C.SarabiaL. A.SanchezM. S. (2004). Selecting variables for k-means cluster analysis by using a genetic algorithm that optimizes the silhouettes. Analytica Chimica Acta, 515(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2003.12.020
MaheswariK. (2019). Finding the best possible number of clusters using the k-means algorithm. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 9, 533–538. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.a1119.1291s419
McElvainJ. P.KposowaA. J. (2008). Police officer characteristics and the likelihood of using deadly force. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(4), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854807313995
41.
Mollen Commission. (1994). Commission to investigate allegations of police corruption and the anti-corruption procedures of the police department: Report.
42.
MrozlaT.HuynhC.ArchboldC. A. (2021). What took you so long? An examination of reporting time and police misconduct complaint dispositions. Deviant Behavior, 43(7), 852–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2021.1919497
43.
NiederhofferA. (1967). Behind the shield: The police in urban society. Doubleday.
OuelletM.HashimiS.GravelJ.PapachristosA. V. (2019). Network exposure and excessive use of force: Investigating the social transmission of police misconduct. Criminology and Public Policy, 18(3), 675–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12459
46.
PogarskyG. (2007). Deterrence and individual differences among convicted offenders. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-006-9019-6
47.
PogarskyG.PiqueroA. R. (2004). Studying the reach of deterrence: Can deterrence theory help explain police misconduct?Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(4), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.04.007
RahmanA. S.RahmanA. (2020). Application of Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis in Regional Flood Frequency Analysis: A Case Study in New South Wales, Australia. Water, 12(3), 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030781
50.
RojekJ. J.DeckerS. H. (2009). Examining racial disparity in the police discipline process. Police Quarterly, 12(4), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611109348470
51.
RothwellG. R.BaldwinJ. N. (2007). Whistle-blowing and the code of silence in police agencies: Policy and structural predictors. Crime & Delinquency, 53(4), 605–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128706295048
52.
RousseeuwP. J. (1987). Silhouettes—a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster-analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7
53.
RozemaK.SchanzenbachM. M. (2018). Good cop, bad cop: Using civilian allegations to predict police misconduct (WP18-21). Northwestern Institute for Policy Research.
54.
SethurajuR.SoleJ.OliverB. E.PrewP. (2019). Perceptions of police misconduct among university students: Do race and academic major matter?Race and Justice, 9(2), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368716689709
55.
ShermanL. W. (1974). Police corruption: A sociological perspective. Anchor Books.
56.
ShjarbackJ. A. (2015). Emerging early intervention systems: An agency-specific pre-post comparison of formal citizen complaints of use of force. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 9(4), 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pav006
57.
SimpsonC. R.KirkD. S. (2023). Is police misconduct contagious? Non-trivial null findings from Dallas, Texas. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 39(2), 425–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-021-09532-7
58.
SimpsonS. S.PiqueroN. L. (2002). Low self-control, organizational theory, and corporate crime. Law & Society Review, 36(3), 509–547. https://doi.org/10.2307/1512161
59.
WalkerS.AlpertG. P.KenneyD. J. (2000). Early warning systems for police: Concept, history, and issues. Police Quarterly, 3(2), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611100003002001
WhiteM. D.KaneR. J. (2013). Pathways to career-ending police misconduct: An examination of patterns, timing, and organizational responses to officer malfeasance in the NYPD. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(11), 1301–1325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813486269
63.
WierzchońS. T.KłopotekM. (2018). Modern algorithms of cluster analysis. Springer.
64.
WolfeS. E.PiqueroA. R. (2011). Organizational justice and police misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(4), 332–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810397739
