Research on social dynamics and social networks has long informed how researchers and practitioners make sense of positive and negative influences on individuals’ behaviors. Research on supportive network members and the role dynamics shared with parents, peers, and romantic partners have been central to empirical and theoretical contributions. Notably, the operationalization of social relationships has not changed much over the years. Scholars have primarily relied upon measures embedded in risk assessment tools or interview data about supportive ties. However, these approaches are not designed to assess individuals’ social capital, clarify mobilization strategies for support, or inform whether compositional and structural network characteristics (and changes) affect correctional experiences. This essay highlights the contributions of extant research on social relationships during probation and parole supervision and identifies ways that advancements in personal (egocentric) social network methods could aid in crafting research, policies, and practices that center equity and inform community-based solutions.
BergM. T.HuebnerB. M. (2011). Reentry and the ties that bind: An examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28(2), 382–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2010.498383
4.
BirkettM.MelvilleJ.JanulisP.PhillipsG.II.ContractorN.HoganB. (2021). Network Canvas: Key decisions in the design of an interviewer-assisted network data collection software suite. Social Networks, 66, 114–124.
5.
BomanJ. H.IV.MowenT. J. (2017). Building the ties that bind, breaking the ties that don’t: Family support, criminal peers, and reentry success. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(3), 753–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12307
6.
BourdieuP.RichardsonJ. G. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education(pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
7.
BronfenbrennerU. (2000). Ecological systems theory. American Psychological Association.
8.
BuiH. N.MorashM. (2010). The impact of network relationships, prison experiences, and internal transformation on women’s success after prison release. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670903435381
9.
BungerA. C.Yousefi-NooraieR.WarrenK.CaoQ.DadgostarP.BustosT. E. (2023). Developing a typology of network alteration strategies for implementation: A scoping review and iterative synthesis. Implementation Science, 18(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01266-3
CaspiA.LynamD.MoffittT. E.SilvaP. A. (1993). Unraveling girls’ delinquency: Biological, dispositional, and contextual contributions to adolescent misbehavior. In LernerR. M.LernerR. M.OhannessianC. M. (Eds.), Risks and problem behaviors in adolescence (pp. 293–304). Routledge.
13.
ChildS.RuppelE. H.ZhongM.LawtonL. (2021). Direct and moderating causal effects of network support on sleep quality: Findings from the UC Berkeley social network study. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 55(5), 446–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaaa082
14.
ChildS. T.LawtonL. E. (2020). Personal networks and associations with psychological distress among young and older adults. Social Science & Medicine, 246, 112714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112714
15.
CloneS.DeHartD. (2014). Social support networks of incarcerated women: Types of support, sources of support, and implications for reentry. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53(7), 503–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2014.944742
16.
CobbinaJ. E.MorashM.KashyD. A.SmithS. W. (2014). Race, neighborhood context, and strategies to avoid victimization among female probationers and parolees. Race and Justice, 4(4), 358–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368714540536
17.
CobbinaJ. E.HuebnerB. M.BergM. T. (2012). Men, women, and postrelease offending: An examination of the nature of the link between relational ties and recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 58(3), 331–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/001112871038234
18.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
19.
ConnorsG. J.DiClementeC. C.DermenK. H.KaddenR.CarrollK. M.FroneM. R. (2000). Predicting the therapeutic alliance in alcoholism treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61(1), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2000.61.139
20.
FahmyC.WallaceD. (2019). The influence of familial social support on physical health during reentry. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(12), 1738–1756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854819870268
21.
FosterK. A.MaasC. D. (2016). An exploratory factor analysis of the resource generator-United States: A social capital measure. The British Journal of Social Work, 46(1), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu111
22.
GoodsonM. V. (2018). Help or hindrance: Female probationers’ navigation of supervision requirements through personal support networks. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(10), 1483–1506. https://doi.org/10.1177/009385481878143
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
25.
HardingD. J.WyseJ. J.DobsonC.MorenoffJ. D. (2014). Making ends meet after prison. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(2), 440–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21741
26.
HaynieD. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter?American Journal of Sociology, 106(4), 1013–1057. https://doi.org/10.1086/320298
27.
HolzerH. J.RaphaelS.StollM. A. (2007). The effect of an applicant’s criminal history on employer hiring decisions and screening practices: Evidence from Los Angeles. Barriers to Reentry, 4(15), 117–150.
KreagerD. A.YoungJ. T.HaynieD. L.BouchardM.SchaeferD. R.ZajacG. (2017). Where “old heads” prevail: Inmate hierarchy in a men’s prison unit. American Sociological Review, 82(4), 685–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417710462
LeverentzA. M. (2006). The love of a good man? Romantic relationships as a source of support or hindrance for female ex-offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(4), 459–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427806293323
32.
LinN. (1986). Conceptualizing social support. In LinN.DeanA.EnselW. M. (Eds.), Social support, life events, and depression (pp. 17–30). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-11093-8
33.
LinN. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action (Vol. 19). Cambridge University Press.
34.
LinN. (2008). A network theory of social capital. In CastiglioneD.Van DethJ. W.WollebG. (Eds.), The handbook of social capital (pp. 50–69). Oxford University Press.
LinN.FuY-cHsungR.-M. (2001). Measurement techniques for investigations of social capital. In LinN.CookK.BurtR. S. (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 57–81). Routledge.
37.
LiuL.BeckerP.MowenT. J. (2023). Social support during reentry: Family, mentor, religious, parole officer, and social service roles. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 50(7), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231166154
38.
MalcomeM. L. D.FedockG.GartheR. C.GolderS.HigginsG.LoganT. K. (2019). Weathering probation and parole: The protective role of social support on Black women’s recent stressful events and depressive symptoms. Journal of Black Psychology, 45(8), 661–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798419889755
39.
MarsdenP. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52, 122–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095397
MarsdenP. V.HollsteinB. (2023). Advances and innovations in methods for collecting egocentric network data. Social Science Research, 109, 102816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102816
42.
McCallisterL.FischerC. S. (1978). A procedure for surveying personal networks. Sociological Methods & Research, 7(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912417800700202
43.
McCarthyB.HaganJ. (1995). Getting into street crime: The structure and process of criminal embeddedness. Social Science Research, 24(1), 63–95. https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1995.1003
44.
MooreG. (1990). Structural determinants of men’s and women’s personal networks. American Sociological Review, 55, 726–735. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2095868
45.
MowenT. J.VisherC. A. (2015). Drug use and crime after incarceration: The role of family support and family conflict. Justice Quarterly, 32(2), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2013.771207
46.
Northcutt BohmertM. (2016). The role of transportation disadvantage for women on community supervision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(11), 1522–1540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816654267
47.
PagerD. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975. https://doi.org/10.1086/374403
48.
PapachristosA. V.BragaA. A.PizaE.GrossmanL. S. (2015). The company you keep? The spillover effects of gang membership on individual gunshot victimization in a co-offending network. Criminology, 53(4), 624–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12091
ParsonsM. L.Warner-RobbinsC. (2002). Factors that support women’s successful transition to the community following jail/prison. Health Care for Women International, 23(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/073993302753428393
51.
PerryB. L.PescosolidoB. A.BorgattiS. P. (2018). Egocentric network analysis: Foundations, methods, and models (Vol. 44). Cambridge University Press.
52.
PetersiliaJ. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford University Press.
53.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
54.
ReisigM. D.HoltfreterK.MorashM. (2002). Social capital among women offenders: Examining the distribution of social networks and resources. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 18(2), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986202018002004
55.
SandersK.HoskinsK.MorashM. (2023). A first step in understanding influences on system-involved women’s changes in financial need. Feminist Criminology, 18, 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851231176856
56.
SentseM.de VriesI.NieuwbeertaP. (2022). A dyadic analysis of social network stability before and after incarceration. Journal of Criminal Justice, 82, 101994.
57.
SimondsR. (2024). An early social support network analysis of men facing reentry. Journal of Criminal Justice, 94, 102255.
58.
SmallM. L.PerryB. L.PescosolidoB.SmithE. B. (2021). Personal networks: Classic readings and new directions in egocentric analysis. Cambridge University Press.
59.
SmithK. P.ChristakisN. A. (2008). Social networks and health. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 405–429.
60.
SongL.PettisP. J.ChenY.Goodson-MillerM. (2021). Social cost and health: The downside of social relationships and social networks. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 62(3), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221465211029353
61.
SpohrS. A.SuzukiS.MarshallB.TaxmanF. S.WaltersS. T. (2016). Social support quality and availability affects risk behaviors in offenders. Health & Justice, 4, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-016-0033-y
62.
StoneR.MorashM.GoodsonM.SmithS.CobbinaJ. (2018). Women on parole, identity processes, and primary desistance. Feminist Criminology, 13(4), 382–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116670004
ValeraP.ChangY.HernándezD.CooperJ. (2015). Exploring kinship and social support in women with criminal justice backgrounds. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 54(4), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2015.1025178
65.
Van der GaagM.SnijdersT. A.FlapH. D. (2004). Position generator measures and their relationship to other social capital measures. In LinN.EricksonB. (Eds.), Social capital: An international research program (pp. 27–49). Oxford University Press.
66.
Van Der GaagM.SnijdersT. A. B. (2005). The resource generator: Social capital quantification with concrete items. Social Networks, 27(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.10.001
67.
VisherC.YahnerJ.La VigneN. G. (2010). Life after prison: Tracking the experiences of male prisoners returning to Chicago, Cleveland, and Houston. Urban Institute.
68.
WebberM. P.HuxleyP. J. (2007). Measuring access to social capital: The validity and reliability of the Resource Generator-UK and its association with common mental disorder. Social Science & Medicine, 65(3), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.030
69.
WeissJ.LawtonL. E.FischerC. S. (2022). Life course transitions and changes in network ties among younger and older adults. Advances in Life Course Research, 52, 100478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2022.100478
70.
WellmanB.FrankK. A. (2001). Network capital in a multilevel world: Getting support from personal communities. In LinN.CookK.BurtR. S. (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 233–273). Routledge.
71.
WellmanB.HoganB.BergK.BoaseJ.CarrascoJ.-A.CôtéR.KayaharaJ.KennedyT. L.TranP. (2006). Connected lives: The project. In PurcellP. (Ed.) Networked Neighbourhoods: The connected community in context (pp. 161–216). Springer.
72.
WesternB.SiroisC. (2019). Racialized re-entry: Labor market inequality after incarceration. Social Forces, 97(4), 1517–1542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soy096
73.
WooditchA.TangL. L.TaxmanF. S. (2014). Which criminogenic need changes are most important in promoting desistance from crime and substance use?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(3), 276–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813503543
74.
WrightE. M.DeHartD. D.Koons-WittB. A.CrittendenC. A. (2013). “Buffers” against crime? Exploring the roles and limitations of positive relationships among women in prison. Punishment & Society, 15(1), 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474512466199
