In China, the widespread implementation of community corrections is a key strategy designed to reduce the burden on the criminal justice system. This strategy prominently features social participation as a critical element. This study delves into the effects of social participation on correctional practices by conducting in-depth interviews with a diverse group of stakeholders, including community corrections officials, judicial police, community workers, and counselors. Our findings reveal a predominant government-led approach to social participation, where government-funded social organizations play a major role. The research also highlights significant role conflicts and jurisdictional ambiguities within the system, which may arise from unclear criminal policies. These conflicts and ambiguities underline the challenges in the current implementation of community corrections. By examining these dynamics, the study suggests that refining the government-led model of social participation could provide more effective strategies for enhancing civic engagement and improving the efficacy of community correction.
BontaJ. (2023). Training community supervision officers in the risk-need-responsivity model of offender rehabilitation: A review and implications. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 62(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2022.2158986
2.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and becoming a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
3.
CaiY. (2008). Power structure and regime resilience: Contentious politics in China. British Journal of Political Science, 38(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000215
4.
ChenG.WangZ. (2021). Climbing to the top? How globalized competition for capital affects judicial independence. Studies in Comparative International Development, 56, 511–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-021-09345-6
DavisC.BahrS. J.WardC. (2013). The process of offender reintegration: Perceptions of what helps prisoners renter society. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 13(4), 446–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895812454748
8.
DeMicheleM. (2014). Studying the community corrections field: Applying neo-institutional theories to a hidden element of mass social control. Theoretical Criminology, 18(4), 546–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480614526276
GordonH.KeltyS. F.JulianR. (2015). An evaluation of the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory in an Australian community corrections environment. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(2), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2014.941090
IrwinD. D.ZhangD.WangS. (2016). China’s social transformation and the development of rural community corrections. In The Routledge international handbook of rural criminology (pp. 419–428). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315755885
14.
JiangJ.LiuJ. (2022). Penal welfare or penal sovereignty? A political sociology of recent formalization of Chinese community corrections. Punishment & Society, 24(4), 501–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745221079793
15.
JiangS.XiangD.ChenQ.Goodlin-FahnckeW.HuangC.YangS.ZhaoA. (2015). Public support of community corrections in China. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(7), 772–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X13518381
16.
JiangS.ZhangD.LambertE. G. (2022). Views of community corrections supervision and their predictors: An officer and offender comparison. The Prison Journal, 102(1), 84–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855211069305
17.
KallioH.PietiläA. M.JohnsonM.KangasniemiM. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
18.
KratcoskiP. C. (2023). Administration of probation, parole, and other community-based sanctions. In Juvenile justice administration: Processes and issues (pp. 215–239). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19515-0_11
19.
LeonardL.KennyP. (2010). The restorative justice movement in Ireland: Building bridges to social justice through civil society. Irish Journal of Sociology, 18(2), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.7227/IJS.18.2.4
20.
LiE. (2015). China’s community corrections: an actuarial model of punishment. Crime, Law & Social Change, 64(1), 1–22.
21.
LinK.WongC. K. (2013). Social policy and social order in East Asia: An evolutionary view. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 23(4), 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2013.778785
22.
LiuY.ZhangZ.ChenF. (2023). The effect of nine-in-one-drawing therapy on anxiety, depression, and psychological resilience of community correction objects. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X231170115
23.
LofstromM.RaphaelS. (2016). Crime, the criminal justice system, and socioeconomic inequality. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(2), 103–126. https://doi.10.1257/jep.30.2.103
24.
MillerJ. M. (2014). Identifying collateral effects of offender reentry programming through evaluative fieldwork. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-013-9206-6
25.
Ministry of Justice. (2019). Community correction law of the People’s Republic of China (Order No. 40 of the President of the People's Republic of China). Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-12/28/content_5464764.htm
26.
NansiW. S. (2021). Strengthening community participation in prevention of corruption through the regulation integrated participative correctional institutions. Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, 6(1), 119–133. https://doi.org//10.32801/lamlaj.v6i1.245
27.
PageJ.RobertsonN. (2022). Extent and predictors of work-related distress in community correction officers: A systematic review. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 29(2), 155–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1894259
28.
PolaschekD. L. (2012). An appraisal of the risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and its application in correctional treatment. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02038.x
29.
ReichmanN. (2020). Managing crime risks: Toward an insurance based model of social control. In Risk management (pp. 45–66). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429284243
30.
RudesD. S.PortilloS.TaxmanF. S. (2021). The legitimacy of change: Adopting/adapting, implementing and sustaining reforms within community corrections agencies. The British Journal of Criminology, 61(6), 1665–1683. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azab020
31.
ShaoguangW. (2019). Central-local fiscal politics in China. In Changing central-local relations in China (pp. 91–112). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038761
ViglioneJ.AlwardL. M.LockwoodA.BrysonS. (2021). Adaptations to covid-19 in community corrections agencies across the United States. In The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on institutional and community corrections (pp. 458–478). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003189572
WongD. S.FungC. S. (2023). Juvenile community corrections in China: The quest for a restorative approach. Asian Journal of Criminology, 18(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-022-09381-8
36.
YangW.LeiX. (2019). Ideal and reality: The reform of juvenile sealed criminal records in China. Chinese Studies, 8(4), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.4236/chnstd.2019.84017
ZhaoY.MessnerS. F.LiuJ. (2020). The influence of importation and deprivation factors on prison adaptation: Insights from Chinese prisons. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 63, 100425.
39.
ZhouY.LiS. (2021). Can the innovative-city-pilot policy promote urban innovation? An empirical analysis from China. Journal of Urban Affairs, 45(9), 1679–1697. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2021.1969243
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
