Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-6
Humane Interrogation Strategies Are Associated With Confessions,Cooperation,and Disclosure: Evidence From a Field Study of Incarcerated Individuals in the United States
The techniques used to interrogate individuals suspected of a crime can profoundly impact their decisions to confess, cooperate, or disclose information. Research using different methods suggests that two prevailing interrogation approaches—accusatorial and information-gathering—differentially impact interrogation outcomes. However, confession, cooperation, and information disclosure are ultimately the suspected person’s decision, yet few studies directly examine their perspectives about how interrogation techniques affect their decisions, and none examine a U.S. sample. This study assessed how interrogation strategies characterized by humanity, rapport, confrontation, and dominance/control predicted interrogation outcomes in a sample of 249 individuals incarcerated in two U.S. jails. Respondents who reported experiencing humane strategies were more likely to confess, cooperate completely, and disclose incriminating information. Dominance/control-oriented strategies predicted partial confession (but not cooperation or disclosure), and rapport-based and confrontational techniques did not predict outcomes. Findings highlight humane interrogation strategies as likely the most productive strategies to adopt in criminal interrogations.
ApplebyS. C.HaselL. E.KassinS. M. (2013). Police-induced confessions: An empirical analysis of their content and impact. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.613389
2.
ApplebyS. C.KassinS. M. (2016). When self-report trumps science: Effects of confessions, DNA, and prosecutorial theories on perceptions of guilt. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000080.supp
3.
BrimbalL.MeissnerC. A.KleinmanS. M.PhillipsE. L.AtkinsonD. J.DianiskaR. E.RothweilerJ. N.OleszkiewiczS.JonesM. S. (2021). Evaluating the benefits of a rapport-based approach to investigative interviews: A training study with law enforcement investigators. Law and Human Behavior, 45(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000437
4.
BullR.MilneB. (2004). Attempts to improve police interviewing of suspects. In LassiterG. D. (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions and entrapment (pp. 181–196). Plenum.
5.
BullR.RachlewA. (2020). Investigative interviewing: From England to Norway and beyond. In BarelaS. J.FallonM.GaggioliG. (Eds.), Interrogation and torture (pp. 171–196). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190097523.001.0001
ClearyH. M. D.BullR. (2021). Contextual factors predict self-reported confession decision-making: A field study of suspects’ actual police interrogation experiences. Law and Human Behavior, 45(4), 310–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000459
8.
ClearyH. M. D.WarnerT. C. (2016). Police training in interviewing and interrogation methods: A comparison of techniques used with adult and juvenile suspects. Law and Human Behavior, 40(3), 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000175
9.
CroughQ.Dion LarivièreC.SnowM. D.EastwoodJ. (2022). Reflections on the nature of rapport within suspect interviews. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 34(2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2021.2018814
10.
Deslauriers-VarinN.BeauregardE.WongJ. (2011). Changing their mind about confessing to police: The role of contextual factors in crime confession. Police Quarterly, 14(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611110392721
11.
EvansJ. R.MeissnerC. A.RossA. B.HoustonK. A.RussanoM. B.HorganA. J. (2013). Obtaining guilty knowledge in human intelligence interrogations: Comparing accusatorial and information-gathering approaches with a novel experimental paradigm. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.03.002
12.
FennE.GroszC.Blandón-GitlinI. (2019). Interviewing and interrogating minority suspects: Psychological science can help improve the process and outcomes. In BullR.Blandón-GitlinI. (Eds.), The Routledge International handbook of legal and investigative psychology (pp. 116–132). Routledge.
13.
FieldA. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Los Angeles: Sage.
14.
GabbertF.HopeL.LutherK.WrightG.NgM.OxburghG. (2021). Exploring the use of rapport in professional information-gathering contexts by systematically mapping the evidence base. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3762
Goodman-DelahuntyJ.MartschukN.DhamiM. K. (2014). Interviewing high value detainees: Securing cooperation and disclosures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3087
17.
HäkkänenH.AskK.KebbellM.AlisonL.GranhagP. A. (2009). Police officers’ views of effective interview tactics with suspects: The effects of weight of case evidence and discomfort with ambiguity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(4), 468–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1491
18.
HolmbergU.ChristiansonS.-Å. (2002). Murderers’ and sexual offenders’ experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20(1–2), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.470
19.
InbauF. E.ReidJ. E.BuckleyJ. P.JayneB. C. (2013). Criminal interrogation and confessions (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
20.
Jones-BrownD.WilliamsJ. M. (2021). Over-policing Black bodies: The need for multidimensional and transformative reforms. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 19(3–4), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2021.1992326
21.
KassinS. M.DrizinS. A.GrissoT.GudjonssonG. H.LeoR. A.RedlichA. D. (2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior, 34(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6
22.
KebbellM.AlisonL.HurrenE. (2008). Sex offenders’ perceptions of the effectiveness and fairness of humanity, dominance, and displaying an understanding of cognitive distortions in police interviews: A vignette study. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14(5), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160801950523
23.
KebbellM.AlisonL.HurrenE.MazerolleP. (2010). How do sex offenders think the police should interview to elicit confessions from sex offenders?Psychology, Crime & Law, 16(7), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160902971055
24.
KellyC. E.MillerJ. C.RedlichA. D.KleinmanS. M. (2013). A taxonomy of interrogation methods. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030310
25.
LeoR. A. (2008). Police interrogation and American justice. Harvard University Press.
26.
MayL.GewehrE.ZimmermannJ.RaibleY.VolbertR. (2021). How guilty and innocent suspects perceive the police and themselves: Suspect interviews in Germany. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 26(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12184
27.
MeissnerC. A.RedlichA. D.MichaelS. W.EvansJ. R.CamillettiC. R.BhattS.BrandonS. (2014). Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 459–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9207-6
28.
MeissnerC. A.Surmon-BöhrF.OleszkiewiczS.AlisonL. J. (2017). Developing an evidence-based perspective on interrogation: A review of the U.S. government’s high-value detainee interrogation group research program. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(4), 438–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000136
MillerJ. C.RedlichA. D.KellyC. E. (2018). Accusatorial and information-gathering interview and interrogation methods: A multi-country comparison. Psychology, Crime & Law, 24(9), 935–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1467909
31.
MilneB.BullR. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Wiley.
32.
RedlichA. D.YanS.NorrisR. J.BushwayS. D. (2018). The influence of confessions on guilty pleas and plea discounts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000144
33.
ScherrK. C.RedlichA. D.KassinS. M. (2020). Cumulative disadvantage: A psychological framework for understanding how innocence can lead to confession, wrongful conviction, and beyond. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 353–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619896608
34.
Shaked-SchroerN.CostanzoM.BergerD. E. (2015). Overlooking coerciveness: The impact of interrogation techniques and guilt corroboration on jurors’ judgments of coerciveness. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12011
35.
SnookB.BrooksD.BullR. (2015). A lesson on interrogations from detainees: Predicting self-reported confessions and cooperation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(12), 1243–1260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815604179
36.
VallanoJ. P.Schreiber CompoN. (2015). Rapport-building with cooperative witnesses and criminal suspects: A theoretical and empirical review. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 21(1), 85–99.
WachiT.WatanabeK.YokotaK.OtsukaY.KuraishiH.LambM. (2014). Police interviewing styles and confessions in Japan. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(7), 673–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.854791
39.
WachiT.WatanabeK.YokotaK.OtsukaY.LambM. E. (2016a). Japanese interrogation techniques from prisoners’ perspectives. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(5), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815608667
40.
WachiT.WatanabeK.YokotaK.OtsukaY.LambM. E. (2016b). Japanese suspect interviews, confessions, and related factors. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 31(3), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-015-9179-0
41.
WalshD.BullR. (2010). What really is effective in interviews with suspects? A study comparing interviewing skills against interviewing outcomes. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(2), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X463356
42.
WalshD.BullR. (2012). Examining rapport in investigative interviews with suspects: Does its building and maintenance work?Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-011-9087-x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
