Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Training probation officers on evidence-based practices (EBPs) is vital to ensuring that community supervision is maximally effective at reducing recidivism. However, after training, probation officers often have differential perceptions regarding EBPs. Thus, this study surveyed 90 adult probation officers after they participated in a training based on the Risk-Need-Responsivity model and Core Correctional Practices and examined whether their role orientation, job satisfaction, and confidence and skill proficiency using EBPs predicted their perceptions regarding the EBPs’ ease of use, usefulness, and perceived success at reducing recidivism on their caseload. Regression analyses revealed that all predictors accounted for variability in officers’ perceptions regarding the perceived success of using EBPs, explaining 41.2% of the variance, but job satisfaction (ΔR² = .18) and officer role orientation (ΔR² = .10) were most critical, solely explaining 28.5% of the variance. We conclude by providing recommendations for improving probation officers’ perceptions of EBPs.

Keywords

perceptions probation officer evidence-based practices risk-need-responsivity core correctional practices

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

(2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x

Alexander

(2011). Applying implementation research to improve community corrections: Making sure that new thing sticks. Federal Probation Journal, 75, 47–51. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/75_2_8_0.pdf

Alper

Durose

M. R.

Markman

(2018). 2018 update on prisoner recidivism: A 9-year follow-up period (2005-2014). In Durose

M. R.

(Ed.), Special report essay. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/18upr9yfup0514.pdf

Annison

Eadie

Knight

(2008). People first: Probation officer perspectives on probation work. Probation Journal, 55(3), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550508095122

Baillargeon

Binswanger

Penn

Williams

Murray

(2009). Psychiatric disorders and repeat incarcerations: The revolving prison door. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166(1), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08030416

Balzarini

T. K.

(2023). Revitalizing the lost scrolls of correctional bible: Before the risk-need-responsivity model. In Magaletta

P. R.

Ternes

Patry

(Eds.), The history and future of correctional psychology (pp. 137–163). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37480-7_8

Beijersbergen

K. A.

Dirkzwager

A. J. E.

Molleman

van der Laan

P. H.

Nieuwbeerta

(2015). Procedural justice in prison: The importance of staff characteristics. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(4), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x13512767

Belenko

Johnson

I. D.

Taxman

F. S.

Rieckmann

(2018). Probation staff attitudes towards substance abuse treatment and evidence-based practices. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(2), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x16650679

Bhattacherjee

Sanford

(2006). Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An elaboration likelihood model. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 805–825. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148755

10.

Blasko

B. L.

Viglione

Toronjo

Taxman

F. S.

(2019). Probation officer-probation agency fit: Understanding disparities in the use of motivational interviewing techniques. Corrections: Policy, Practice, and Research, 4(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2018.1544471

11.

Bonta

(2023). Training community supervision officers in the risk-need-responsivity model of offender rehabilitation: A review and implications. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 62(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2022.2158986

12.

Bonta

Andrews

D. A.

(2017). The psychology of criminal conduct. Routledge.

13.

Bonta

Bourgon

Rugge

Scott

T. L.

Yessine

A. K.

Gutierrez

(2011). An experimental demonstration of training probation officers in evidence-based community supervision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(11), 1127–1148. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0093854811420678

14.

Bourgon

Bonta

(2014). Reconsidering the responsivity principle: A way to move forward. Federal Probation, 78(2), 3–10. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/78_2_1_0.pdf

15.

Cranny

Smith

Stone

(Eds.). (1992). Job satisfaction: How people feel about their jobs and how it affects their performance. Lexington Books.

16.

Daigle-Zinn

W. J.

Andrews

D. A.

(1980). Interpersonal skill training for young adult prisoners. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 22(3), 320–327.

17.

Damschroder

L. J.

Aron

D. C.

Keith

R. E.

Kirsh

S. R.

Alexander

J. A.

Lowery

J. C.

(2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50

18.

Debus-Sherrill

Breno

Taxman

F. S.

(2023). What makes or breaks evidence-based supervision? Staff and organizational predictors of evidence-based practice in probation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 67(6–7), 662–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X211049182

19.

Dowden

Andrews

D. A.

(2004). The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of core correctional practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X03257765

20.

Durlak

J. A.

DuPre

E. P.

(2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0

21.

Fagerlin

Wang

Ubel

P. A.

(2005). Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people’s health care decisions: is a picture worth a thousand statistics? Medical Decision Making, 25(4), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X05278931

22.

Fixsen

D. L.

Blase

K. A.

Naoom

S. F.

Wallace

(2009). Core implementation components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509335549

23.

Gefen

(2004). What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: Linking trust mechanisms and ERP usefulness. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1), 263–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2004.11045792

24.

Gefen

Reychav

(2014). Why trustworthiness in an IT vendor is important even after the vendor left: IT is accepting the message and not just the messenger that is important. Omega, 44, 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.11.002

25.

Gendreau

Goggin

(2014). Practicing psychology in correctional settings. In Weiner

I. B.

Otto

R. K.

(Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 759–794). John Wiley.

26.

Getahun

Sims

Hummer

(2008). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment among probation and parole officers: A case study. Professional Issues in Criminal Justice, 3(1), 1–16. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Don-Hummer/publication/242162174_Job_Satisfaction_and_Organizational_Commitment_Among_Probation_and_Parole_Officers_A_Case_Study/links/56de2ef308aedf2bf0c874dd/Job-Satisfaction-and-Organizational-Commitment-Among-Probation-and-Parole-Officers-A-Case-Study.pdf

27.

Gunnison

Helfgott

J. B.

(2019). Offender reentry: Beyond crime and punishment. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

28.

Guy

L. S.

Nelson

R. J.

Fusco-Morin

S. L.

Vincent

G. M.

(2014). What do juvenile probation officers think of using the SAVRY and YLS/CMI for case management, and do they use the instruments properly? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(3), 227–241. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/14999013.2014.939789

29.

Hyland

S. S.

(2019). Justice expenditure and employment extracts, 2016-preliminary 9NCJ254126. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=6728

30.

Ingel

S. N.

Davis

L. R.

Rudes

D. S.

Hartwell

T. N.

Drazdowski

T. K.

McCart

M. R.

Chapman

J. E.

Taxman

F. S.

Sheidow

A. J.

(2022). Misunderstanding and sensemaking among juvenile probation officers working with evidence-based practices. Vic Offender. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F15564886.2021.1985670

31.

Joplin

Bogue

Campbell

Carey

Clawson

Faust

Florio

Wasson

Woodward

(2004). Using an integrated model to implement evidence-based practices in corrections. International Community Corrections Association; American Correctional Association. http://www.crj.org/assets/2017/07/51_NICCJI_Project_ICCA_2.pdf

32.

Klockars

C. B.

(1972). A theory of probation supervision. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 63(4), 550–557. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1141809.pdf

33.

Krupa

J. M.

(2021). Examining the personal and perceived organizational characteristics associated with juvenile probation staff job satisfaction. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(3), 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820977581

34.

Labrecque

R. M.

Smith

(2017). Does training and coaching matter? An 18-month evaluation of a community supervision model. Victims & Offenders, 12(2), 233–252. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/15564886.2015.1013234

35.

Lambert

E. G.

Hogan

N. L.

Griffin

(2007). The impact of distributive and procedural justice on correctional staff job stress, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 644–656. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.09.001

36.

Lambert

E. G.

Hogan

N. L.

Tucker

K. A.

(2009). Problems at work: Exploring the correlates of role stress among correctional staff. The Prison Journal, 89(4), 460–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885509351006

37.

Latessa

E. J.

(2006). The challenge of change: Correctional programs and evidence-based practices. Criminology & Public Policy, 3(4), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2004.tb00061.x

38.

Lee

Joo

Johnson

W. W.

(2009). The effect of participatory management on internal stress, overall job satisfaction and turnover rate among federal probation officers. Federal Probation Journal, 73(1), 28–32. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/73_1_6_0.pdf

39.

C. Y.

(2013). Persuasive messages on information system acceptance: A theoretical extension of elaboration likelihood model and social influence theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.003

40.

Maruna

McNeill

Farrall

Lightowler

(2012). Desistance research and probation practice: Knowledge exchange and co-producing evidence-based practice models. Irish Probation Journal, 9, 42–52. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301307916.pdf#page=43

41.

Mathews

B. W.

(2015). Corrections, implementation, and organizational ecology: An introduction to the purveyor core-skills model. Criminal Justice Studies, 28, 464–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2015.1080698

42.

Matz

A. K.

Woo

Kim

(2014). A meta-analysis of the correlates of turnover intent in criminal justice organizations: Does agency type matter? Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.02.004

43.

Miller

Maloney

(2013). Practitioner compliance with risk/needs assessment tools a theoretical and empirical assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(7), 716–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812468883

44.

Minor

K. I.

Wells

J. B.

Lambert

E. G.

Keller

(2014). Increasing morale: Personal and work environment antecedents of job morale among staff in juvenile corrections. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(11), 1308–1326. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0093854814544702

45.

Paparozzi

M. A.

Gendreau

(2005). An intensive supervision program that worked: Service delivery, professional orientation, and organizational supportiveness. The Prison Journal, 85(4), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885505281529

46.

Rhineberger-Dunn

Mack

K. Y.

(2020). The impact of individual factors, job characteristics, and organizational variables on job stress and job satisfaction among community corrections staff. Criminal Justice Review, 45(4), 464–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016820927077

47.

Ricks

Eno Louden

(2015). The relationship between officer orientation and supervision strategies in community corrections. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000098

48.

Ricks

E. P.

Eno Louden

Kennealy

P. J.

(2016). Probation officer role emphases and use of risk assessment information before and after training. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 34(2–3), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2219

49.

Robinson

C. R.

Lowenkamp

C. T.

Holsinger

A. M.

VanBenschoten

Alexander

Oleson

J. C.

(2012). A random study of Staff Training Aimed at Reducing Re-arrest (STARR): Using core correctional practices in probation interactions. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.674823

50.

Schlager

M. D.

(2010). An assessment of parole officer and administrator attitudes on organizational culture and parole supervision in a Northeastern state. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47, 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670802134101

51.

Shook

J. J.

Sarri

R. C.

(2007). Structured decision making in juvenile justice: Judges’ and probation officers’ perceptions and use. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(10), 1335–1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.05.008

52.

Simmons

Cochran

J. K.

Blount

W. R.

(1997). The effects of job-related stress and job satisfaction on probation officers’ inclinations to quit. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 21(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887450

53.

Skeem

J. L.

Manchak

(2008). Back to the future: From Klockars’ model of effective supervision to evidence-based practice in probation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47(3), 220–247. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/10509670802134069

54.

Smith

Schweitzer

Labrecque

R. M.

Latessa

E. J.

(2012). Improving probation officers’ supervision skills: An evaluation of the EPICS model. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.674826

55.

Steiner

Wooldredge

(2017). Individual and environmental influences on prison officer safety. Justice Quarterly, 34(2), 324–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2016.1164883

56.

Tavakol

Dennick

(2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116%2Fijme.4dfb.8dfd

57.

Taxman

F. S.

Gordon

J. A.

(2009). Do fairness and equity matter? An examination of organizational justice among correctional officers in adult prisons. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(7), 695–711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809335039

58.

Venkatesh

Brown

S. A.

(2001). A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 71–102. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250959

59.

Venkatesh

Davis

F. D.

(1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Science, 27(3), 451–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x

60.

Verquer

M. L.

Beehr

T. A.

Wagner

S. H.

(2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person-organization fit and work attitudes. Vocational Behavior, 63, 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00036-2

61.

Viglione

(2019). The Risk-Need-Responsivity Model: How do probation officers implement the principles of effective intervention? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(5), 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818807505

62.

Viglione

Blasko

B. L.

(2018). The differential impacts of probation staff attitudes on use of evidence-based practices. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(4), 449–458. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/law0000180

63.

Viglione

Rudes

D. S.

Taxman

F. S.

(2015). Misalignment in supervision implementing risk/needs assessment instruments in probation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814548447

64.

Viglione

J. E.

(2015). Bridging the research/practice gap: Street-level decision-making and historical influences related to use of evidence-based practices in adult probation [Doctoral dissertation]. George Mason University.

65.

Vincent

G. M.

Paiva-Salisbury

M. L.

Cook

N. E.

Guy

L. S.

Perrault

R. T.

(2012). Impact of risk/needs assessment on juvenile probation officers’ decision making: Importance of implementation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18(4), 549–576. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0027186

66.

Waters

Moreno

Colgan

R. B.

(2013). Capitalizing on collaboration in Arizona: Working together to advance the use of evidence-based officer skills at all levels of community corrections. Federal Probation, 77, 59–63. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/77_2_10_0.pdf

67.

Welsh

W. N.

Lin

H. J.

Peters

R. H.

Stahler

G. J.

Lehman

W. E.

Stein

L. A.

Monico

Eggers

Abdel-Salam

Pierce

J. C.

Hunt

Gallagher

Frisman

L. K.

(2015). Effects of a strategy to improve offender assessment practices: Staff perceptions of implementation outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 152, 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.03.033

68.

Wilson

Applegate

B. K.

Bolin

R. M.

(2022). Evidence-based practices in community corrections: Officers’ perceptions of professional relevance and personal competence. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09581-x

What Factors Contribute to Differential Perceptions Toward Evidence-Based Practices? An Examination of Officer Role Orientation,Job Satisfaction,Confidence,and Skill Proficiency

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References