This study evaluated the incremental validity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) and the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO PI-3) scores in predicting California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training dimension (i.e., the POST-10) ratings in public safety (n = 754) pre-employment psychological evaluations (PPEs). Although research has supported the use of the MMPI and NEO PI instruments separately, no study has evaluated the use of these abnormal- and normal-range tests in conjunction, consistent with the POST Manual requirement of use of clinical and normal-range personality measures. The MMPI-3 and NEO PI-3 were completed during PPE. Problem ratings in the POST-10 dimensions were rated using information from the assessing psychologist’s report. MMPI-3 and NEO PI-3 scores incremented one another in nearly every hierarchical ordinal logit regression model conducted to predict the ratings for five dimensions. Clinical implications and limitations, including potential criterion contamination especially for NEO PI-3 scores, are discussed.
Ben-PorathY. S.TellegenA. (2020a). MMPI-3: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.
2.
Ben-PorathY. S.TellegenA. (2020b). MMPI-3: Technical manual. University of Minnesota Press.
3.
ButcherJ. N.DahlstromW. G.GrahamJ. R.TellegenA.KaemmerB. (1989). MMPI-2: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for administration and scoring. University of Minnesota Press.
4.
ChibnallJ. T.DetrickP. (2003). The NEO PI-R, Inwald Personality Inventory, and MMPI-2 in the prediction of police academy performance: A case for incremental validity. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02885696
5.
CoreyD. M.McElroyH. K.Ben-PorathY. S. (2022). Statewide psychological screening mandates for police candidates in the United States: A review and comparison to the standard of practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 54(2), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000487
6.
CoreyD. M.SellbomM.Ben-PorathY. S. (2018). Risks associated with overcontrolled behavior in police officer recruits. Psychological Assessment, 30(12), 1691–1702. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000607
7.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5–13.
8.
DetrickP.Ben-PorathY. S.SellbomM. (2016). Associations between MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) and Inwald Personality Inventory (IPI) scale scores in a law enforcement preemployment screening sample. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 31(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-015-9172-7
9.
DetrickP.ChibnallJ. T. (2006). NEO PI-R personality characteristics of high-performing entry-level police officers. Psychological Sciences, 3(4), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/1541-1559.3.4.274
10.
DetrickP.ChibnallJ. T. (2020). Frame-of-reference effects on police officer applicant responses to the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 35(3), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-9313-5
11.
DetrickP.ChibnallJ. T.CallC. (2010). Demand effects on positive response distortion by police officer applicants on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(5), 410–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.497401
12.
DetrickP.ChibnallJ. T.LuebbertM. C. (2004). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory as predictor of police academy performance. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31(6), 676–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854804268751
13.
GoodisonS. E. (2022). Local police departments personnel, 2020. Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
14.
GoughH. G.BradleyP. (2002). California Psychological Inventory manual. Consulting Psychologists Press.
15.
HallJ. T.MentonW. H.Ben-PorathY. S. (2022). Examining the psychometric equivalency of MMPI-3 scale scores derived from the MMPI-3 and the MMPI-2-RF-EX. Assessment, 29(4), 842–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191121991921
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 33(2), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529786
18.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (2013). Introduction to the empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In WidigerT. A.CostaP. T.Jr. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (pp. 15–27). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13939-002
19.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.MartinT. A. (2005). The NEO-PI-3: A more readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(3), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05
20.
MentonW. H.CoreyD. M.Ben-PorathY. S. (2022). Evidence for the comparability of local and remote administrations of the MMPI-2-RF in police candidate evaluations. Psychological Assessment, 34(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001088
21.
RobertsM. D.RobertsR.JohnsonM. (2018). CPI-434 police and public safety selection report: Technical manual (2nd ed.). JRA.
22.
RobertsR. M.TarescavageA. M.Ben-PorathY. S.RobertsM. D. (2019). Predicting postprobationary job performance of police officers using CPI and MMPI-2-RF test data obtained during preemployment psychological screening. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(5), 544–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1423990
23.
SellbomM.CoreyD. M.Ben-PorathY. S. (2022). Incremental validity of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire in the preemployment assessment of police officer candidates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(7), 1050–1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211033630
24.
SellbomM.FischlerG. L.Ben-PorathY. S. (2007). Identifying MMPI-2 predictors of police officer integrity and misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(8), 985–1004. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854807301224
TalericoG. M.McCallumJ. J.WhitmanM. R.TarescavageA. M.CoreyD. M.Ben-PorathY. S. (2023). Comparing the validity of MMPI-3 scores in prehire psychological screenings of male and female police officer candidates. Journal of Personality Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2023.2191278
27.
TarescavageA. M.BrewsterJ.CoreyD. M.Ben-PorathY. S. (2015). Use of prehire Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2—Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) police candidate scores to predict supervisor ratings of posthire performance. Assessment, 22(4), 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114548445
28.
TarescavageA. M.CoreyD. M.Ben-PorathY. S. (2015). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) predictors of police officer problem behavior. Assessment, 22(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114534885
29.
TarescavageA. M.CoreyD. M.GuptonH. M.Ben-PorathY. S. (2015). Criterion validity and practical utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in assessments of police officer candidates. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97(4), 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2014.995800
30.
TarescavageA. M.FischlerG. L.CappoB. M.HillD. O.CoreyD. M.Ben-PorathY. S. (2015). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) predictors of police officer problem behavior and collateral self-report test scores. Psychological Assessment, 27(1), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000041
31.
TellegenA.Ben-PorathY. S. (2011). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2—Restructured form (MMPI-2-RF): Technical manual. University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 2008)
32.
TellegenA.SellbomM.KampJ.HandelR. W. (2023). Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.
WhitmanM. R.CoreyD. M.Ben-PorathY. S. (2023a). Associations between MMPI-3 and psychosocial history findings obtained in preemployment evaluations of public safety candidates. Assessment, 30(7), 2128–2145. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221138931
35.
WhitmanM. R.CoreyD. M.Ben-PorathY. S. (2023b). Does prior law enforcement experience affect scores on preemployment psychological testing? An investigation using the MMPI-3. Psychological Services, 20, 889–898. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000679
36.
WhitmanM. R.EliasL. S.CappoB. M.Ben-PorathY. S. (2021). Criterion validity of MMPI-3 scores in preemployment evaluations of public safety candidates. Psychological Assessment, 33(12), 1169–1180. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001042
37.
WongpakaranN.WongpakaranT.WeddingD.GwetK. L. (2013). A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: A study conducted with personality disorder samples. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, Article 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-61
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
