Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Most studies of crime reporting examine decisions to report to the police in community settings. While informative, this focus leaves a gap in identifying the correlates of official reporting behaviors among incarcerated individuals. This is noteworthy considering the passage of the Prison Rape Elimination Act mandating states collect and report data on sexual assaults in confinement facilities. To address these concerns, this study provides one of the first multivariable examinations of decisions to officially report sexual assaults to correctional staff. This study also examines the correlates of official reporting across perpetrator type (another incarcerated individual or correctional staff member) and the correlates for not reporting a sexual assault (embarrassment, fear of reprisal, and belief no investigation will take place). The findings indicate most sexual assaults are not reported, and few in-prison experiences or incident characteristics explain the decision to officially report or the reasons for not reporting.

Keywords

sexual assault corrections incarceration sexual abuse prison misconduct

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beck

A. J.

Berzofsky

Caspar

Krebs

(2013). Sexual victimization in prisons and jails reported by inmates, 2011-2012. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Beck

A. J.

Harrison

P. M.

Berzofsky

Caspar

Krebs

(2010). Sexual victimization in prisons and jails reported by inmates, 2008-2009. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2004). Data collections for the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003. U.S. Department of Justice.

Butler

H. D.

(2019). An examination of inmate adjustment stratified by time served in prison. Journal of Criminal Justice, 64, 74–88.

Carroll

(1974). Hacks, blacks, and cons: Race relations in a maximum security prison. Lexington Books.

Chen

Ullman

S. E.

(2010). Women’s reporting of sexual and physical assaults to police in the National Violence against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 16(3), 262–279.

Farkas

M. A.

Rand

K. R. L.

(1996). Female correctional officers and prisoner privacy. Marquette Law Review, 80, 995–1030.

Felson

R. B.

Messner

S. F.

Hoskin

A. W.

Deane

(2002). Reasons for reporting and not reporting domestic violence to the police. Criminology, 40(3), 617–648.

Felson

R. B.

Paré

P. P.

(2005). The reporting of domestic violence and sexual assault by nonstrangers to the police. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 67, 597–610.

10.

Fisher

Daigle

L. E.

Cullen

F. T.

Turner

M. G.

(2003). Reporting sexual victimization to the police and others: Results from a national-level study of college women. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 30, 6–38.

11.

Fowler

S. K.

Blackburn

A. G.

Marquart

J. W.

Mullings

J. L.

(2010). Would they officially report an in-prison sexual assault? An examination of inmate perceptions. The Prison Journal, 90(2), 220–243.

12.

Gaes

G. G.

Goldberg

A. L.

(2004). Prison rape: A critical review of the literature. National Institute of Justice.

13.

Garland

Wilson

(2012). Prison inmates’ views of whether reporting rape is the same as snitching: An exploratory study and research agenda. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(6), 1201–1222.

14.

Irwin

(1980). Prisons in turmoil. Little, Brown, and Company.

15.

Jacobs

J. B.

(1977). Stateville: The penitentiary in mass society. University of Chicago Press.

16.

James

D. J.

Glaze

L. E.

(2006). Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

17.

Jenness

Calavita

(2018). “It depends on the outcome”: Prisoners, grievances, and perceptions of justice. Law & Society Review, 52, 41–72.

18.

Jewkes

(2005). Men behind bars: “Doing” masculinity as an adaptation to imprisonment. Men and Masculinities, 8, 44–63.

19.

Kubiak

S. P.

Brenner

Bybee

Campbell

Fedock

(2018). Reporting sexual victimization during incarceration: Using ecological theory as a framework to inform and guide future research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19, 94–106.

20.

Liebling

Arnold

(2012). Social relationships between prisoners in a maximum security prison: Violence, faith, and the declining nature of trust. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 413–424.

21.

Liebling

Price

Elliott

(1999). Appreciative inquiry and relationships in prison. Punishment & Society, 1, 71–98.

22.

Listwan

S. L.

Colvin

Hanley

Flannery

(2010). Victimization, social support, and psychological well-being: A study of recently released prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(10), 1140–1159.

23.

Meyers

T. J.

Wright

K. A.

Young

J. T. N.

Tasca

(2017). Social support from outside the walls: Examining the role of relationship dynamics among inmates and visitors. Journal of Criminal Justice, 52, 57–67.

24.

Miller

K. L.

(2010). The darkest figure of crime: Perceptions of reasons for male inmates to not report sexual assault. Justice Quarterly, 27(5), 692–712.

25.

Morris

R. G.

Worrall

J. L.

(2014). Prison architecture and inmate misconduct: A multilevel assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 60(7), 1083–1109.

26.

Nacci

Kane

(1983). The incidence of sex and sexual aggression in federal prison. Federal Probation, 47, 31–37.

27.

Novisky

M. A.

Narvey

C. S.

Piquero

A. R.

(2022). The keepers: Returning citizens’ experiences with prison staff misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(7), 1010–1030.

28.

Persson

Dhingra

(2020). Attributions of blame in stranger and acquaintance rape: A multilevel meta-analysis and systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(3), 795–809.

29.

Prison Rape Elimination Act. (2003). 42 U.S.C. §§ 15602-15609.

30.

Reiter

K. A.

(2012). Parole, snitch, or die: California’s supermax prisons and prisoners, 1997-2007. Punishment & Society, 14(5), 530–563.

31.

Steiner

Meade

(2016). Assessing the link between exposure to a violent prison context and inmate maladjustment. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32(4), 328–356.

32.

Steiner

Wooldredge

(2008). Inmate versus environmental effects on prison rule violations. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(4), 438–456.

33.

Struckman-Johnson

(2000). Sexual coercion rates in seven Midwestern prison facilities for men. The Prison Journal, 4, 379–390.

34.

Thompson

R. A.

Nored

L. S.

Dial

K. C.

(2008). The Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA): An evaluation of policy compliance with illustrative excerpts. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19(4), 414–437.

35.

Walfield

S. M.

(2018). “Men cannot be raped”: Correlates of male rape myth acceptance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36, 6391–6417.

36.

Wolff

Shi

(2009). Type, source, and patterns of physical victimization: A comparison of male and female inmates. The Prison Journal, 89(2), 172–191.

37.

Wolff

Shi

Blitz

C. L.

Siegel

(2007). Understanding sexual victimization inside prisons: Factors that predict risk. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(3), 535–564.

38.

Wooldredge

Steiner

(2014). A bi-level framework for understanding prisoner victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 141–162.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

Understanding the Decision to Officially Report Sexual Assaults in Prison

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material