It is unknown whether existing intimate partner violence (IPV) risk assessment tools can predict recidivism within threat assessment samples. We examined the predictive validity for IPV, any violent, and general recidivism of four commonly used IPV risk appraisal tools (Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment [ODARA], Spousal Assault Risk Assessment version 2 [SARA-V2], SARA version 3 [SARA-V3], and Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk [B-SAFER]) with 247 men charged with IPV and referred to a threat assessment service. Total scores of the ODARA and SARA-V2—but not SARA-V3 or B-SAFER—significantly predicted IPV recidivism and any violent recidivism. The SARA-V2 Criminal History subscale and the B-SAFER subscale of “Past” events—but no other subscales of the SARA-V2, B-SAFER, or SARA-V3—significantly predicted IPV recidivism. Although effect sizes were smaller than in past research, our results support the use of the ODARA and SARA-V2 with threat assessment IPV populations.
AndrewsD. A.ZingerI.HogeR. D.BontaJ.GendreauP.CullenF. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28(3), 369–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01330.x
2.
BarbareeH. E.LangtonC. M.PeacockE. J. (2006). The factor structure of static actuarial items: Its relation to prediction. Sexual Abuse, 18(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320601800207
3.
BelfrageH.StrandS. (2012). Measuring the outcome of structured spousal violence risk assessments using the B-SAFER: Risk in relation to recidivism and intervention. Behavioral Science and the Law, 30(4), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2019
4.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.
CookA. N.MurrayA. A.AmatG.HartS. D. (2014). Using structured professional judgment guidelines in threat assessment and management: Presentation, analysis, and formulation of a case of serial intimate partner violence. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 1(2), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000011
8.
EkeA. W.MeloyJ. R.BrooksK.JeanL.HiltonN. Z. (2014). Threats, approach behavior, and violent recidivism among offenders who harass Canadian justice officials. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 1(3), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000016
9.
EnnisL.HargreavesT.GulayetsM. (2015). The integrated threat and risk assessment centre: A program evaluation investigating the implementation of threat management recommendations. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 2(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000040
10.
FeinR. A.VossekuilB. (1999). Assassination in the United States: An operational study of recent assassins, attackers, and near-lethal approachers. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 50, 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs14457j
11.
GerbrandijJ.RosenfeldB.Nijdam-JonesA.GaliettaM. (2018). Evaluating risk assessment instruments for intimate partner stalking and intimate partner violence. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 5(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000101
12.
GrahamL. M.SahayK. M.RizoC. F.MessingJ. T.MacyR. J. (2021). The validity and reliability of available intimate partner homicide and reassault risk assessment tools: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 22(1), 18–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018821952
13.
GuyL. S.KusajC.PackerI. K.DouglasK. S. (2015). Influence of the HCR-20, LS/CMI, and PCL-R on decisions about parole suitability among lifers. Law and Human Behavior, 39(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000111
14.
HansonR. K. (2022). Prediction statistics for psychological assessment. American Psychological Association.
15.
HareR. D. (2003). Hare psychopathy checklist–revised (PCL-R; 2nd ed.). Pearson.
16.
HegelJ.PelletierK. D.OlverM. E. (2022). Predictive properties of the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA) in a Northern Canadian Prairie sample. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(3), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211033631
17.
HelmusL. M.BabchishinK. M. (2017). Primer on risk assessment and the statistics used to evaluate its accuracy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816678898
18.
HelmusL. M.BourgonG. (2011). Taking stock of 15 years of research on the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA): A critical review. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2010.551709
19.
HiltonN. Z. (2021). Domestic violence risk assessment: Tools for effective prediction and management (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.
20.
HiltonN. Z.EkeA. W. (2016). Nonspecialization of criminal careers among intimate partner violence offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(10), 1347–1363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816637886
21.
HiltonN. Z.EnnisL. (2020). Intimate partner violence risk assessment and management: An RNR approach to threat assessment. In WormithJ. S.CraigL. A.HogueT. E. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of what works in violence risk management: Theory, research and practice (pp. 163–182). Wiley.
22.
HiltonN. Z.HamE. (2015). Cost-effectiveness of electronic training in domestic violence risk assessment: ODARA 101. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(6), 1065–1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514539762
23.
HiltonN. Z.HarrisG. T. (2009). How nonrecidivism affects predictive accuracy: Evidence from a cross-validation of the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(2), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508316478
24.
HiltonN. Z.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.HoughtonR. E.EkeA. W. (2008). An indepth actuarial assessment for wife assault recidivism: The Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide. Law and Human Behavior, 32(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9088-6
25.
HiltonN. Z.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.LangC.CormierC. A.LinesK. J. (2004). A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: The Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment. Psychological Assessment, 16, 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.16.3.267
26.
HiltonN. Z.PhamA. T.JungS.NunesK.EnnisL. (2021). Risk scores and reliability of the SARA, SARA-V3, B-SAFER, and ODARA among intimate partner violence (IPV) cases referred for threat assessment. Police Practice and Research, 22(1), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2020.1798235
27.
JungS.BuroK. (2017). Appraising risk for intimate partner violence in a police context. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(2), 240–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816667974
28.
JungS.HimmenM. (2022). A field study of the police use of the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA). Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 9(4), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000175
29.
KennealyP. J.SkeemJ. L.WaltersG. D.CampJ. (2010). Do core interpersonal and affective traits of PCL-R psychopathy interact with antisocial behavior and disinhibition to predict violence?Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 569–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019618
30.
KleinA. R. (2009). Practical implications of current domestic violence research: For law enforcement, prosecutors and judges. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice Special Report. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/225722.pdf
31.
KroppP. R.HartS. D. (2015). SARA-V3: User manual for version 3 of the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide. Proactive Resolutions.
32.
KroppP. R.HartS. D.BelfrageH. (2010). Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk (B-SAFER), Version 2: User manual. Proactive Resolutions.
33.
KroppP. R.HartS. D.WebsterC. W.EavesD. (1995). Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (2nd ed). British Columbia Institute on Family Violence.
34.
LloydC. D.HansonR. K.RichardsD. K.SerinR. C. (2020). Reassessment improves prediction of criminal recidivism: A prospective study of 3,421 individuals in New Zealand. Psychological Assessment, 32(6), 568–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000813
35.
LoinazI. (2014). Typologies, risk and recidivism in partner-violent men with the B-SAFER: A pilot. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.770854
36.
MeloyJ. R.HoffmannJ. (2021). International handbook of threat assessment (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
37.
MessingJ. T.ThallerJ. (2013). The average predictive validity of intimate partner violence risk assessment instruments. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(7), 1537–1558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512468250
38.
NoordzijM.LeffondreK.van StralenK. J.ZoccaliC.DekkerF. W.JagerK. J. (2013). When do we need competing risks methods for survival analysis in nephrology?Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 28(11), 2670–2677. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft355
39.
NunesK. L.PrescottD. S.EnnisL.KeprosL. R. (2022). Different perspectives on (un)certainty: Challenges, standards, and strategies. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 28(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2021.1896809
40.
RadatzD. L.HiltonN. Z. (2022). The Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment: Predicting violence among men with a police record of intimate partner violence in the United States. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(3), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211035816
41.
RadatzD. L.WrightE. M. (2016). Integrating the principles of effective intervention into batterer intervention programming: The case for moving toward more evidence-based programming. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014566695
42.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
43.
RobinX.TurckN.HainardA.TibertiN.LisacekF.SanchezJ.-C.MullerM. (2011). pROC: An open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, Article 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-77
44.
SalekinR. T.RogersR.SewellK. W. (1996). A review and meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist and Psychopathy Checklist—Revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3(3), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.1996.tb00071.x
45.
SaxtonM. D.JaffeP. G.StraatmanA-.L.OlszowyL.DawsonM. (2020). Measuring intimate partner violence risk: A national survey of Canadian police offenders. Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being, 5(3), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.35502/jcswb.144
46.
SchafersC.OlverM. E.WormithJ. S. (2021). Dynamic appraisal of intimate partner violence risk and need: Results from an outpatient treatment program. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(4), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820980498
47.
SimonsA.MeloyJ. R. (2017). Foundations of threat assessment and management. In Van HasseltV. B.BourkeM. L. (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral criminology (pp. 627–644). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61625-4_36
48.
StoreyJ. E.KroppP. R.HartS. D.BelfrageH.StrandS. (2014). Assessment and management of risk for intimate partner violence by police officers using the Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(2), 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813503960
49.
StrandS. J. M.SeleniusH.PeterssonJ.StoreyJ. E. (2021). Repeated and systematic intimate partner violence in rural areas in Sweden. International Criminology, 1, 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43576-021-00026-x
50.
SvalinK.LevanderS. (2019). The predictive validity of intimate partner violence risk assessments conducted by practitioners in different settings: A review of the literature. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 35(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09343-4
51.
SvalinK.MellgrenC.LevanderM. T.LevanderS. (2018). Police employees’ violence risk assessments: The predictive validity of the B-SAFER and the significance of protective actions. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 56, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.09.001
52.
TraversÁ.McDonaghT.CunninghamT.ArmourC.HansenM. (2021). The effectiveness of interventions to prevent recidivism in perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 84, Article 101974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101974
53.
van der PutC. E.GubbelsJ.AssinkM. (2019). Predicting domestic violence: A meta-analysis on the predictive validity of risk assessment tools. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 47, 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.03.008
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
