Culture,Strengths,and Risk: The Language of Pre-Sentence Reports in Indigenous Sentencing Courts and Mainstream Courts

Abstract

Pre-sentence reports (PSRs) provide important information about an individual’s background and circumstances to assist judicial officers in the sentencing process. The present study analyzed PSRs for 63 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people sentenced by either an Indigenous sentencing court or a mainstream court in the Australian State of Victoria. Using natural language processing techniques, our analyses revealed few differences between PSRs conducted for each court. However, PSRs were found to predominantly feature key words that are risk-based, with mainstream court PSRs more negatively worded than the Indigenous sentencing court’s PSRs. This may have been due to the inclusion of results from a risk and need assessment tool. Pro-social factors did comprise more than one third of extracted keywords, although the number of strength-based culture-related keywords, in particular, was low across PSRs in both courts. It is possible that courts may not be receiving all the information needed to promote individualized justice.

Keywords

pre-sentence reports Indigenous sentencing courts Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander natural language processing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(1998). Level of Service Inventory—Revised: Screening version. Multi-Health Systems.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Routledge.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

Wormith

J. S.

(2008). The Level of Service/Risk, Need, Responsivity (LS/RNR): User’s manual. Multi-Health Systems.

Anthony

(2010). Sentencing Indigenous offenders (Brief 7, Indigenous Justice Clearinghouse). Department of Justice and Attorney General, Government of New South Wales. https://www.indigenousjustice.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/mp/files/publications/files/brief007.v1.pdf

Anthony

Bartels

Hopkins

(2015). Lessons lost in sentencing: Welding individualised justice to Indigenous justice. Melbourne University Law Review, 39(1), 47–76.

Anthony

Longman

(2017). Blinded by the White: A comparative analysis of jury challenges on racial grounds. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 6(3), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v6i3.419

Anthony

Marchetti

Behrendt

Longman

(2017). Individualised justice through indigenous community reports in sentencing. Journal of Judicial Administration, 26(3), 121–140.

April

Magrinelli Orsi

(2013). Gladue practices in the provinces and territories. Department of Justice Canada. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/ccs-ajc/rr12_11/rr12_11.pdf

Australian Law Reform Commission. (2017). Pathways to justice—An inquiry into the incarceration rate of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/pathways-to-justice-inquiry-into-the-incarceration-rate-of-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-peoples-alrc-report-133/

10.

Behdenna

Barigou

Belalem

(2018). Document level sentiment analysis: A survey. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Context-Aware Systems and Applications, 18(13), e2. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.14-3-2018.154339

11.

Blondel

V. D.

Guillaume

J.-L.

Lambiotte

Lefebvre

(2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008

12.

Borowski

(2010). Indigenous participation in sentencing young offenders: Findings from an evaluation of the Children’s Koori Court of Victoria. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43(3), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.43.3.465

13.

Borowski

(2011). In courtroom 7—The Children’s Koori Court at work: Findings from an evaluation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(7), 1110–1134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X10381622

14.

Borum

Bartel

Forth

(2006). Manual for the Structured Assessment for Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). Psychological Assessment Resources.

15.

Bouma

(2009). Normalized (pointwise) mutual information in collocation extraction. In Proceedings of GSCL (pp. 31–40). https://svn.spraakdata.gu.se/repos/gerlof/pub/www/Docs/npmi-pfd.pdf

16.

Bugmy v. The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571.

17.

Clarke

Hepburn

Herter

(2018). Gladue report guide: How to prepare and write a Gladue report. Legal Services Society. https://pubsdb.lss.bc.ca/pdfs/pubs/Gladue-Report-Guide-eng.pdf

18.

Council of Yukon First Nations. (2015). Yukon Gladue—Research & resource identification project. http://www.lawsocietyyukon.com/pdf/YukonGladueReport2015.pdf

19.

County Court Act 1958 (Vic.) (Austl.).

20.

Crimes (Sentencing) Act , 2005 (ACT) (Austl.).

21.

Criminal Code , RSC 1985. c. C-46.

22.

Cunneen

(2018). Sentencing, punishment and indigenous people in Australia. Journal of Global Indigeneity, 3(1), 1–24.

23.

Cunneen

(2020). Youth justice and racialization: Comparative reflections. Theoretical Criminology, 24(3), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480619889039

24.

Dawkins

Brookes

Middlin

Crossley

(2011). County Koori Court: Final evaluation report. County Court of Victoria and the Victorian Department of Justice. https://www.countycourt.vic.gov.au/files/documents/2018-08/ckc-evaluation-reportfinal27sep110.pdf

25.

Deadly Connections. (2021). Bugmy justice project. https://deadlyconnections.org.au/bugmy-justice-project/

26.

Department of Justice and Community Safety. (2020). Annual report: 2019-2020. https://www.justice.vic.gov.au/annual-reports/annual-report-2019-20

27.

de Vogel

de Ruiter

Bouman

de Vries Robbé

. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (2nd ed.). Van der Hoeven Kliniek.

28.

Dudgeon

Milroy

Walker

(2014). Working together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander mental health and wellbeing principles and practice (2nd ed.). Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.telethonkids.org.au/globalassets/media/documents/aboriginal-health/working-together-second-edition/working-together-aboriginal-and-wellbeing-2014.pdf

29.

Edwige

Gray

(2021). Significance of culture to wellbeing, healing and rehabilitation. Bugmy Bar Book. https://www.publicdefenders.nsw.gov.au/Documents/significance-of-culture-2021.pdf

30.

Elbagir

Yang

(2018). Sentiment analysis of Twitter data based on ordinal classification. In Proceedings of 2018 international conference on algorithms, computing and artificial intelligence (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1145/3302425.3302488

31.

Feeley

M. M.

Simon

(1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30(4), 449–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.x

32.

Fitzgerald

(2008). Does circle sentencing reduce Aboriginal offending? (Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice, No. 115). NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research. https://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Publications/CJB/cjb115.pdf

33.

Harcourt

B. E.

(2006). Against Prediction: Profiling, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226315997

34.

Hannah-Moffat

(2013). Actuarial sentencing: An “unsettled” proposition. Justice Quarterly, 30(2), 270–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.682603

35.

Hannah-Moffat

Maurutto

(2010). Re-contextualizing pre-sentence reports: Risk and race. Punishment & Society, 12(3), 262–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474510369442

36.

“HAS” v. The State of Western Australia [2005] WASCA 29.

37.

Herbert

(2017). Change in paradigm or change in paradox: Gladue report practices and access to justice. Queen’s Law Journal, 43(1), 149–174.

38.

Hutto

C. J.

Gilbert

(2014). Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In Proceedings of the eighth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media (pp. 216–225). https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/viewPaper/8109

39.

Jurek

Mulvenna

M. D.

(2015). Improved lexicon-based sentiment analysis for social media analytics. Security Informatics, 4(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13388-015-0024-x

40.

MacLennan

Shields

(2013). Evaluation of Gladue report pilot project. Legal Services Society. https://legalaid.bc.ca/sites/default/files/2019-03/gladueReportDisbursementEvaluationJune2013.pdf

41.

Marchetti

(2017). Nothing works? A meta-review of Indigenous sentencing court evaluations. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 28(3), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2017.12036074

42.

Maxwell

Day

Casey

(2013). Understanding the needs of vulnerable prisoners: The role of social and emotional wellbeing. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 9(2), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/17449201311326934

43.

Morgan

Louis

(2010). Evaluation of the Queensland Murri Court: Final report (AIC Reports: Technical and Background Paper, No. 39). Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-02/tbp039.pdf

44.

Pang

Lee

(2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1–2), 1–135. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000011

45.

Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld.) (Austl.).

46.

R v. Gladue . (1999). 1 SCR 688.

47.

Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic.) (Austl.).

48.

Sentencing Act 1995 (NT) (Austl.).

49.

Sentencing Act 2002 (NZ).

50.

Serin

R. C.

(2007). The Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-Entry (DRAOR) [Unpublished user manual]. Carleton University.

51.

Shepherd

S. M.

Anthony

(2018). Popping the cultural bubble of violence risk assessment tools. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 29(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2017.1354055

52.

Starr

S. B.

(2015). The new profiling: Why punishing based on poverty and identity is unconstitutional and wrong. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 27(4), 229–236.

53.

Victorian Aboriginal Legal Service. (2021). Aboriginal community justice reports. http://www.vals.org.au/aboriginal-community-justice-reports/

54.

Webster

C. D.

Martin

Brink

Nicholls

T. L.

Middleton

(2004). Manual for the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START): Version 1.0. Consultation edition. St. Joseph’s Healthcare and Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB