Risk,Needs,and Behavior: Moderating the Mediated Relationship Between Criminal Thinking,Institutional Infractions,and Recidivism With Time Spent in Prison

Abstract

The research question addressed in the current study asked whether a risk factor would moderate the relationship between a needs factor and behavior and in so doing increase a person’s odds of reoffending. In this study, prison time was the risk factor, proactive and reactive criminal thinking the needs factors, and institutional infractions the behavior. A sample of 1,101 men (mean age = 34.64 years) released from federal prison between 2003 and 2009 participated in a study where a moderated mediation design was employed. The interaction between proactive criminal thinking and time spent in prison was found to predict more infractions in prison, which, in turn, predicted increased levels of recidivism upon release from prison. These results suggest that time spent in prison may provide a context in which proactive criminal thinking encourages antisocial behavior in prison, which then puts the individual at risk for future offending.

Keywords

moderated mediation criminal thinking time in prison institutional infractions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alarid

L. F.

(2019). Community-based corrections (12th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Bhati

A. S.

Piquero

A. R.

(2007). Estimating the impact of incarceration on subsequent offending trajectories: Deterrent, criminogenic, or null effect? Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 98(1), 207–253.

Bonta

Andrews

(2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.

Bonta

Gendreau

(1990). Reexamining the cruel and unusual punishment of prison life. Law and Human Behavior, 14(4), 347–372.

Brunton-Smith

Hopkins

(2013). The factors associated with proven re-offending following release from prison: Findings from waves 1 to 3 of Surveying Prisoner Crime Reduction (SPCR) (Ministry of Justice analytical series). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/261620/re-offending-release-waves-1-3-spcr-findings.pdf

Caplan

J. M.

(2007). What factors affect parole: A review of empirical research. Federal Probation, 71(3), 16–19.

Carson

E. A.

(2020, October). Prisoners in 2019. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

Caudy

M. S.

Tillyer

M. S.

Tillyer

(2018). Jail versus probation: A gender specific test of differential effectiveness and moderators of sanction effects. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(7), 949–968.

Clark

V. A.

(2016). Predicting two types of recidivism among newly released prisoners: First addresses as “launch pads” for recidivism or reentry success. Crime & Delinquency, 62(10), 1364–1400.

10.

Clarke

Simmonds

Wydall

(2004). Delivering cognitive skills programmes in prison: A qualitative study (Home Office Online Report 27/04). Home Office. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/11967/1/Delivering%2520cognitive%2520skills.pdf

11.

Clemmer

(1940). The prison community. Christopher Publishing.

12.

Crayton

A. L.

(2012). Long-term incarceration and public safety: Predicting the recidivism risk of long-term prisoners (Dissertation/Thesis No. 3499225) [Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York].

13.

Cullen

F. T.

Fisher

B. S.

Applegate

B. K.

(2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. In Tonry

(Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 27, pp. 1–80). The University of Chicago Press.

14.

Durose

M. R.

Antenangeli

(2021, July). Recidivism of prisoners released in 34 states in 2012: A 5-year follow-up period (2012-2017). Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

15.

Durose

M. R.

Cooper

A. D.

Snyder

H. N.

(2014, April). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

16.

Farrington

D. P.

Ttofi

M. M.

Piquero

A. R.

(2016). Risk, promotive, and protective factors in youth offending: Results from the Cambridge study in delinquency development. Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 63–70.

17.

Gendreau

Goggin

Cullen

F. T.

(1999). The effects of prison sentences on recidivism. Solicitor General Canada.

18.

Gendreau

Little

Goggin

(1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!. Criminology, 34(4), 575–607.

19.

Goodley

Pearson

Morris

(2022). Predictors of recidivism following release from custody: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 28, 703–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1962866

20.

Gottfredson

M. R.

(1979). Parole board decision making: A study of disparity reduction and the impact of institutional behavior. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 70(1), 77–88.

21.

Gottfredson

M. R.

Hirschi

(1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.

22.

Harding

D. J.

Morenoff

J. D.

Nguyen

A. P.

Bushway

S. D.

(2017). Short and long-term effects of imprisonment on future felony convictions and prison admissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(42), 11103–11108.

23.

IBM. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (Version 26.0). IBM Corp.

24.

Jhi

K. Y.

Joo

(2009). Predictors of recidivism across major age groups of parolees in Texas. Justice Policy Journal, 6(1), 1–28.

25.

Katsiyannis

Whitford

D. K.

Zhang

Gage

N. A.

(2018). Adult recidivism in United States: A meta-analysis 1994–2015. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(3), 686–696.

26.

Kenny

D. A.

(2013). Mediation: Sensitivity analysis [Webinar]. http://davidakenny.net/webinars/Mediation/Sensitivity/Sensitivity.html

27.

Kolstad

(1996). Imprisonment as rehabilitation: Offenders’ assessment of why it does not work. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(4), 323–335.

28.

Landenberger

N. A.

Lipsey

(2005). The positive effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(4), 451–476.

29.

Langan

P. A.

Levin

D. J.

(2002, June). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

30.

Lemke

R. J.

(2010). The construction and validation of an institutional release risk and needs assessment [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati].

31.

Lovell

Johnson

L. C.

Cain

K. C.

(2007). Recidivism of supermax prisoners in Washington State. Crime & Delinquency, 53(4), 633–656.

32.

MacKenzie

D. L.

Bierie

Mitchell

(2007). An experimental study of a therapeutic boot camp: Impact on impulses, attitudes and recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3(3), 221–246.

33.

Manguno-Mire

G. M.

Coffman

K. L.

DeLand

S. M.

Thompson

J. W.

Jr. Myers

(2014). What factors are related to success on conditional release/discharge? Findings from the New Orleans Forensic Aftercare Clinic: 2002-2013. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 32(5), 641–658.

34.

Muthén

(1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).

35.

Nagin

D. S.

Cullen

F. T.

Jonson

C. L.

(2009). Imprisonment and reoffending. In Tonry

(Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 38, pp. 115–200). The University of Chicago Press.

36.

Olson

D. E.

Stalans

L. J.

Escobar

(2016). Comparing male and female prison releasees across risk factors and postprison recidivism. Women & Criminal Justice, 26(2), 122–144.

37.

Pearson

F. S.

Lipton

D. S.

(1999). A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of corrections-based treatments for drug abuse. The Prison Journal, 79(4), 384–410.

38.

Preacher

K. J.

(2015). Advances in mediation analysis: A survey and synthesis of new developments. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 825–852.

39.

Preacher

K. J.

Hayes

A. F.

(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.

40.

Quellette

J. A.

Wood

(1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54–74.

41.

Ruggero

Dougherty

Klofas

(2015, February). Measuring recidivism: Definitions, errors, and data sources (Working Paper #2015-03). Center for Public Safety Initiatives. https://www.rit.edu/liberalarts/sites/rit.edu.liberalarts/files/documents/our-work/2015-03%20-%20Measuring%20Recidivism%20-%20Definitions%2C%20Errors%2C%20and%20Data%20Sources.pdf

42.

The Sentencing Project. (2019, April). New prison and jail population figures released by U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.sentencingproject.org/news/new-prison-jail-population-figures-released-u-s-department-justice/

43.

Sobel

(1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methods, 13, 290–312.

44.

Steiner

Butler

H. D.

Ellison

J. M.

(2014). Causes and correlates of prison inmate misconduct: A systematic review of the evidence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(6), 462–470.

45.

Sykes

(2007). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1958)

46.

Walters

G. D.

(1995). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: Part I: Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22(3), 307–325.

47.

Walters

G. D.

(2003). Changes in criminal thinking and identity in novice and experienced inmates: Prisonization revisited. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(4), 399–421.

48.

Walters

G. D.

(2007). Predicting institutional adjustment with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles composite scales: Replication and extension. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12(1), 69–81.

49.

Walters

G. D.

(2012). Criminal thinking and recidivism: Meta-analytic evidence on the predictive and incremental validity of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(3), 272–278.

50.

Walters

G. D.

(2016a). Friends, cognition, and delinquency: Proactive and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the peer influence and peer selection effects. Justice Quarterly, 33(6), 1055–1079.

51.

Walters

G. D.

(2016b). From prison to the streets: Can importation work in reverse? Law and Human Behavior, 40(6), 660–669.

52.

Walters

G. D.

(2017). Reactive criminal thinking as a consequence of low self-control and prior offending. Deviant Behavior, 38(2), 119–129.

53.

Walters

G. D.

(2019). Gang influence: Mediating the gang–delinquency relationship with proactive criminal thinking. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(7), 1044–1062.

54.

Walters

G. D.

(2020a). Assessing the proactive and reactive dimensions of criminal thought process: Divergent patterns of correlation with variable- and person-level measures of criminal risk and future outcome. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(2), 223–230.

55.

Walters

G. D.

(2020b). Moral disengagement as a mediator of the co-offending–delinquency relationship in serious juvenile offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 44(5), 437–448.

56.

Walters

G. D.

(2021). Are the criminogenic effects of incarceration mediated by a change in criminal thinking or a change in perceived certainty? The Prison Journal, 101(1), 21–40.

57.

Walters

G. D.

Lowenkamp

C. T.

(2016). Predicting recidivism with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) in community-supervised male and female federal offenders. Psychological Assessment, 28(6), 652–659.

58.

Walters

G. D.

White

T. W.

Denney

(1991). The Lifestyle Criminality Screening Form: Preliminary data. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18(4), 406–418.

59.

Weatherburn

(2010). The effect of prison on adult re-offending (Crime and Justice Bulletin No. 143, p. 12). https://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Publications/CJB/cjb143.pdf

60.

Wilson

D. B.

Bouffard

L. A.

MacKenzie

D. L.

(2005). A quantitative review of structured, group-oriented, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(2), 172–204.