Significant in the management of a safe and secure custodial environment is the compliance of incarcerated persons with the prison rules and the directives of prison officers. In recent years, there has been increased research focus on the role of normative compliance in the prison environment, which is postulated to derive from the perceptions of legitimacy and procedural justice of those who are incarcerated. This article presents the findings of a scoping review of the empirical literature as it relates to procedural justice and legitimacy in prison settings. This literature is charted and then analyzed across two primary themes, namely “Shaping Perceptions of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy” and “Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance.” The presence of normative compliance in prisons and the contribution of procedurally just treatment to perceptions of legitimacy held by persons who are incarcerated are discussed.
AdamsJ. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 267–299). Academic Press.
2.
AgnewR. (2017). General strain theory: Current status and directions for further research. In CullenF.WrightJ. P.BlevinsK. R. (Eds.), Taking stock (pp. 101–123). Routledge.
3.
AkoensiT. D. (2016). Perceptions of self-legitimacy and audience legitimacy among prison officers in Ghana. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 40(3), 245–261.
4.
AkoensiT. D.TankebeJ. (2020). Prison officer self-legitimacy and support for rehabilitation in Ghana. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(1), 22–38.
5.
ArkseyH.O’MalleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.
6.
BakerT.AbderhaldenF. P.AlwardL. M.BedardL. E. (2021). Exploring the association between procedural justice in jails and incarcerated people’s commitment to institutional rules. Corrections, 6(2), 189–202.
7.
BarkworthJ. M.MurphyK. (2021). Procedural justice, posturing and defiant action: Exploring prisoner reactions to prison authority. Justice Quarterly, 38(3), 537–564.
8.
BeethamD. (1991). Max Weber and the legitimacy of the modern state. Analyse & Kritik, 13(1), 34–45.
9.
BeijersbergenK. A.DirkzwagerA. J.EichelsheimV. I.Van der LaanP. H.NieuwbeertaP. (2014). Procedural justice and prisoners’ mental health problems: A longitudinal study. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 24(2), 100–112.
10.
BeijersbergenK. A.DirkzwagerA. J.EichelsheimV. I.Van der LaanP. H.NieuwbeertaP. (2015). Procedural justice, anger, and prisoners’ misconduct: A longitudinal study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(2), 196–218.
11.
BeijersbergenK. A.DirkzwagerA. J.MollemanT.Van der LaanP. H.NieuwbeertaP. (2015). Procedural justice in prison: The importance of staff characteristics. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(4), 337–358.
12.
BeijersbergenK. A.DirkzwagerA. J.NieuwbeertaP. (2016). Reoffending after release: Does procedural justice during imprisonment matter?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(1), 63–82.
13.
BickersI.CreweB.MitchellR. J. (2019). Offender supervision, prisoners and procedural justice. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 58(4), 477–495.
14.
BierieD. M. (2013). Procedural justice and prison violence: Examining complaints among federal inmates (2000–2007). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(1), 15–29.
15.
BooneM.KoxM. (2014). Neutrality as an element of perceived justice in prison: Consistency versus individualization. Utrecht Law Review, 10(4), 118–131.
16.
BosmaA. Q. C.van GinnekenE. F.SentseM.PalmenH. (2020). Examining prisoner misconduct: A multilevel test using personal characteristics, prison climate, and prison environment. Crime & Delinquency, 66(4), 451–484.
17.
BottomsA.TankebeJ. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), 119–170.
18.
BrownA. D.ToyokiS. (2013). Identity work and legitimacy. Organization Studies, 34(7), 875–896.
19.
Brunton-SmithI.McCarthyD. J. (2016). Prison legitimacy and procedural fairness: A multilevel examination of prisoners in England and Wales. Justice Quarterly, 33(6), 1029–1054.
20.
CampbellC. M.LabrecqueR. M.SchaeferR. L.HarvisM.ZavitaK. R.ReddyL.LabrancheK. (2020). Do perceptions of legitimacy and fairness matter in prison? Examining how procedural and distributive justice relate to misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(12), 1630–1653.
21.
CarrabineE. (2005). Prison riots, social order and the problem of legitimacy. The British Journal of Criminology, 45(6), 896–913.
22.
CostaJ. P. (2016). A matter of degree: A justice framework for penal legitimacy. Punishment & Society, 18(4), 389–399.
23.
CreweB. (2011). Soft power in prison: Implications for staff–prisoner relationships, liberty and legitimacy. European Journal of Criminology, 8(6), 455–468.
24.
CreweB.LieblingA.HulleyS. (2011). Staff culture, use of authority and prisoner quality of life in public and private sector prisons. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 44(1), 94–115.
25.
DaneC. B. (2012). Examining the relationship between procedural justice and recidivism in a jail-based residential substance abuse treatment program [Master’s thesis, Georgia State University]. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cj_theses/6
26.
DaudtH. M.van MosselC.ScottS. J. (2013). Enhancing the scoping study methodology: A large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), Article 48.
27.
Del VecchioA. (2019). Procedural justice in the Connecticut Correctional System: An exploration of correlates and modifications through an intervention program [Doctoral dissertation, Yale University].
28.
FerdikF. V.SmithH. P. (2016). Maximum security correctional officers: An exploratory investigation into their social bases of power. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(3), 498–521.
29.
FrankeD.BierieD.MacKenzieD. L. (2010). Legitimacy in corrections: A randomized experiment comparing a boot camp with a prison. Criminology & Public Policy, 9(1), 89–117.
30.
FrenchJ. R.RavenB.CartwrightD. (1959). The bases of social power. In ShafritzJ.OttJ. S.JangY. S. (Eds.), Classics of organization theory (pp. 311–320). Cengage Learning.
31.
HacinR. (2018). Prisoners’ perceptions of legitimacy of prison staff in Slovenia. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 26(2), 160–181.
32.
HacinR.FieldsC. (2016). Justification of the dual model of legitimacy for its application in the prison environment. Journal of Criminal Justice and Security, 18(2), 230–244.
33.
HacinR.FieldsC.MeškoG. (2019). The self-legitimacy of prison staff in Slovenia. European Journal of Criminology, 16(1), 41–59.
34.
HacinR.MeškoG. (2018). Prisoners’ perception of legitimacy of the prison staff: A qualitative study in Slovene prisons. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(13), 4332–4350.
35.
HepburnJ. R. (1985). The exercise of power in coercive organizations: A study of prison guards. Criminology, 23(1), 145–164.
36.
Irwin RogersK. (2015). Beyond the prison gate: Licensees’ perceptions of the legitimacy of power holders [Doctoral thesis, University of Sheffield]. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/
37.
JacksonJ.TylerT. R.BradfordB.TaylorD.ShinerM. (2010). Legitimacy and procedural justice in prisons. Prison Service Journal, 191, 4–10.
38.
JennessV.CalavitaK. (2018). “It depends on the outcome”: Prisoners, grievances, and perceptions of justice. Law & Society Review, 52(1), 41–72.
39.
LieblingA. (2004). The late modern prison and the question of values. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 16(2), 202–219.
40.
LieblingA. (2011). Moral performance, inhuman and degrading treatment and prison pain. Punishment & Society, 13(5), 530–550.
41.
LieblingA.PriceD. (2003). Prison officers and the use of discretion. In GelsthorpeL.PadfieldN. (Eds.), Exercising discretion (pp. 74–97). Taylor & Francis.
42.
LindE. A.TylerT. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Springer.
43.
MaguireE. R.Atkin-PlunkC. A.WellsW. (2021). The effects of procedural justice on cooperation and compliance among inmates in a work release program. Justice Quarterly, 38, 1128–1153.
44.
MatekelC. G. (2018). Conditions of confinement, personality traits, and inmate perceptions of procedural justice [Master’s thesis, Arizona State University]. https://ccj.asu.edu/
45.
McCarthyD.Brunton-SmithI. (2018). The effect of penal legitimacy on prisoners’ post-release desistance. Crime & Delinquency, 64(7), 917–938.
46.
McCulloughK. (2018). Prisoners’ perceptions of procedural justice and legitimacy: Examining constructs and effects on recidivism [Doctoral dissertation, Sam Houston State University]. https://shsu-ir.tdl.org/handle/20.500.11875/2356
47.
MeškoG.HacinR. (2019). Social distance between prisoners and prison staff. The Prison Journal, 99(6), 706–724.
48.
MeškoG.HacinR. (2020). Self-legitimacy and use of force: A quantitative study of prison officers in Slovenia. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 44(12), 103–117.
49.
MeškoG.TankebeJ.FieldsC. (2017). Self-legitimacy, organisational commitment and commitment to fair treatment of prisoners: An empirical study of prison officers in Slovenia. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 25(1), 11–30.
50.
MurphyK. (2017). Procedural justice and its role in promoting voluntary compliance. In DrahosP. (Ed.), Regulatory theory: Foundations and applications (pp. 43–58). ANU Press.
51.
MurphyK.SargeantE.CherneyA. (2015). The importance of procedural justice and police performance in shaping intentions to cooperate with the police: Does social identity matter?European Journal of Criminology, 12(6), 719–738.
52.
NuñoL. E.MorrowW. J. (2020). Assessing the process-based model of regulation within a jail setting: Arrestees’ perceptions of procedural justice, trust and obligation to obey. Journal of Crime and Justice, 43(5), 676–691.
53.
RadburnM.StottC.BradfordB.RobinsonM. (2018). When is policing fair? Groups, identity and judgements of the procedural justice of coercive crowd policing. Policing and Society, 28(6), 647–664.
SmoyerA. B.KershawT. S.BlankenshipK. M. (2015). Confining legitimacy: The impact of prison experiences on perceptions of criminal justice legitimacy. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 5(1–3), 258–270.
56.
SparksJ. R. (1994). Can prisons be legitimate? “Penal politics, privatization, and the timeliness of an old idea.”The British Journal of Criminology, 34, 14–28.
57.
SparksJ. R.BottomsA. E. (1995). Legitimacy and order in prisons. British Journal of Sociology, 46(1), 45–62.
58.
SteinerB.WooldredgeJ. (2015). Examining the sources of correctional officer legitimacy. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 105(3), 679–703.
59.
SteinerB.WooldredgeJ. (2018). Prison officer legitimacy, their exercise of power, and inmate rule breaking. Criminology, 56(4), 750–779.
60.
StottC.DruryJ. (2000). Crowds, context and identity: Dynamic categorization processes in the “poll tax riot.”Human Relations, 53(2), 247–273.
61.
StottC.HoggettJ.PearsonG. (2012). “Keeping the peace” social identity, procedural justice and the policing of football crowds. The British Journal of Criminology, 52(2), 381–399.
62.
SymkovychA. (2018). Compromised power and negotiated order in a Ukrainian prison. The British Journal of Criminology, 58(1), 200–217.
63.
TankebeJ. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51(1), 103–135.
64.
ThibautJ. W.WalkerL. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum.
65.
TrammellR.CookA. R.MarquezM. V. D.HinkleP.ProtzeL. M.RodriguezN. (2018). From procedural justice to procedural injustice: Understanding prison staff and inmate conflict. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 57(4), 537–555.
66.
TylerT. R. (1990). Justice, self-interest, and the legitimacy of legal and political authority. In MansbridgeJ. J. (Ed.), Beyond self-interest (pp. 171–179). Thr University of Chicago Press.
67.
TylerT. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283–357.
68.
TylerT. R.BiesR. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In CarrollJ. S. (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings (pp. 98–120). Taylor & Francis.
69.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349–361.
70.
TylerT. R.HuoY. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. Russell Sage Foundation.
71.
TylerT. R.LindE. A. (2002). Procedural justice. In SandersJ.HamiltonV. L. (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 65–92). Springer.
72.
WooldredgeJ.SteinerB. (2016). The exercise of power in prison organizations and implications for legitimacy. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 106(1), 125–137.
