The Effect of Sanction Severity and Its Interaction With Procedural Justice

Abstract

Recent scholarship suggests that detention may have differential effects depending on situational factors. This longitudinal study tests an integrative theoretical framework with the aim to identify conditions under which detention deters from subsequent rule-violating behavior. We examined whether effects of experienced sanction severity on subsequent misconduct and reoffending behavior are dependent on procedural justice perceptions among Dutch adults in detention (n = 763 and n = 765, respectively). The deterrent effect of sanction severity on misconduct was dependent on procedural justice. Increased sanction severity only deterred from subsequent misconduct when treatment was perceived as procedurally neutral to just. For individuals who were detained for the first time, a similar interaction effect was observed for reoffending behavior. The results support the added value of integrating deterrence theory with situational characteristics (i.e., procedural justice) to explain sanctioning effects and suggest that correctional staffs’ relationships with individuals in detention can contribute to order in prison and beyond.

Keywords

deterrence recidivism procedural justice longitudinal prison

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aarten

P. G. M.

Denkers

Borgers

M. J.

van der Laan

P. H.

(2014). Suspending re-offending? Comparing the effects of suspended prison sentences and short-term imprisonment on recidivism in the Netherlands. European Journal of Criminology, 11(6), 702–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370814523402

Abbiati

Palix

Gasser

Moulin

(2019). Predicting physically violent misconduct in prison: A comparison of four risk assessment instruments. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 37(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2364

Aebi

M. F.

Delgrande

(2014). SPACE I—Council of Europe annual penal statistics: Prison populations. Survey 2012. Council of Europe.

Antrobus

Thompson

Ariel

(2019). Procedural justice training for police recruits: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15, 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9331-9

Apel

Nagin

D. S.

(2017). Perceptual deterrence. In Bernasco

Van Gelder

J.-L.

Elffers

(Eds.), The Oxford handbooks in criminology and criminal justice. The Oxford handbook of offender decision making (pp. 121–140). Oxford University Press.

Augustyn

M. B.

Ward

J. T.

(2015). Exploring the sanction-crime relationship through a lens of procedural justice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(6), 470–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.10.001

Baidawi

Trotter

Flynn

(2016). Prison experiences and psychological distress among older inmates. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 59(3), 252–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2016.1197353

Beccaria

C. B. M.

(1819). An essay on crimes and punishments (2nd American ed.). Philip H. Nicklin.(Original work published 1764)

Beijersbergen

K. A.

Dirkzwager

A. J. E.

Molleman

Van Der Laan

P. H.

Nieuwbeerta

(2015). Procedural justice in prison: The importance of staff characteristics. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(4), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X13512767

10.

Beijersbergen

K. A.

Dirkzwager

A. J. E.

Nieuwbeerta

(2016). Reoffending after release: Does procedural justice during imprisonment matter? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815609643

11.

Bentham

(1982). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation ( Burns

J. H.

Hart

H. L. A.

, Eds.). Methuen & Co. (Original work published 1970)

12.

Bhati

A. S.

Piquero

A. R.

(2007). Estimating the impact of incarceration on subsequent offending trajectories: Deterrent, criminogenic, or null effect. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 98(1), 207–254.

13.

Bosma

A. Q.

Esther

E. F. J.

Sentse

Palmen

(2020). Examining prisoner misconduct: A multilevel test using personal characteristics, prison climate, and prison environment. Crime & Delinquency, 66(4), 451–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719877347

14.

Bottoms

A. E.

(1999). Interpersonal violence and social order in prisons. Crime and Justice, 26, 205–281. https://doi.org/10.1086/449298

15.

Casey

B. J.

Caudle

(2013). The teenage brain: Self control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413480170

16.

Caudy

M. S.

Tillyer

M. S.

Tillyer

(2018). Jail versus probation: A gender-specific test of differential effectiveness and moderators of sanction effects. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(7), 949–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818766375

17.

Chalfin

McCrary

(2017). Criminal deterrence: A review of the literature. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(1), 5–48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20141147

18.

Cheeseman

K. A.

Kim

Lambert

E. G.

Hogan

N. L.

(2011). Correctional officer perceptions of inmates and overall job satisfaction. Journal of Crime and Justice, 34(2), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2011.580515

19.

Cochran

J. C.

Mears

D. P.

(2017). The path of least desistance: Inmate compliance and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 34(3), 431–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2016.1168476

20.

Crank

B. R.

Brezina

(2013). “Prison will either make ya or break ya”: Punishment, deterrence, and the criminal lifestyle. Deviant Behavior, 34(10), 782–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2013.781439

21.

Cullen

F. T.

Jonson

C. L.

Nagin

D. S.

(2011). Prisons do not reduce recidivism: The high cost of ignoring science. The Prison Journal, 91(3), 48S–65S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885511415224

22.

Dervan

L. E.

(2011). American prison culture in an international context: An examination of prisons in America, the Netherlands, and Israel. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 22, 413–428.

23.

Dirkzwager

A. J. E.

Nieuwbeerta

Beijersbergen

K. A.

Bosma

A. Q.

de Cuyper

Doekhie

Eichelsheim

de Goede

van der Laan

P. H.

Lamet

Palmen

Raaijmakers

Ramakers

Reef

van der Stelt

Wensveen

Wermink

(2018). Cohort profile: The prison project—A study of criminal behavior and life circumstances before, during, and after imprisonment in the Netherlands. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 4(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-017-0077-2

24.

Durose

M. R.

Cooper

A. D.

Snyder

H. N.

(2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010 (Report No. NCJ 244205). U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://intranet.americansforthearts.org/sites/default/files/recidivism0510.pdf

25.

Enders

C. K.

Tofighi

(2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121

26.

Fagan

Piquero

A. R.

(2007). Rational choice and developmental influences on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(4), 715–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00105.x

27.

Farrall

(2005). Officially recorded convictions for probationers: The relationship with self-report and supervisory observations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532504X15367

28.

Fox

Monette

(1992). Generalized collinearity diagnostics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(417), 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1992.10475190

29.

Gaes

G. G.

Camp

S. D.

(2009). Unintended consequences: Experimental evidence for the criminogenic effect of prison security level placement on post-release recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5(2), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-009-9070-z

30.

Gifford

(2019). Prison crime and the economics of incarceration. Stanford Law Review, 71(1), 71–135.

31.

Hjalmarsson

(2009). Juvenile jails: A path to the straight and narrow or to hardened criminality? Journal of Law and Economics, 52(4), 779–809. https://doi.org/10.1086/596039

32.

Huizinga

Henry

K. L.

(2008). The effect of arrest and justice system sanctions on subsequent behavior: Findings from longitudinal and other studies. In Liberman

A. M.

(Ed.), The long view of crime: A synthesis of longitudinal research (1st ed., pp. 220–254). Springer.

33.

Jackson

Tyler

T. R.

Bradford

Taylor

Shiner

(2010). Legitimacy and procedural justice in prisons. Prison Service Journal, 191, 4–10.

34.

Maguire

E. R.

Atkin-Plunk

C. A.

Wells

(2019). The effects of procedural justice on cooperation and compliance among inmates in a work release program. Justice Quarterly, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1634753

35.

Meade

Steiner

Makarios

Travis

(2013). Estimating a dose-response relationship between time served in prison and recidivism. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50(4), 525–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427812458928

36.

Nagin

D. S.

Snodgrass

G. M.

(2013). The effect of incarceration on re-offending: Evidence from a natural experiment in Pennsylvania. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29, 601–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-012-9191-9

37.

Paternoster

(2010). How much do we really know about criminal deterrence. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 100(3), 765–824. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25766109

38.

Paternoster

Brame

Bachman

Sherman

L. W.

Law

Review

Sherman

L. W.

(1997). Do fair procedures matter ? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31(1), 163–204. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054098

39.

Petersilia

(2011). Beyond the prison bubble. The Wilson Quarterly, 35(1), 50–55.

40.

Piquero

A. R.

Paternoster

Pogarsky

Loughran

(2011). Elaborating the individual difference component in deterrence theory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 7, 335–360. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105404

41.

Pogarsky

(2007). Deterrence and individual differences among convicted offenders. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-006-9019-6

42.

Raaijmakers

E. A. C.

Loughran

T. A.

de Keijser

J. W.

Nieuwbeerta

Dirkzwager

A. J. E.

(2017). Exploring the relationship between subjectively experienced severity of imprisonment and recidivism: A neglected element in testing deterrence theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427816660588

43.

Reisig

M. D.

Mesko

(2009). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and prisoner misconduct. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802089768

44.

Scott

(2007). The changing face of the English prison: A critical review of imprisonment. In Jewkes

(Ed.), Handbook on prisons (1st ed., pp. 49–72). Willan Publishing.

45.

Sherman

L. W.

(1993). Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: A theory of the criminal sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(4), 445–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030004006

46.

Steiner

Wooldredge

(2015). Individual and environmental sources of work stress among prison officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(8), 800–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814564463

47.

Tomlinson

K. D.

(2016). An examination of deterrence theory: Where do we stand. Federal Probation, 80(3), 33–38.

48.

Tyler

T. R.

(1988). What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law & Society Review, 22(1), 103–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053563

49.

Tyler

T. R.

Blader

S. L.

(2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07

50.

van Ginneken

E. F. J. C.

Palmen

Bosma

A. Q.

Nieuwbeerta

Berghuis

M. L

. (2018). The Life in Custody study: The quality of prison life in Dutch prison regimes. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 4(4), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-07-2018-0020

51.

Verboon

van Dijke

(2011). When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The role of procedural fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(1), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.09.007

52.

Verboon

van Dijke

(2012). The effect of perceived deterrence on compliance with authorities: The moderating influence of procedural justice. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 1, 151–161. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2012.01.15

53.

Walters

G. D.

(2021). Are the criminogenic effects of incarceration mediated by a change in criminal thinking or a change in perceived certainty? Prison Journal, 101(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885520978374

54.

Wermink

Blokland

Nieuwbeerta

Nagin

Tollenaar

(2010). Comparing the effects of community service and short-term imprisonment on recidivism: A matched samples approach. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6, 325–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9097-1

55.

Yukhnenko

Sridhar

Fazel

(2019). A systematic review of criminal recidivism rates worldwide: 3-year update [Version 3]. Wellcome Open Research, 4, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14970.3

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB