Sentencing Females Convicted of Sex Offenses: Examining Measures of Perceived Dangerousness and the Decision to Incarcerate

Abstract

From media attention to legislative actions, individuals convicted of sex offenses are often perceived as dangerous and a threat to society. Previous research, however, has demonstrated that perceived dangerousness is gender-specific, often minimizing culpability for women convicted of sex offenses. Consequently, previous research on sentencing outcomes of these individuals have largely been male-only samples, leaving a gap in the literature as it pertains to females convicted of sex offenses. The current study sought to fill this gap by examining the impact that those convicted, victims, and offense characteristics had on sentencing outcomes for women convicted of sex offenses. We analyzed a sample of 262 females convicted of a sex offense in a Southern state. The results demonstrated that official case characteristics, along with victim characteristics, play an influential role in the judicial decision to impose an incarceration sentence.

Keywords

sex offender sentencing women offenders incarceration quantitative methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albonetti

(1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/800532

Amirault

Beauregard

(2014). The impact of aggravating and mitigating factors on the sentence severity of sex offenders: An exploration and comparison of differences between offending groups. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25(1), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403412462234

Anderson

E. A.

(1976). The “chivalrous” treatment of the female offender in the arms of the criminal justice system: A review of the literature. Social Problems, 23(3), 350–357. https://doi.org/10.2307/799780

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2010). The psychology of criminal conduct. Routledge.

Berliner

Schram

Miller

L. L.

Milloy

C. D.

(1995). A sentencing alternative for sex offenders: A study of decision making and recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10(4), 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626095010004007

Berman

D. A.

(2005). Distinguishing offense conduct and offender characteristics in modern sentencing reforms. Stanford Law Review, 58(1), 277–291.

Bushway

S. D.

Johnson

B. D.

Slocum

L. A.

(2007). Is the magic still there? The use of the Heckman two-step correction for selection bias in criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 151–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-007-9024-4

Bushway

S. D.

Piehl

A. M.

(2001). Judging judicial discretion: Legal factors and racial discrimination in sentencing. Law & Society Review, 35(4), 733–764. https://doi.org/10.2307/3185415

Chesney-Lind

(1986). “Women and crime”: The female offender. Signs, 12(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1086/494298

10.

Cohen

T. H.

(2017). Automating risk assessment instruments and reliability. Criminology & Public Policy, 16, 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12272

11.

Cortoni

Babchishin

K. M.

Rat

(2017). The proportion of sexual offenders who are female is higher than thought. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816658923

12.

Darling

A. J.

Hackett

Jamie

(2018). Female sex offenders who abuse children whilst working in organizational contexts: Offending, conviction, and sentencing. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 24(2), 196–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2018.1476601

13.

DeCou

C. R.

Cole

T. T.

Rowland

S. E.

Kaplan

S. P.

Lynch

S. M.

(2015). An ecological process model of female sex offending: The role of victimization, psychological distress, and life stressors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214556359

14.

Denov

M. S.

(2001). A culture of denial: Exploring professional perspectives on female sex offending. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43(3), 303–329.

15.

Denov

M. S.

(2003). The myth of innocence: Sexual scripts and the recognition of child sexual abuse by female perpetrators. The Journal of Sex Research, 40(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552195

16.

Duwe

Rocque

(2017). Effects of automating recidivism risk assessment on reliability, predictive validity, and return on investment (ROI). Criminology & Public Policy, 16(1), 235–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12270

17.

Embry

Lyons

P. M.

(2012). Sex-based sentencing: Sentencing discrepancies between male and female sex offenders. Feminist Criminology, 7(2), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085111430214

18.

Engen

R. L.

Gainey

R. R.

(2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology, 38(4), 1207–1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb01419.x

19.

Graziano

P. A.

Reavis

R. D.

Keane

S. P.

Calkins

S. D.

(2007). The role of emotion regulation in children’s early academic success. Journal of School Psychology, 45(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.002

20.

Grimm

Harp

(2011). Happily ever after: Myth, rape, and romance in magazine coverage of the Mary Kay Letourneau case. Journal of Magazine & New Media Research, 2(12), 1–18.

21.

Hanson

R. K.

Bussiere

M. T.

(1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.348

22.

Hassett-Walker

Lateano

Di Benedetto

(2014). Do female sex offenders receive preferential treatment in criminal charging and sentencing? Justice System Journal, 35(1), 62–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2013.868278

23.

Kingsnorth

R. F.

MacIntosh

R. C.

Wentworth

(1999). Sexual assault: The role of prior relationship and victim characteristics in case processing. Justice Quarterly, 16(2), 275–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829900094141

24.

Koons-Witt

B. A.

Sevigny

E. L.

Burrow

J. D.

Hester

(2014). Gender and sentencing outcomes in South Carolina: Examining the interactions with race, age, and offender type. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25(3), 299–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403412468884

25.

Levesque

R. J. R.

(2000). Sentencing sex crimes against children: An empirical and policy analysis. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0798(200003/06)18:2/3<331::AID-BSL400>3.0.CO;2-7

26.

Lewis

C. F.

Stanley

C. R.

(2000). Women accused of sexual offenses. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(200001/02)18:1<73::AID-BSL378>3.0.CO;2-%23

27.

Mathews

Matthews

J. K.

Speltz

(1989). Female sexual offenders: An exploratory study. Safer Society Press.

28.

McCormick

J. S.

Maric

Seto

M. C.

Barbaree

H. E.

(1998). Relationship to victim predicts sentence length in sexual assault cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13(3), 413–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626098013003007

29.

Mellor

Deering

(2010). Professional response and attitudes toward female-perpetrated child sexual abuse: A study of psychologists, psychiatrists, probationary psychologists and child protection workers. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 16(5), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160902776850

30.

Miller

H. A.

Marshall

E. A.

(2019). Comparing solo- and co-offending female sex offenders on variables of pathology, offense characteristics, and recidivism. Sexual Abuse, 31(8), 972–990. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063218791179

31.

Patrick

Marsh

(2011). Sentencing outcomes of convicted child sex offenders. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 20, 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2011.541356

32.

Peduzzi

Concato

Kemper

Holford

T. R.

Feinstein

A. R.

(1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(12), 1373–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3

33.

Quinn

J. F.

Forsyth

C. J.

Mullen-Quinn

(2004). Societal reaction to sex offenders: A review of the origins and results of the myths surrounding their crimes and treatment amenability. Deviant Behavior, 25, 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620490431147

34.

Ratliff

Watson

(2014). A descriptive analysis of public school educators arrested for sex offenses. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 23(2), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2014.870275

35.

Rodriguez

S. F.

Curry

T. R.

Lee

(2006). Gender differences in criminal sentencing: Do effects vary across violent, property, and drug offenses. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00383.x

36.

Sample

L. L.

Bray

T. M.

(2003). Are sex offenders dangerous? Criminology & Public Policy, 3(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2003.tb00024.x

37.

Shields

R. T.

Cochran

J. C.

(2020). The gender gap in sex offender punishment. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36, 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09416-x

38.

Spohn

(2009). Race, sex, and pretrial detention in federal court: Indirect effects and cumulative disadvantage. Kansas Law Review, 57, 879–901.

39.

Steely

Ten Bensel

(2020). Child sexual abuse within educational settings: A qualitative study on female teachers who sexually abuse their students. Deviant Behavior, 41(11), 1440–1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2019.1624288

40.

Steffensmeier

Demuth

(2006). Does gender modify the effects of race-ethnicity on criminal sanctioning? Sentences for male and female, white, black, and Hispanic defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-006-9010-2

41.

Steffensmeier

Ulmer

Kramer

(1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x

42.

ten Bensel

Gibbs

Burkey

C. R

. (2019). Female sex offenders: Is there a difference between solo and co-offenders? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(19), 4061–4084. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516674202

43.

ten Bensel

Gibbs

B. R.

Raptopoulos

. (2019). The role of childhood victimization on the severity of adult offending among female sex offenders. Victims & Offenders, 14(6), 758–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2019.1630044

44.

Thompson

Rydberg

Cassidy

Socia

K. M.

(2020). Contextual influences on the sentencing of individuals convicted of sexual crimes. Sexual Abuse, 32(7), 778–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063219852936

45.

Ulmer

J. T.

Bradley

M. S.

(2006). Variation in trail penalties among serious violent offenses. Criminology, 44(3), 631–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00059.x

46.

Ulmer

J. T.

Johnson

(2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42(1), 137–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00516.x

47.

Vandiver

D. M.

(2006). Female sex offenders: A comparison of solo offenders and co-offenders. Violence and Victims, 21(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.21.3.339

48.

Vandiver

D. M.

Kercher

(2004). Offender and victim characteristics of registered female sexual offenders in Texas: A proposed typology of female sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SEBU.0000023061.77061.17

49.

Walsh

(1994). Homosexual and heterosexual child molestation: Case characteristics and sentencing differentials. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 38(4), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X9403800406

50.

Warren

Chiricos

Bales

(2012). The imprisonment penalty for young Black and Hispanic males: A crime-specific analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49(1), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810397945

51.

Wheeler

Weisburd

Bode

(1982). Sentencing the white-collar offender: Rhetoric and reality. American Sociological Review, 47(5), 641–659. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095164

52.

Wilmot

K. A.

Spohn

(2004). Prosecutorial discretion and real-offense sentencing: An analysis of relevant conduct under the federal sentencing guidelines. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15(3), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403403259434

53.

Wright

(Ed.). (2014). Sex offender laws: Failed policies, new directions. Springer.

54.

Spohn

(2009). Does an offender’s age have an effect on sentence length? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20(4), 379–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403409333047

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB