Starting With Girls and Their Resilience in Mind: Reconsidering Risk/Needs Assessments for System-Involved Girls

Abstract

Despite the numerous differences between boys and girls in the juvenile justice system, there are currently no gender-responsive risk/needs assessments for system-impacted girls, thereby limiting agencies to the use of gender-neutral risk/needs assessments. This article examines commonly used gender-neutral risk/needs assessments and illustrates how these instruments are not truly “neutral.” We argue that predictive validity is not enough to demonstrate effectiveness; these tools can harm and possibly discriminate against girls by placing them in similarly labeled risk categories (i.e., high, medium, low) as boys, despite engaging in less delinquency. This practice of force-fitting girls to assessments primarily developed for boys results in over- and misclassification of girls’ risk and fails to capture their gendered needs and resilience. We see this as an opportunity to reconsider risk assessments altogether for girls and propose a resilience/needs assessment may be better suited to identify girls’ needs and predict future behavior.

Keywords

risk assessment gender juvenile justice delinquency gender differences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Bar Association. (1996). Juvenile justice standards, annotated: A balanced approach. Shepherd

R. E.

(Ed.). https://ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/166773.pdf

American Bar Association. (2018). Standards on treatment of prisoners. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/publications/criminal_justice_section_archive/crimjust_standards_treatmentprisoners

American Psychological Association. (2019). The road to resilience. https://www.apa.org/helpcenter/road-resilience

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(1995). The Level of Service Inventory–Revised. Multi-Health Systems.

Arnold

(1990). Women of color: Processes of victimization and criminalization of Black women. Social Justice, 17(3), 153–166.

Atlas

(Dir.). (2019). Pushout: The criminalization of black girls in schools [Film]. Women in the Room Productions.

Baglivio

(2009). The assessment of risk to recidivate among a juvenile offending population. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(6), 596–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.09.008

Baglivio

Epps

Swartz

Huq

M. S.

Sheer

Hardt

(2014). The prevalence of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in the lives of juvenile offenders. Journal of Juvenile Justice, 3(2), 1–17.

Baglivio

Jackowski

(2013). Examining the validity of a juvenile offending risk assessment instrument across gender and race/ethnicity. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204012440107

10.

Baird

Healy

Johnson

Bogie

Dankert

E. W.

Scharenbroch

(2013). A comparison of risk assessment instruments in juvenile justice. National Council on Crime and Delinquency. https://www.nccdglobal.org/sites/default/files/publication_pdf/nccd_fire_report.pdf

11.

Barnes

Campbell

Anderson

Campbell

Onifade

Davidson

(2016). Validity of initial, exit, and dynamic juvenile risk assessment: An examination across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 55(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2015.1107004

12.

Barnoski

(1998). Validation of the Washington State Juvenile Court Assessment: Interim report. Washington State Institute for Public Policy. https://www.wsipp.wa.gov/ReportFile/1295/Wsipp_Validation-of-the-Washington-State-Juvenile-Court-Assessment-Interim-Report_Full-Report.pdf

13.

Belknap

(2007). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

14.

Belknap

Holsinger

(2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 48–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085105282897

15.

Benard

(2004). Resilience: What we have learned. WestEd.

16.

Benard

(2007). The foundations of the resilience paradigm. In Henderson

Benard

Sharp-Light

(Eds.), Resilience in action: Practical ideas for overcoming risks and building strengths in youth, families, and communities (pp. 3–7). Resilience in Action, Inc.

17.

Blanchette

Brown

S. L.

(2006). The Assessment and treatment of women offenders: An integrative perspective. John Wiley.

18.

Bloom

Covington

(2001). Effective gender-responsive interventions in juvenile justice: Addressing the lives of delinquent girls. Paper presented at the 2001 American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting. https://www.centerforgenderandjustice.org/assets/files/7.pdf

19.

Bloom

Owen

Covington

(2003a). Gender responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders.

20.

Bloom

Owen

Rosenbaum

Deschenes

E. P.

(2003b). Focusing on girls and young women: A gendered perspective on female delinquency. Women & Criminal Justice, 14(2–3), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1300/J012v14n02_06

21.

Bolt

D. M.

Hare

R. D.

Vitale

J. E.

Newman

J. P.

(2004). A multigroup item response theory analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Psychological Assessment, 16(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.16.2.155

22.

Bonta

Andrews

D. A.

(2016). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Anderson.

23.

Born

Chevalier

Humblet

(1997). Resilience, desistance, and delinquent career of adolescent offenders. Journal of Adolescence, 20(6), 679–694. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1997.0119

24.

Borum

Bartel

Forth

(2003). Manual for the structured risk assessment of violence in youth (SAVRY), version 1.1. University of South Florida.

25.

Borum

Bartel

Forth

(2020). SAVRY: Structured assessment of violence risk in youth. Psychological Assessment Resources. https://www.parinc.com/Products/Pkey/390

26.

Campbell

Papp

Barnes

Onifade

Anderson

(2018). Risk assessment and juvenile justice: An interaction between risk, race, and gender. Criminology & Public Policy, 17(3), 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12377

27.

Cauffman

Feldman

Waterman

Steiner

(1998). Posttraumatic stress disorder among female juvenile offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 37(11), 1209–1216. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199811000-00022

28.

Chesney-Lind

Shelden

R. G.

(2014). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice (4th ed.). John Wiley.

29.

Corbett-Davis

Goel

(2018). The measure and mismeasure of fairness: A critical review of fair machine learning. Cornell University. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.00023.pdf

30.

DeHart

Moran

(2015). Poly-victimization among girls in the justice system: Trajectories of risk and associations to juvenile offending. Violence against Women, 21(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214568355

31.

Edens

Campbell

Weir

(2006). Youth psychopathy and criminal recidivism: A meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist measures. Law and Human Behavior, 31(1), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9019-y

32.

Embretson

S. E.

Reise

S. P.

(2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Erlbaum.

33.

Emeka

Sorensen

(2009). Female juvenile risk: Is there a need for gendered assessment instruments? Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7(4), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204009334083

34.

Engelhardt

J. A.

(2012). The developmental implications of parentification effects on childhood attachment. Graduate Student Journal of Psychology, 14, 45–52.

35.

Epstein

Blake

Gonzalez

(2012). Girlhood interrupted: The erasure of Black girls’ childhood. Center on Poverty and Inequality, Georgetown Law.

36.

Espinosa

E. M.

Sorensen

J. R.

Walfield

(2019). Youth pathways: Evaluating the influence of gender, involvement with the public mental health system, perceived mental health need, and traumatic experiences on juvenile justice system processing. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 18(3), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204019889664

37.

Fagan

Van Horn

M. L.

Hawkins

J. D.

Arthur

M. W.

(2007). Gender similarities and differences in the association between risk and protective factors and self-reported serious delinquency. Prevention Science, 8, 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-006-0062-1

38.

Fausto-Sterling

(2012). Sex/gender: Biology in a social world. Routledge.

39.

Flores

A. W.

Travis

L. F.

Latessa

E. J.

(2004). Case classification for juvenile corrections: An assessment of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLC/CMI), final report. National Criminal Justice Reference Service. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/204005.pdf

40.

Forth

A. E.

Kosson

D. S.

Hare

R. D.

(2003). The Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version manual. Multi-Health Systems.

41.

Fougere

Daffern

(2011). Resilience in young offenders. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(3), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2011.598602

42.

Fougere

Daffern

Thomas

(2015). Does resilience predict recidivism in young offenders? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(2), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2014.936333

43.

Garcia

C. A.

Lane

(2013). What a girl wants, what a girl needs: Findings from a gender-specific focus group study. Crime & Delinquency, 59(4), 536–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128709331790

44.

Gilligan

(1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.

45.

Gorman

D. C.

(2014). A conceptualization of resiliency for delinquent youth and review of resiliency scales for potential application to delinquent youth and recidivism [Publication No. 10185031, Doctoral dissertation]. William James College.

46.

Gottfredson

D. M.

(1987). Prediction and classification in criminal justice decisions making. Crime and Justice, 9, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1086/449130

47.

Hamilton

(2019). The sexist algorithm. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 37(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2406

48.

Hamilton

Kowalski

M. A.

Schaefer

Kigerl

(2020). Recrafting youth risk assessment: Developing the Modified Positive Achievement Change tool for Iowa. Deviant Behavior, 41(10), 1268–1289. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2019.1609302

49.

Hamilton

van Wormer

Barnoski

(2015). PACT validation and weighing results technical report. Washington State University, Washington Association of Juvenile Court Administrators. https://s3.wp.wsu.edu/uploads/sites/436/2017/02/PACT-Study-Final3.pdf

50.

Hardyman

P. L.

Van Voorhis

(2004). Developing gender-specific classification systems for women offenders. National Institute of Corrections.

51.

Hare

R. D.

(1991). Manual for the Revised Psychopathy Checklist (1st ed.). Multi-Health Systems.

52.

Hilterman

Bongers

Nicholls

Nieuwenhuizen

(2015). Identifying gender specific risk/need for male and female juvenile offenders: Factor analysis with the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). Law and Human Behavior, 40(1), 182–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000158

53.

Hoge

R. D.

Andrews

D. A.

Leschied

A. W.

(2002). The youth level of service/case management inventory. Multi-Health Systems.

54.

Hooper

L. M.

(2007). Expanding the discussion regarding parentification and its varied outcomes: Implications for mental health research and practice. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 29(4), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.29.4.48511m0tk22054j5

55.

Innis-Thompson

M. N.

(2017). Summary of discipline data for girls in U.S. public schools: An analysis from the 2013-14 U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights data collection. National Black Women’s Justice Institute https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/0c71ee_56ca58a75f8840908dca5decbf6701f6.pdf

56.

Juvenile Justice, Geography, Policy, Practice, & Statistics. (2017). Juvenile justice services. http://www.jjgps.org/juvenile-justice-services#evidence-based-practices?tabId=2&view=risk-instruments

57.

Jones

N. J.

Brown

S. L.

Robinson

Frey

(2016). Validity of the Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument: A juvenile justice tool incorporating risks, needs, and strengths. Law and Human Behavior, 40(2), 182–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000170

58.

Jurkovic

G. J.

(1997). Lost childhoods: The plight of the parentified child. Brunner/Mazel.

59.

Kim-Cohen

(2007). Resilience and developmental psychopathology. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 16(2), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2006.11.003

60.

Latessa

Smith

Lemke

Makarios

Lowenkamp

(2009). Creation and validation of the Ohio Risk Assessment System: Final report. Center for Criminal Justice Research, University of Cincinnati. https://www.assessments.com/assessments_documentation/ORAS/ORAS_Final_Report_and_Validation.pdf

61.

Lodewijks

de Ruiter

Doreleijers

T. A. H.

(2008). Gender differences in violent outcome and risk assessment in adolescent offenders after residential treatment. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 7(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2008.9914410

62.

Marshall

Egan

English

Jones

(2006). The relative validity of psychopathy versus risk/needs-based assessments in the prediction of adolescent offending behavior. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11(2), 97–210. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532505X68719

63.

Matz

A. K.

Martinez

A. R.

(2019). Juvenile risk assessment: Assessing the evaluability and predictive validity of the Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument for use among the North Dakota juvenile probation population. University of North Dakota, Criminal Justice Faculty Publications. https://commons.und.edu/cj-fac/2

64.

McKnight

L. R.

Loper

A. B.

(2002). The effect of risk and resilience factors of the prediction of delinquency in adolescent girls. School Psychology International, 23(2), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034302023002744

65.

Monahan

Dmitrieva

Cauffman

(2014). Bad romance: Sex differences in the longitudinal association between romantic relationships and deviant behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12019

66.

Morris

M. W.

(2016). Pushout: The criminalization of Black girls in schools. The New Press.

67.

Morris

M. W.

(2018). Why Black girls are targeted for punishment at school—and how to change that [Video]. TEDWomen. https://www.ted.com/talks/monique_w_morris_why_black_girls_are_targeted_for_punishment_at_school_and_how_to_change_that/reading-list?referrer=playlist-itunes_podcasts_education&language=en#t-154034

68.

Mowder

M. H.

Cummings

J. A.

McKinney

(2010). Resilience scales for children and adolescents: Profiles of juvenile offenders. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28(4), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282910366838

69.

Multi-Health Systems Inc. (2020, June 27) YLS/CMI 2.0. Multi-health assessments. https://storefront.mhs.com/collections/yls-cmi-2-0

70.

Myers

J. R.

Schmidt

(2008). Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment for Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) with juvenile offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(3), 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854807311972

71.

Newsome

Vaske

J. C.

Gehring

K. S.

Boisvert

D. L.

(2016). Sex differences in sources of resilience and vulnerability to risk for delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 4, 5730–5745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0381-2

72.

Olver

Stockdale

Wormith

J. S.

(2009). Risk assessment with young offenders: A meta-analysis of three assessment measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(4), 329–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809331457

73.

Onifade

Davidson

Campbell

(2009). Risk assessment: The predictive validity of the Youth Level of Service Case Management Inventory with African Americans and girls. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 7(3), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377930903143544

74.

Orbis Partners. (2000). Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument (YASI).

75.

Orbis Partners. (2014). A summary of YASI validation research [Unpublished document].

76.

Pearl

Ashcraft

R. G. P.

Geis

K. A.

(2009). Predicting juvenile recidivism using the San Diego Regional Resilience Check-Up. Federal Probation, 73(3), 46–49.

77.

Penney

Lee

Moretti

(2010). Gender differences in risk factors for violence: An examination of the predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth. Aggressive Behavior, 36(6), 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20352

78.

Prince

(2008). Measurement validity in cross-cultural research. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 17(3), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1121189x00001305

79.

Prince-Embury

(2008). The Resilience Sales for Children and Adolescents, psychological symptoms, and clinical status in adolescents. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 23(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573508316592

80.

Pusch

Holtfreter

(2018). Gender and risk assessment in juvenile offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(1), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817721720

81.

Rice

M. E.

Harris

G. T.

(1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 737–748. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.63.5.737

82.

Rust

Golombok

(1989). Modern psychometrics: The science of psychological assessment. Routledge.

83.

Saar

M. S.

Epstein

Rosenthal

Vafa

(2015). The sexual abuse to prison pipeline: The girls’ story. Center on Poverty and Inequality, Georgetown Law. https://rights4girls.org/wp-content/uploads/r4g/2015/02/2015_COP_sexual-abuse_report_final.pdf

84.

Salisbury

E. J.

(2016). When gender neutral is not good enough in working with women. https://info.nicic.gov/virt/node/29

85.

Salisbury

E. J.

(2019, November). Actuarial malpractice and responsible risk assessment. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, CA.

86.

Salisbury

E. J.

Boppre

Kelly

(2016). Gender-responsive risk and need assessment: Implications for the treatment of justice-involved women. In Taxman

(Ed.), Risk and need assessment: Theory and practice (pp. 220–243). Taylor & Francis.

87.

Schmidt

McKinnon Chattha

Brownlee

(2006). Concurrent and predictive validity of the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version across gender and ethnicity. Psychological Assessment, 18(4), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.4.393

88.

Schmidt

Hoge

R. D.

Gomes

(2005). Reliability and validity analysis of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854804274373

89.

Schwalbe

(2008). A meta-analysis of juvenile justice risk assessment instruments: Predictive validity by gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(11), 1367–1381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808324377

90.

Scott

Brown

Skilling

(2019). Predictive and convergent validity of the Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument in a sample of male and female justice-involved youth. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(6), 811–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854819842585

91.

Scott

Brown

S. L.

(2018). Risks, strengths, gender, and recidivism among justice-involved youth: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86, 11931–11945. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000343

92.

Shepherd

Luebbers

Dolan

(2013). Gender and ethnicity in juvenile risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(4), 388–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812456776

93.

Shufelt

Cocozza

(2006). Youth with mental health disorders in the juvenile justice system: Results from a multi-state prevalence study. National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice. https://www.ncmhjj.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/7.-PrevalenceRPB.pdf

94.

Sickmund

Sladky

Kang

(2019). Easy access to juvenile court statistics. National Center for Juvenile Justice. https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezajcs/

95.

Sickmund

Sladky

T. J.

Kang

Puzzanchera

(2019). Easy access to the census of juveniles in residential placement. National Center for Juvenile Justice. https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezacjrp/asp/display.asp

96.

Singh

Grann

Fazel

(2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tool: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychological Review, 31(3), 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.009

97.

Skeem

Monahan

Lowenkamp

(2016). Gender, risk assessment, and sanctioning: The cost of treating women like men. Law and Human Behavior, 40(5), 580–593. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000206

98.

Stockdale

K. C.

Olver

M. E.

Wong

S. C. P.

(2010). The Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version and adolescent and adult recidivism: Considerations with respect to gender, ethnicity, and age. Psychological Assessment, 22(4), 768–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020044

99.

Turner

Fain

(2006). Validation of the Risk and Resilience Assessment Tool for juveniles in the Los Angeles county probation system. Federal Probation, 70, 49–57.

100.

Ungar

(2008). Resilience across cultures. The British Journal of Social Work, 38(2), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl343

101.

United Nations. (1985). United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (The Beijing Rules).

102.

United Nations. (2010). United Nations rules for the treatment of women prisoners and non-custodial measures for women offenders (the Bangkok rules).

103.

United States of America vs. State of Alabama Department of Corrections. (2015). U.S. District Court. https://www.justice.gov/opa/file/450776/download

104.

Van Voorhis

. (2012). On behalf of women offenders: Women’s place in the science of evidence-based practices (Vollmer Award Address). Criminology & Public Policy, 11(2), 111–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00793.x

105.

Van Voorhis

Bauman

Bruschett

. (2012). Revalidation of the Women’s Risk Needs Assessment: Pre-release results. National Institute of Corrections.

106.

Van Voorhis

Bauman

Bruschett

. (2013). Revalidation of the Women’s Risk Needs Assessment: Probation results. National Institute of Corrections.

107.

Van Voorhis

Salisbury

E. J.

Wright

Bauman

. (2008). Achieving accurate pictures and identifying gender responsive needs: Two new assessments for women offenders. National Institute of Corrections.

108.

Van Voorhis

Wright

Salisbury

E. J.

Bauman

. (2010). Women’s risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of gender-responsive assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(3), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809357442

109.

Vincent

Odgers

McCormick

Corrado

(2008). The PCL:YV and recidivism in male and female juveniles: A follow-up into young adulthood. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31(3), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.04.012

110.

Wagnild

G. M.

Young

H. M.

(1993). Development and psychometric evaluation of the resilience scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 1(2), 165–178.

111.

Welsh

Schmidt

McKinnon

Chattha

H. K.

Meyers

(2008). A comparative study of adolescent risk assessment instruments: Predictive and incremental validity. Assessment, 15(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107307966

112.

Winkor-Early

Hand

G. A.

Blankenship

(2012). Validity and reliability of the Florida PACT risk and needs assessment instrument: A three-phase evaluation. http://www.djj.state.fl.us/docs/probation-policy-memos/jrc-comprehensive-pact-validity-and-reliability-study-report-2012.pdf

113.

Zahn

(2007). The causes of girls’ delinquency and their program implications. Family Court Review, 45(3), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00161.x

114.

Zahn

Hawkins

Chiancone

Whitworth

(2008). Girls study group. https://ojjdp.ojp.gov/funding/awards/2004-jf-fx-k001#supplemental-award-0-0