This study examined the psychometric, predictive, and dynamic properties of intimate partner violence (IPV) risk. The sample consisted of 88 men attending an outpatient IPV correctional program. The Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA) was rated at pretreatment using participant files. The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment–Version 3 (SARA-V3) was rated at pre- and posttreatment using collateral information (e.g., facilitator ratings, files) and participant questionnaires. Recidivism data were obtained from a court database with an average follow-up of 15 months. The SARA-V3 and ODARA demonstrated strong convergent validity and predicted violent and general recidivism with moderate to high accuracy; SARA-V3 posttreatment ratings incremented the ODARA in the prediction of recidivism, yet not vice versa. Noncompleters were higher risk and had higher recidivism rates. Changes on the SARA-V3’s Perpetrator Risk Factors domain were significantly associated with decreased recidivism in bivariate analyses and some change associations remained significant with stringent controls for risk. Implications for risk assessment/management, service planning, and future research are discussed.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (1995). LSI-R: The Level of Service Inventory–Revised. Multi-Health Systems.
2.
BabcockJ. C.GreenC. E.RobieC. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023–1053. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2002.07.001
3.
BeggsS. M.GraceR. C. (2011). Treatment gain for sexual offenders against children predicts reduced recidivism: A comparative validity study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 182. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0022900
4.
BirkleyE. L.EckhardtC. I. (2015). Anger, hostility, internalizing negative emotions, and intimate partner violence perpetration: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 37, 40–56. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.002
BoxallH.RosevearL.PayneJ. (2015). Identifying first-time family violence perpetrators: The usefulness and utility of categorisations based on police offense records. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 487, 1–8.
CampbellJ. C.WebsterD. W.GlassN. (2009). The danger assessment: Validation of a lethality risk assessment instrument for intimate partner femicide. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(4), 653–674. http://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508317180
9.
CohenT. H.LowenkampC. T.VanBenschotenS. W. (2016). Does change in risk matter? Examining whether changes in offender risk characteristics influence recidivism outcomes. Criminology & Public Policy, 15, 263–296. http://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12190
De Vries RobbéM.de VogelV.DouglasK. S.NijmanH. L. (2015). Changes in dynamic risk and protective factors for violence during inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment: Predicting reductions in postdischarge community recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 53–61. http://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000089
12.
DouglasK. S.SkeemJ. L. (2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 347–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.3.347
13.
DunfordF. W. (2000). The San Diego Navy experiment: An assessment of interventions for men who assault their wives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 468–476. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.3.468
14.
GannonT. A.OlverM. E.MallionJ. S.JamesM. (2019). Does specialized psychological treatment for offending reduce recidivism? A meta-analysis examining staff and program variables as predictors of treatment effectiveness. Clinical Psychology Review, 73, 101752. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101752
15.
García-MorenoC.PallittoC.DevriesK.StöcklH.WattsC.AbrahamsN. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. World Health Organization.
16.
GoldingJ. M. (1999). Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for mental disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 99–132. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022079418229
17.
GraciaE. (2004). Unreported cases of domestic violence against women: Towards an epidemiology of social silence, tolerance, and inhibition. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58, 536–537. http://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.019604
18.
HansonR. K.HelmusL.BourgonG. (2007). The validity of risk assessments for intimate partner violence: A meta-analysis (Corrections Research User Report No. 2007–07). Public Safety Canada.
HareR. D. (2003). Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R) (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.
21.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E. (1997). Risk appraisal and management of violent behavior. Psychiatric Services, 48(9), 1168–1176. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.48.9.1168
22.
HelmusL.BourgonG. (2011). Taking stock of 15 years of research on the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA): A critical review. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 64–75. http://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2010.551709
23.
HerreroJ.TorresA.Fernández-SuárezA.Rodríguez-DíazF. (2016). Generalists versus specialists: Toward a typology of batterers in prison. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 8(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2015.09.002
24.
HiltonN. Z.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E. (2010). Risk assessment for domestically violent men. American Psychological Association.
25.
HiltonN. Z.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.HoughtonR. E.EkeA. W. (2008). An in-depth actuarial assessment for wife assault recidivism: The Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 150–163. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9088-6
26.
HiltonN. Z.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.LangC.CormierC. A.LinesK. J. (2004). A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: The Ontario domestic assault risk assessment. Psychological Assessment, 16, 267–275. http://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.16.3.267
27.
JungS.BuroK. (2017). Appraising risk for intimate partner violence in a police context. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44, 240–260. http://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816667974
28.
KroppP. R.HartS. D. (2000). The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) Guide: Reliability and validity in adult male offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 101–118. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005430904495
29.
KroppP. R.HartS. D. (2015). SARA-V3. User guide for the third edition of the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment. ProActive Resolutions Inc.
LewisK.OlverM. E.WongS. C. (2013). The Violence Risk Scale: Predictive validity and linking changes in risk with violent recidivism in a sample of high-risk offenders with psychopathic traits. Assessment, 20, 150–164. http://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112441242
32.
MessingJ. T.ThallerJ. (2013). The average predictive validity of intimate partner violence risk assessment instruments. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 1537–1558. http://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512468250
33.
NorlanderB.EckhardtC. (2005). Anger, hostility, and male perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 119–152. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.10.001
34.
OlverM. E.JungS. (2017). Incremental prediction of intimate partner violence: An examination of three risk measures. Law and Human Behavior, 41, 440–453. http://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000251
35.
OlverM. E.NicholaichukT. P.KingstonD. A.WongS. C. (2020). A prospective multisite examination of dynamic sexual violence risk: Extension and update to Olver, Nicholaichuk, Kingston, and Wong (2014). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 88, 362–371. http://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000478
36.
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C.WormithJ. S. (2011). A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 6–21. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0022200
37.
OlverM. E.WongS. C. (2011). A comparison of static and dynamic assessment of sexual offender risk and need in a treatment context. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 113–126. http://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810389534
38.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615–620. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
39.
RichardsT. N.JenningsW. G.TomsichE.GoverA. (2014). A 10-year analysis of rearrests among a cohort of domestic violence offenders. Violence and Victims, 29(6), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-13-00145
40.
RyanT. J. (2016). An examination of the interrater reliability and concurrent validity of the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide–Version 3 (SARA-V3) [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Simon Fraser University.
41.
SewallL. A.OlverM. E. (2019). Psychopathy and treatment outcome: Results from a sexual violence reduction program. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10, 59–69. http://doi.org/10.1037/per0000297
42.
SinghV.TolmanR.WaltonM.ChermackS.CunninghamR. (2014). Characteristics of men who perpetrate intimate partner violence. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 27, 661–668. http://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2014.05.130247
StithS. M.SmithD. B.PennC. E.WardD. B.TrittD. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 65–98. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.09.001
45.
TabachnickB.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
46.
van der PutC. E.GubbelsJ.AssinkM. (2019). Predicting domestic violence: A meta-analysis on the predictive validity of risk assessment tools. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 47, 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.03.008
47.
WilliamsK. R. (2012). Family violence risk assessment: A predictive cross-validation study of the Domestic Violence Screening Instrument-Revised (DVSI-R). Law and Human Behavior, 36, 120–129. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0093977
