The Intake Assessment (IA) process in the Canadian federal correctional system results in an individualized treatment and supervision plan throughout the sentence. Two components, Static and Dynamic Factors Assessment, were examined to determine whether a streamlined version could be tailored for a hand-held mobile application and remain reliable and valid for correctional planning purposes. An Information Management System database was used to identify all first releases from federal custody over a 2-year period who had IA data available (N = 6,946). Analyses revealed statistically significant relationships and AUCs (area under receiver operating characteristic curves) for both the Static and Dynamic Factors components of IA with respect to reincarceration. Additional analyses revealed that the strongest predictors for returns to federal custody were criminal history as a youth or adult, substance misuse, and unemployment. A combined Static and Dynamic Factors score also yielded a simplified, robust, and incremental predictor of reincarceration for both men and women.
AndrewsD. A. (1996). Criminal recidivism is predictable and can be influenced: An update. Forum on Corrections Research, 8(3), 42–44.
3.
AndrewsD. A. (2001). Principles of effective correctional programs. In MotiukL. L.SerinR. C. (Eds.), Compendium 2000 on effective correctional programming (Vol. 1, pp. 9–17). Correctional Service of Canada. https://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/research/com2000-chap_2-eng.shtml
4.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (1994). The psychology of criminal conduct. Anderson Publishing.
5.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018362
6.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.HogeR. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017001004
7.
BairdS.HeinzR.BemusB. (1979). The Wisconsin case classification/staff development project: A two-year follow-up report. Wisconsin Bureau of Community Corrections.
8.
BolandF. J.BakerJ.HendersonK. (1998). Case needs review: Substance abuse domain (R-75). Correctional Service of Canada.
9.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.
10.
BontaJ.BogueB.CrowleyM.MotiukL. (2001). Implementing offender classification systems: Lessons learned. In BernfeldG. A.FarringtonD. P.LeschiedA. W. (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice: Implementing and evaluating effective programs (pp. 227–246). John Wiley.
11.
BontaJ.MotiukL. L. (1985). Utilization of an interview-based classification instrument: A study of correctional halfway houses. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12(3), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854885012003004
12.
BontaJ.MotiukL. L. (1987). The diversion of incarcerated offenders to correctional halfway houses. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24(4), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427887024004006
BrownS. L.MotiukL. L. (2005). The Dynamic Factors Identification and Analysis (DFIA) component of the Offender Intake Assessment (OIA) process: A meta-analytic, psychometric and consultative review (R-164). Correctional Service of Canada.
15.
ChadwickN.ChernerR.CrawfordA.FasholaS.GaudreaultS.HarrisA.JohnsonS.WannamakerK. (2019). Evaluation of correctional reintegration programs. Correctional Service Canada.
16.
ClearT. R.GallagherK. W. (1983). Screening devices in probation and parole: Management problems. Evaluation Review, 7(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8300700204
17.
CordingJ. R.ChristoffersonS. M. B. (2017). Theoretical and practical issues for the measurement of protective factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 32, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.12.007
CouplandR.OlverM. E. (2020). Assessing protective factors in treated violent offenders: Associations with recidivism reduction and positive community outcomes. Psychological Assessment, 32(5), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000807
30.
GaesG. G.FlanaganT. J.MotiukL. L.StewartL. (1999). Adult correctional treatment. In TonryM.PetersiliaJ. (Eds.), Prisons (pp. 361–426). University of Chicago Press.
31.
GatesM.DowdenC.BrownS. (1998). Case need domain: Community functioning. Forum on Corrections Research, 10(3), 35–37.
32.
GendreauP.GogginC.GrayG. (2000). Case needs review: Employment domain (R-90). Correctional Service Canada.
GendreauP.MaddenP. G.LeipcigerM. (1979). Norms and recidivism for first incarcerates: Implications for programming. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 21, 416–441.
35.
GendreauP.MaddenP. G.LeipcigerM. (1980). Predicting recidivism with social history information and a comparison of their predictive power with psychometric variables. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 22, 328–336.
36.
GlaserD. (1964). The effectiveness of a prison and parole system. Bobbs-Merrill.
37.
GlueckS.GlueckE. (1930). Five hundred criminal careers. Knopf.
38.
GogginC.GrayG.GendreauP. (1998). Case needs review: Associates/social interaction domain (R-77). Correctional Service Canada.
39.
GottfredsonD. (1967). Assessment and prediction methods in crime and delinquency In President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice, Task Force Report: Juvenile Delinquency and Youth Crime. U.S. Government Printing Office.
40.
GottfredsonS. D.GottfredsonD. M. (1980). Screening for risk: A comparison of methods. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 7(3), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/009385488000700306
41.
HealeyJ. F.PrusS. G.LieflanderR. (2019). Statistics: A tool for social research (4th Canadian ed.). Nelson.
42.
HelmusL.ForresterT. (2014a). Construct validity of the Static Factors Assessment (R-309). Correctional Service Canada.
43.
HelmusL.ForresterT. (2014b). Static Factors Assessment (SFA) in the offender intake assessment process (R-339). Correctional Service Canada.
44.
LawM. A. (1998). Case need domain: Attitude. Forum on Corrections Research, 10(3), 42–45.
45.
McGuireJ. E. (1995). What works: Reducing reoffending: Guidelines from research and practice. John Wiley.
46.
MonahanJ. (1981). Predicting violent behavior: An assessment of clinical techniques. SAGE.
47.
MooreR. (2015). A compendium of research and analysis on the Offender Assessment System (OASys) 2009-2013. UK Ministry of Justice Analytical Services.
48.
MotiukL. L. (1993). Where are we in our ability to assess risk. Forum on Corrections Research, 5(2), 14–18.
49.
MotiukL. L. (1995). Prediction and classification in corrections. In MotiukL. L.OgloffJ. P. (Eds.), Forensic psychology: Policy and practice in corrections (pp. 30–35). Correctional Service of Canada.
50.
MotiukL. L. (1997). Classification for correctional programming: The offender intake assessment (OIA) process. Forum on Corrections Research, 9(1), 18–22.
51.
MotiukL. L. (1998). The offender intake assessment (OIA) process: From research to practice. In E. E. Rhine (Ed.), Best practices: Excellence in corrections (pp. 337–340). American Correctional Association.
52.
MotiukL. L. (2016). Performance outcomes in the delivery of the Integrated Correctional Program Model (ICPM) to Federal Offenders (Research in Brief 16-01). Correctional Service Canada.
53.
MotiukL. L. (2018). Changes in the size of the federal offender population: 2000 to 2018 (Research in Brief 18-16). Correctional Service Canada.
54.
MotiukL. L.BrownS. L. (1993). The validity of case needs identification and analysis in community corrections (R-34). Correctional Service Canada.
55.
MotiukL. L.PorporinoF. J. (1989a). Field test of the Community Risk/Needs Management Scale: A study of offenders on caseload (R-6). Correctional Service Canada.
56.
MotiukL. L.PorporinoF. J. (1989b). Offender risk/needs assessment: A study of conditional releases (R-1). Correctional Service Canada.
57.
MotiukL. L.SerinR. C. (Eds.). (2001). Compendium 2000 on effective correctional programming (Vol. 1). Correctional Service Canada.
58.
MotiukL. L.VuongB. (2016). Effectiveness of the Integrated Correctional Program Model (ICPM) for federal offenders identified as perpetrators of spousal assault (Research in Brief 16-02). Correctional Service Canada.
59.
MotiukL. L.VuongB. (2018). The development and validation of a Criminal Risk Index (CRI) for federally sentenced offenders in Canada (R-403). Correctional Service Canada.
60.
NafekhM.MotiukL. L. (2002). The Statistical Information on Recidivism, Revised 1 (SIR-R1) Scale: A psychometric examination (R-126). Correctional Service Canada.
61.
NuffieldJ. (1982). Parole decision-making in Canada: Research towards decision guidelines. Communication Division, Solicitor General of Canada.
62.
PaolucciE. O.ViolatoC.SchofieldM. A. (2000). A review of marital and family variables as they relate to adult criminal recidivism (R-92). Correctional Service Canada.
RiceM.HarrisG. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
RobinsonD.PorporinoF. J.BealC. A. (1998). A review of the Personal/emotional needs factors (R-76). Correctional Service Canada.
68.
SchnurA. C. (1949). Prison conduct and recidivism. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 40(1), 36–42.
69.
StewartL. A.WardropK.WiltonG.ThompsonJ.DerkzenD.MotiukL. L. (2017a). Indigenous offenders: Major findings from the DFIA-R research studies (R-395_I). Correctional Service Canada.
70.
StewartL. A.WardropK.WiltonG.ThompsonJ.DerkzenD.MotiukL. L. (2017b). Reliability and validity of the dynamic factors identification and analysis–Revised (R-395). Correctional Service Canada.
71.
StewartL. A.WardropK.WiltonG.ThompsonJ.DerkzenD.MotiukL. L. (2017c). Women offenders: Major findings from the DFIA-R research studies (R-395_W). Correctional Service Canada.
72.
StewartL. A.WiltonG.BagloleS.MillerR. (2019). A comprehensive study of recidivism rates among federal offenders (R-426). Correctional Service Canada.
73.
TaylorG. (1998). Offender needs-Providing the focus for our correctional interventions. Forum on Corrections Research, 10(3), 3–8.
WormithJ. S.AlthouseR.SimpsonM.ReitzelL. R.FaganT. J.MorganR. D. (2007). The rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders: The current landscape and some future directions for correctional psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(7), 879–892. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854807301552
76.
WormithJ. S.GoldstoneC. S. (1984). The clinical and statistical prediction of recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 11(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854884011001001
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
