This pre–post follow-up randomized trial investigated the receptiveness and responsiveness of 82 incarcerated men undergoing reentry to feedback (discussion-based, form-based, or none–minimal) regarding their criminogenic risk–needs assessment results. Both short-term outcomes (self-perceived risk–needs, motivation for change, treatment readiness, and feedback satisfaction) and longer-term outcomes (intuitional conduct, rearrest, or halfway house return) were examined. As hypothesized, among study completers (n = 67), motivation for change was significantly higher following discussion feedback, and both feedback formats were rated favorably by participants. Contrary to hypotheses, feedback recipients, including those who showed gains at post, did not appear reliably distinct from others on longer-term outcomes; nor were most outcomes significantly associated with baseline risk scores. Feedback about risk and needs may be useful in correctional treatment for motivation enhancement and treatment orienting, but special attention to measurement, contextual, and intensity factors is warranted.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Routledge.
3.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithS. J. (2004). Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI). Multi-Health Systems.
4.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithS. J. (2010). The level of service (LS) assessment of adults and older adolescents. In OttoR. K.DouglasK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 199–225). Routledge.
5.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithS. J. (2011). The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model: Does adding the good lives model contribute to effective crime prevention?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(7), 735–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811406356
6.
AnstissB.PolaschekD. L. L.WilsonM. (2011). A brief motivational intervention with prisoners: When you lead a horse to water, can it drink for itself?Psychology, Crime and Law, 17(8), 689–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160903524325
7.
AustinK. P.WilliamsM. W. M.KilgourG. (2011). The effectiveness of motivational interviewing with offenders: An outcome evaluation. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40(1), 55–67.
BollichK. L.JohannetP. M.VazireS. (2011). In search of our true selves: Feedback as a path to self-knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 312. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00312
10.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.
11.
Brooks HollidayS.HeilbrunK.FretzR. (2012). Examining improvements in criminogenic needs: The risk reduction potential of a structured re-entry program. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30(4), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2016
12.
Brooks HollidayS.KingC.HeilbrunK. (2013). Offenders’ perceptions of risk factors for self and others: Theoretical importance and some empirical data. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(9), 1044–1061. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813482308
CarrollK. M.EastonC. J.NichC.HunkeleK. A.NeavinsT. M.SinhaR.FordH. L.VitoloS. A.DoebrickC. A.RounsavilleB. J. (2006). The use of contingency management and motivational/skills-building therapy to treat young adults with marijuana dependence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(5), 955–966. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.955
15.
CaseyS.DayA.HowellsK.WardT. (2007). Assessing the suitability for offender rehabilitation: Development and validation of the treatment readiness questionnaire. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(11), 1427–1440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854807305827
16.
CurryK. T.HansonW. E. (2010). National survey of psychologists’ test feedback training, supervision, and practice: A mixed methods study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(4), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.482006
17.
DayA.CaseyS.WardT.HowellsK.VessJ. (2010). Transition to better lives: Offender readiness and rehabilitation. Willan.
18.
DayA.HowellsK.CaseyS.WardT.ChambersJ. C.BirgdenA. (2009). Assessing treatment readiness in violent offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(4), 618–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508317200
DuriezS. A.SullivanC.LatessaE. J.LovinsL. B. (2018). The evolution of correctional program assessment in the age of evidence-based practices. Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research, 3(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2017.1343104
21.
DvoskinJ. A.SkeemJ. L.NovacoR. W.DouglasK. S. (Eds.). (2012). Using social science to reduce violent offending. Oxford University Press.
22.
EpleyN.DunningD. (2006). The mixed blessings of self-knowledge in behavioral prediction: Enhanced discrimination but exacerbated bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205284007
23.
FallowsR. R.HilsabeckR. C. (2013). Comparing two methods of delivering neuropsychological feedback. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28(2), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acs142
24.
FinnS. E. (2007). In our clients’ shoes: Theory and techniques of therapeutic assessment. Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
FinnS. E.TonsagerM. E. (1997). Information-gathering and therapeutic models of assessment: Complementary paradigms. Psychological Assessment, 9(4), 374–385.
26.
HansonW. E.PostonJ. M. (2011). Building confidence in psychological assessment as a therapeutic intervention: An empirically based reply to Lilienfeld, Garb, and Wood (2011). Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 1056–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025656
27.
HarperR.HardyS. (2000). An evaluation of motivational interviewing as a method of intervention with clients in a probation setting. British Journal of Social Work, 30(3), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/30.3.393
28.
KistenmacherB. R.WeissR. L. (2008). Motivational Interviewing as a mechanism for change in men who batter: A randomized controlled trial. Violence and Victims, 23(5), 558–570. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.5.558
29.
LabrecqueR. M.CampbellC. M.ElliottJ.KingM.ChristmannM.PageK.McVayJ.RollerK. (2017). An examination of the inter-rater reliability and rater accuracy of the level of service/case management inventory. Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research, 3(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2017.1323253
LowenkampC. T.LatessaE. J.HolsingerA. M. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs?Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705281747
McConnaughyE. A.DiClementeC. C.ProchaskaJ. O.VelicerW. F. (1989). Stages of change in psychotherapy: A follow-up report. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 26(4), 494–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085468
34.
McConnaughyE. A.ProchaskaJ. O.VelicerW. F. (1983). Stages of change in psychotherapy: Measurement and sample profiles. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 20(3), 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0090198
35.
McMurranM. (2009). Motivational interviewing with offenders: A systematic review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532508X278326
36.
McMurranM.WardT. (2010). Treatment readiness, treatment engagement and behaviour change. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 20(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.762
37.
MillerW. R.RollnickS. (2009). Toward a theory of motivational interviewing. American Psychologist, 64(6), 527–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016830
38.
MillerW. R.ZwebenA.DiClementeC. C.RychtarikR. C. (1992). Motivational enhancement therapy manual: A clinical research guide for therapists treating individuals with alcohol abuse and dependence (NIH Publication No. 94-3723). http://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/ProjectMatch/match02.pdf
39.
MossièreA.SerinR. C. (2014). A critique of models and measures of treatment readiness in offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(4), 383–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.06.004
OgrodniczukJ. S.JoyceA. S.PiperW. E. (2005). Strategies for reducing patient-initiated premature termination of psychotherapy. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 13(2), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10673220590956429
42.
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C.WormithS. J. (2011). A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022200
43.
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C.WormithS. J. (2014). Thirty years of research on the level of service scales: A meta-analytic examination of predictive accuracy and sources of variability. Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 156–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035080
44.
Peterson-BadaliM.SkillingT.HaqaneeZ. (2015). Examining implementation of risk assessment in case management for youth in the justice system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(3), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814549595
45.
ProchaskaJ. O.DiClementeC. C.NorcrossJ. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47(9), 1102–1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.9.1102
46.
PolaschekD. L. L.AnstissB.WilsonM. (2010). The assessment of offending-related stage of change in offenders: Psychometric validation of the URICA with male prisoners. Psychology, Crime and Law, 16(4), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802698766
47.
PostonJ. M.HansonW. E. (2010). Meta-analysis of psychological assessment as a therapeutic intervention. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018679
RossE. C.PolaschekD. L. L.WardT. (2008). The therapeutic alliance: A theoretical revision for offender rehabilitation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(6), 462–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.07.003
50.
SinhaR.EastonC.Renee-AubinL.CarrollK. M. (2003). Engaging young probation-referred marijuana-abusing individuals in treatment: A pilot study. American Journal on Addictions, 12(4), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1521-0391.2003.tb00546.x
51.
SmithS. R.WigginsC. M.GorskeT. T. (2007). A survey of psychological assessment feedback practices. Assessment, 14(3), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107302842
52.
SturgessD.WoodhamsJ.TonkinM. (2016). Treatment engagement from the perspective of the offender: Reasons for noncompletion and completion of treatment—A systematic review. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(16), 1873–1896. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15586038
53.
TroqueteN. A. C.van den BrinkR. H. S.BeintemaH.MulderT.van OsT. W. D. P.SchoeversR. A.WiersmaD. (2013). Risk assessment and shared care planning in out-patient forensic psychiatry: Cluster randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 202(5), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.112.113043
54.
WaltersS. T.VaderA. M.NguyenN.HarrisT. R.EellsJ. (2010). Motivational interviewing as a supervised strategy in probation: A randomized effectiveness trial. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49(5), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2010.489455
55.
WardT.DayA.HowellsK.BirgdenA. (2004). The multifactor offender readiness model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(6), 645–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.08.001
56.
WormithJ. S.ZidenbergA. M. (2018). The historical roots, current status, and future applications of the risk-need-responsivity model (RNR). In JeglicE. L.CalkinsC. (Eds.), New frontiers in offender treatment (pp. 11–41). Spring. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01030-0_2
