Pretrial risk assessments are used to inform pretrial release decisions by judicial officers and criminal justice entities. Existing research indicates that negative perceptions of risk assessment can interfere with adherence to the tool. Although perception plays an important role in the implementation of pretrial risk assessment, little is known about what those involved in the initial pretrial release decision—including pretrial officers, judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys—think about this practice. This study utilized a mixed-methods approach to examine the perceptions of pretrial risk assessment by practitioners and stakeholders across roles in the system. Furthermore, themes relevant to the perceived value of pretrial risk assessment are identified that pertain to the face validity of risk items and the reliability of self-reported information.
AndrewsD.BontaJ.WormithJ. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 7–27.
2.
AresC.RankinA.SturzH. (1963). The Manhattan Bail Project: An interim report on the use of pre-trial parole. New York University Law Review, 38(1), 67–95.
3.
BechtelK.HolsingerA.LowenkampC.WarrenM. (2017). A meta-analytic review of pretrial research: Risk assessment, bond type, and interventions. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(2), 443–467.
4.
BechtelK.LowenkampC.HolsingerA. (2011). Identifying the predictors of pretrial failure: A meta-analysis. Federal Probation, 75(2), 78–87.
5.
BontaJ. (2002). Offender risk assessment: Guidelines for selection and use. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(4), 355–379.
6.
BontaJ.BogueB.CrowleyM.MotiukL. (2001). Implementing offender classification systems: Lessons learned. In BernfeldG.FarringtonD.LeschiedA. (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice: Implementing and evaluating effective programs (pp. 227–245). John Wiley.
7.
BontaJ.WormithS. (2008). Risk and need assessment. In McIvorG.RaynorP. (Eds.), Developments in social work with offenders (pp. 131–152). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
8.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
9.
CaseyP.ElekJ.WarrenR.CheesmanF.KleimanM.OstromB. (2014). Offender risk & needs assessment instruments: A primer for courts. National Center for State Courts.
10.
CreswellJ. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE.
11.
DeMicheleM.BaumgartnerP.BarrickK.ComfortM.ScaggsS.MisraS. (2019). What do criminal justice professionals think about risk assessment at pretrial?Federal Probation, 83(1), 32–41.
12.
DesmaraisS.JohnsonK.SinghJ. (2016). Performance of recidivism risk assessment instruments in US correctional settings. Psychological Services, 13(3), 206–222.
DillmanD. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode survey: The tailored design. John Wiley.
15.
DoyleM.DolanM. (2002). Violence risk assessment: Combining actuarial and clinical information to structure clinical judgements for the formulation and management of risk. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 9(6), 649–657.
16.
EckhouseL.LumK.Conti-CookC.CiccoliniJ. (2019). Layers of bias: A unified approach for understanding problems with risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(2), 185–209.
17.
FergusonJ. (2002). Putting the “what works” research into practices: An organizational perspective. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(4), 472–492.
18.
FloresW.LowenkampC.HolsingerA.LatessaE. (2006). Predicting outcome with the Level of Service Intentory–Revised: The importance of implementation intergrity. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 523–529.
19.
GoldkampJ. (1993). Judicial responsibility for pretrial release decision making and the information role of pretrial services. Federal Probation, 57(1), 28–35.
20.
GottfredsonD.GottfredsonS.ConlyC. (1989). Stakes and risk: Incapacitative intent in sentencing decisions. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7(1), 91–106.
21.
GottfredsonS.MoriartyL. (2006). Statistical risk assessment: Old problems and new applications. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 178–200.
22.
ImanR.ConoverW. (1979). The use of the rank transform in regression. Technometrics, 21(4), 499–509.
23.
KatzB.McSweeneyM. (1980). A multivariate Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc procedures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 15(3), 281–297.
24.
LatessaE.LovinsB. (2010). The role of offender risk assessment: A policy maker guide. Victims and Offenders, 5(3), 203–219.
25.
LowenkampC.VanNostrandM.HolsingerA. (2013). The hidden costs of pretrial detention. Laura & John Arnold Foundation.
26.
MamalianC. (2011). State of the science of pretrial risk assessment. Bureau of Justice Assistance.
27.
MillerJ.MaloneyC. (2013). Practitioner compliance with risk/needs assessment tools: A theoretical and empirical assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(7), 716–736.
28.
SchnackeT. (2014). Fundamentals of bail: A resource guide for pretrial practitioners and a framework for American pretrial reform. National Institute of Corrections.
29.
VincentG.GuyL.GrissoT. (2012). Risk assessment in juvenile justice: A guidebook for implementation. MacArthur Foundation.
