Given the centrality of pedohebephilic interest in understanding sexual offending against children, several interventions have been developed to help men manage or inhibit their sexual arousal to children to reduce the intensity of their experience of such arousal. A meta-analytic review was conducted to examine the effectiveness of interventions for managing pedohebephilic arousal, as measured by phallometric testing. A systematic literature review identified 23 within-group design studies and 18 single-case design studies (N = 1,071) for analysis. Behavioral and pharmacological interventions showed moderate to large effects for reducing pedohebephilic arousal. Moderator analyses suggest that men with high pretreatment pedohebephilic arousal showed the greatest reductions in arousal. Small effects were found for comprehensive treatment programs; none of the interventions had the effect of increasing sexual arousal to adults. These results support the effectiveness of behavioral and pharmacological interventions for managing pedohebephilic arousal in men convicted of sexual offenses against children.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.
3.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley.
4.
BradfordJ. M.PawlakA. (1993). Effects of cyproterone acetate on sexual arousal patterns of pedophiles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 629–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01543305
5.
BurdaB. U.O’ConnorE. A.WebberE. M.RedmondN.PerdueL. A. (2017). Estimating data from figures with a web-based program: Considerations for a systematic review. Research Synthesis Methods, 8, 258–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1232
6.
BrankleyA. E. (2019). A taxometric analysis of pedophilia in adult males convicted of sexual offences: Evidence for a taxon [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ryerson University.
7.
Canadian Psychological Association. (2012). Evidence-based practice of psychological treatments: A Canadian perspective.
CantorJ. M.McPhailI. V. (2015). Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for hebephilia. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12, 1940–1950. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12970
10.
CotterA.BeaupréP. (2014). Police reported sexual offences against children and youth in Canada, 2012 (Juristat, Statics Canada Catalogue no. 85-002-X). Statistics Canada.
11.
CrolleyJ.RoysD.ThyerB. A.BordnickP. S. (1998). Evaluating outpatient behavior therapy of sex offenders: A pretest-posttest study. Behavior Modification, 22, 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455980224003
12.
CuijpersP.WeitzE.CristeaI. A.TwiskJ. (2017). Pre-post effect sizes should be avoided in meta-analyses. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 26, 364–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796016000809
13.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
14.
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
GannonT. A.OlverM. E.MallionJ. S.JamesM. (2019). Does specialized psychological treatment for offending reduce recidivism? A meta-analysis examining staff and program variables as predictors of treatment effectiveness. Clinical Psychology Review, 73, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101752
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
19.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014421
20.
HigginsJ.ThompsonS. G.DeeksJ. J.AltmanD. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327, 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
IoannidisJ. P.TrikalinosT. A. (2007). The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: A large survey. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 176, 1091–1096. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.060410
23.
JanssenE. (Ed.). (2007). The psychophysiology of sex. Indiana University Press.
24.
JohnstonP.HudsonS. M.MarshallW. L. (1992). The effects of masturbatory reconditioning with nonfamilial child molesters. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 559–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(92)90043-G
25.
JonesD. T. (2014). An evaluation of the use of phallometric assessment for men incarcerated for sexually offending against children in New Zealand: Past results and future directions [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Waikato.
KendallP. C.Marrs-GarciaA.NathS. R.SheldrickR. C. (1999). Normative comparison for the evaluation of clinical significance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006X.67.3.285
28.
LakensD. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177
29.
LawsD. R.MarshallW. L. (1991). Masturbatory reconditioning with sexual deviates: An evaluative review. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 13, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(91)90012-Y
30.
LewisA.GrubinD.RossC. C.DasM. (2017). Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist treatment for sexual offenders: A systematic review. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 31, 1281–1293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881117714048
31.
LuborskyL.RosenthalR.DiguerL.AndrusynaT. P.BermanJ. S.LevittJ. T.. . .KrauseE. D. (2002). The dodo bird verdict is alive and well—Mostly. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.9.1.2
32.
MannR. E.HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210366039
33.
MarshallW. L.FernandezY. M. (2003). Phallometric testing with sexual offenders: Theory, research, and practice. Safer Society Press.
34.
MarshallW. L.MarshallL. E.SerranG. A.O’BrienM. D. (2011). Rehabilitating sex offenders: A strength-based approach. American Psychological Association.
35.
MarshallW. L.O’BrienM. D.MarshallL. E. (2009). Modifying sexual preferences. In
BeechA. R.CraigL. A.BrowneK. D. (Eds.), Assessment and treatment of sexual offenders: A handbook (pp. 311–327). John Wiley & Sons.
36.
McAleaveyA. A.YounS. J.XiaoH.CastonguayL. G.HayesJ. A.LockeB. D. (2017). Effectiveness of routine psychotherapy: Method matters. Psychotherapy Research, 29, 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2017.1395921
37.
McEvoyP. M.NathanP. (2007). Effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy for diagnostically heterogeneous groups: A benchmarking study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 344–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.2.344
38.
McGrathR. J.CummingG. F.BurchardB. L.ZeoliS.EllerbyL. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management. Safer Society Press.
39.
McPhailI. V.HermannC. A.FernaneS.FernandezY. M.NunesK. L.CantorJ. M. (2019). Validity in phallometric testing for sexual interests in children: A meta-analytic review. Assessment, 26, 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117706139
40.
McPhailI. V.OlverM. E.Brouillette-AlarieS.LoomanJ. (2018). Taxometric analysis of the latent structure of pedophilic interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 2223–2240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1225-4
41.
MilnerR. J. (2016). Desistance in men who have previously committed sexual offences: An exploration of the early processes [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of York.
42.
MinamiT.SerlinR. C.WampoldB. E.KircherJ. C.BrownG. J. (2008). Using clinical trials to benchmark effects produced in clinical practice. Quality and Quantity, 42, 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9057-z
43.
MorrisS. B.DeShonR. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7, 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.105
44.
PaolucciE. O.GenuisM. L.ViolatoC. (2001). A meta-analysis of the published research on the effects of child sexual abuse. The Journal of Psychology, 135, 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980109603677
RosenthalR. (1993). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. SAGE.
47.
SchmidtA. F.MokrosA.BanseR. (2013). Is pedophilic sexual preference continuous? A taxometric analysis based on direct and indirect measures. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1146–1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033326
48.
SchulzeR. (2007). Current methods for meta-analysis: Approaches, issues, and developments. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 215, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.215.2.90
49.
SetoM. C. (2018). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.
StephensS.LerouxE.SkillingT.CantorJ. M.SetoM. C. (2017). Taxometric analyses of pedophilia utilizing self-report, behavioral, and sexual arousal indicators. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 1114–1119. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000291
52.
SterneJ. A. C.HernánM. A.ReevesB. C.SavovićJ.BerkmanN. D.ViswanathanM.. . .CarpenterJ. R. (2016). ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. British Medical Journal, 355, Article i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
53.
SterneJ. A. C.HigginsJ. P. T.ElbersR. G.ReevesB. C., & The Development Group for ROBINS-I. (2016). Risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I): Detailed guidance. http://www.riskofbias.info
54.
TurnerD.BrikenP. (2018). Treatment of paraphilic disorders in sexual offenders or men with a risk of sexual offending with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists: An updated systematic review. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 15, 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.11.013
55.
van WieringenK.CribbieR. A. (2014). Evaluating clinical significance: Incorporating robust statistics with normative comparison tests. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12015
56.
WaltonJ. S.HockenK. (2020). Compassion and acceptance as interventions for paraphilic disorders and sexual offending behaivour. In AkermanG.PerkinsD.BartelsR. (Eds.), Assessing and managing problematic sexual interests: A practitioners guide. London: Routledge.
57.
WangC. T.HoltonJ. (2007). Total estimated cost of child abuse and neglect in the United States. Prevent Child Abuse America.
58.
WhitakerW.LeB.HansonR. K.BakerC. K.McMahonP. M.RyanG.. . .RiceD. D. (2008). Risk factors for the perpetration of child sexual abuse: A review and meta-analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 529–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.08.005
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
