Legal and social circumstances now offer the field of juvenile forensic assessment several opportunities to expand its identity, influence, and value to society. These opportunities include (a) conceptualizing an assessment domain called evaluations for developmental sentencing, (b) creating developmental forensic evaluations of emerging adults, and (c) adapting juvenile forensic assessments to the nation’s increasing ethnic and cultural diversity. If successfully attempted, these opportunities could transform juvenile forensic assessment’s identity, reimagining itself as developmental forensic assessment applied to offenders in both juvenile and criminal courts.
AchenbachT.RescorlaL. (2007). Multicultural understanding of child and adolescent psychopathology: Implications for mental health assessment. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
2.
ArnettJ. (2000). Emerging adulthood: Theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
3.
BersaniB. (2014). An examination of first and second generation immigrant offending trajectories. Justice Quarterly, 31, 315-343.
4.
BersaniB.EgglestonE. (2018). Desistance from offending in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 311-334.
5.
BersaniB.NieuwbeertaP.LaubJ. (2009). Predicting trajectories of offending over the life course from a Dutch conviction cohort. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 46, 468-494.
6.
CohenA.BreinerK.SteinbergL.BonnieR.ScottE.Taylor-ThompsonK.CaseyB. (2016). When is an adolescent an adult? Assessing cognitive control in emotional and nonemotional contexts. Psychological Science, 27, 49-62.
7.
ColinsO.BoonmannC.VeenstraJ.van DomburghT.BuffingF.DoreleijersT.VermeirenR. (2013). Mental health problems and recidivism among detained male adolescents from various ethnic origins. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2, 481-490.
8.
Director of Public Prosecutions for Western Australia v. Samson, Citation No. WASC 199, Case No. DSO:5 (2014).
9.
DuellN.SteinbergL.IcenogleG.CheinJ.ChaudaryN.Di GiuntaL.. . . ChangL. (2018). Age patterns in risk taking across the world. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1052-1072.
10.
Ewert v. Canada, 2018 SCC 30, [2018] 2 S.C.R. 165.
11.
Graham v. Florida, 130 S. Ct. 2011 (2010).
12.
GrissoT. (2013). Forensic evaluation of juveniles. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
13.
GrissoT.KavanaughA. (2016). Prospects for developmental evidence in juvenile sentencing based on Miller v. Alabama. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22, 235-249.
14.
HartS. (2016). Culture and violence risk assessment: The case of Ewert v. Canada. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 3, 76-96.
15.
HartS.DouglasK.GuyL. (2016). The structured professional judgment approach to violence risk assessment: Origins, nature, and advances. In CraigL.RettenbergerM. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment and treatment of sexual offending: Volume II (pp. 643-666). New York, NY: Wiley.
16.
HeilbrunK.DeMatteoD.GoldsteinN. (Eds.). (2016). APA handbook of psychology and juvenile justice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17.
HeilbrunK.DeMatteoD.KingC.FiloneS. (2017). Evaluating juvenile transfer and disposition: Law, science, and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
KavanaughA.GrissoT. (in press). Evaluations for sentencing of juveniles in criminal court. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
Kent v. U.S., 383 U.S. 541 (1966).
20.
LevickM.FeiermanJ. (2016). Children in the justice system: The legal framework. In HeilbrunK.DeMatteoD.GoldsteinN. (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology and juvenile justice (pp. 23-43). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21.
LunaB.WrightC. (2016). Adolescent brain development: Implications for the juvenile criminal justice system. In HeilbrunK.DeMatteoD.GoldsteinN. (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology and juvenile justice (pp. 91-116). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22.
Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012).
23.
MonahanJ.SkeemJ.LowenkampC. (2017). Age, risk assessment, and sanctioning: Overestimating the old, underestimating the young. Law and Human Behavior, 41, 191-201.
24.
Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 S. Ct. 718 (2016).
25.
National Research Council of the National Academies. (2013). Reforming juvenile justice: A developmental approach. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
PonterottoJ.GretchenD.ChauhanR. (2001). Cultural identity and multicultural assessment: Quantitative and qualitative tests for the clinician. In SuzukiL.PonterottoJ. (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological, and educational applications (2nd ed., pp. 67-100). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
Roper v. Simmons, 125 S. Ct. 1183 (2005).
29.
RussellM.OdgersC. (2016). Desistance and life-course persistence: Findings from longitudinal studies using group-based trajectory modeling of antisocial behavior. In HeilbrunK.DeMatteoD.GoldsteinN. (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology and juvenile justice (pp. 159-175). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30.
SalekinR. (2004). The Risk-Sophistication-Treatment Inventory: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
31.
SalekinR. (2015). Forensic evaluation and treatment of juveniles: Innovation and best practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32.
SalekinR.MacDougallE.HarrisonN. (2016). Developmental maturity and sophistication-maturity: Learning more about its purpose and assessment. In HeilbrunK.DeMatteoD.GoldsteinN. (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology and juvenile justice (pp. 405-424). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33.
SalekinR.YffR.NeumannC.LeisticoA.ZalotA. (2002). Juvenile transfer to adult courts: A look at the prototypes for dangerousness, sophistication-maturity, and amenability to treatment through a legal lens. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8, 373-410.
ScottE. (2013). “Children are different”: Constitutional values and justice policy. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 1, 71-105.
36.
ScottE.BonnieR.SteinbergL. (2016). Young adulthood as a transitional legal category: Science, social change and justice policy. Fordham Law Review, 85, 641-666.
37.
ScottE.GrissoT.LevickM.SteinbergL. (2016). Juvenile sentencing reform in a constitutional framework. Temple Law Review, 88, 675-716.
38.
ScottE.SteinbergL. (2008). Rethinking juvenile justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
Sharp v. State, 16 N.E.3d 470 (Ind. App. Ct. 2014).
40.
ShulmanE.SteinbergL. (2016). Human development and juvenile justice. In HeilbrunK.DeMatteoD.GoldsteinN. (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology and juvenile justice (pp. 69-90). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
41.
SloboginC. (2016). Preventive justice for adolescents. In HeilbrunK.DeMatteoD.GoldsteinN. (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology and juvenile justice (pp. 45-65). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42.
State v. O’Dell, 358 P. 3d 359 (Wash. 2015).
43.
SteinbergL.IcenogleG.SchulmanE.BreinerK.CheinJ.BacchiniD.. . . TakashH. (2017). Around the world, adolescence is a time of heightened sensation seeking and immature self-regulation. Developmental Science, 31, 1-13.
44.
SuzukiL.PonterottoJ. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological, and educational applications (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
45.
VeenV.StevensG.DoreleijersT.van der EndeJ.VolleberghW. (2010). Ethnic differences in mental health among incarcerated youths: Do Moroccan immigrant boys show less psychopathology than native Dutch boys?European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 19, 431-440.
46.
VincentG.DrawbridgeD.DavisM. (2019). The validity of risk assessment instruments for transition-age youth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87, 171-183.
47.
WeissR.RosenfeldB. (2012). Navigating cross-cultural issues in forensic assessment: Recommendations for practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43, 234-240.
