Criminal Justice Debt During the Prisoner Reintegration Process: Who Has It and How Much?

Abstract

Much recent, national attention has centered on financial sanctions and associated debt burdens related to criminal justice. Scholars and practitioners alike have argued that financial debt among the incarcerated, in particular, exacerbates a transition home already defined by difficulties. This article takes a step back and assesses who is at risk of these adverse consequences in reentry by examining the extent of debt burdens that resulted from financial sanctions, its sources, and the individual-level factors that are associated with owing criminal justice debt. Relying on the Returning Home data (N = 740), results from descriptive analyses, logistic regression, and negative binomial models show that a large proportion of respondents owed debts and that debt was strongly linked with being mandated to community supervision. In addition, debt amount was predicted by employment, income, and race. Policy implications in the realm of financial sanctioning by courts and correctional agencies are discussed.

Keywords

financial sanctions legal financial obligations community supervision collateral consequences criminal justice debt probation parole

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agnew

(1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47-88. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x

Albin-Lackey

(2014). Profiting from probation: America’s “offender-funded” probation industry. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/report/2014/02/05/profiting-probation/americas-offender-funded-probation-industry

American Civil Liberties Union. (2010). In for a penny: The rise of America’s new debtor’s prisons. Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/report/penny-rise-americas-new-debtors-prisons

Bannon

Nagrecha

Diller

(2010). Criminal justice debt: A barrier to reentry. Retrieved from https://www.brennancenter.org/publication/criminal-justice-debt-barrier-reentry

Beckett

Harris

(2011). On cash and conviction. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 509-537. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00726.x

Bucklen

Zajac

(2009). But some of them don’t come back (to prison!): Resource deprivation and thinking errors as determinants of parole success and failure. The Prison Journal, 89, 239-264. doi:10.1177/0032885509339504

Clear

T. R.

(2011). A private-sector, incentives-based model for justice reinvestment. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 585-608.

Dewan

(2015, October 1). Private probation company accused of abuses in Tennessee. The New York Times, p. A15.

Eitle

Alessio

S. J. D.

Stolzenberg

(2014). Racial threat and social control: A test of the political, economic, and threat of Black crime hypotheses. Social Forces, 81, 557-576. doi:10.1353/sof.2003.0007

10.

Evans

D. N.

(2014). The debt penalty: Exposing the financial barriers to offender reintegration. Retrieved from https://jjrec.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/debtpenalty.pdf

11.

Gordon

M. A.

Glaser

(1991). The use and effects of financial penalties in municipal courts. Criminology, 29, 651-676. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01083.x

12.

Grattet

Lin

(2016). Supervision intensity and parole outcomes: A competing risks approach to criminal and technical parole violations. Justice Quarterly, 33, 565-583. doi:10.1080/07418825.2014.932001

13.

Greene

(1990). The Staten Island day fines experiment. Retrieved from https://www.vera.org/publications/the-staten-island-day-fines-experiment

14.

Harding

D. J.

(2003). Counterfactual models of neighborhood effects: The effect of neighborhood poverty on dropping out and teenage pregnancy. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 676-719. doi:10.1086/379217

15.

Harris

(2016). A pound of flesh: Monetary sanctions as a permanent punishment for poor people. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

16.

Harris

Evans

Beckett

(2010). Drawing blood from stones: Legal debt and social inequality in the contemporary United States. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 1753-1799. doi:10.1086/651463

17.

Harris

Evans

Beckett

(2011). Courtesy stigma and monetary sanctions: Toward a socio-cultural theory of punishment. American Sociological Review, 76, 234-264. doi:10.1177/0003122411400054

18.

Hillsman

S. T.

(1990). Fines and day fines. Crime and Justice, 12, 49-98.

19.

Hyatt

J. M.

Barnes

G. C.

(2017). An experimental evaluation of the impact of intensive supervision on the recidivism of high-risk probationers. Crime & Delinquency, 63, 3-38. doi:10.1177/0011128714555757

20.

Iratzoqui

Metcalfe

(2017). Set up for failure? Examining the influence of monetary sanctions on probation success. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28, 370-393. doi:10.1177/0887403415586595

21.

Katzenstein

M. F.

Nagrecha

(2011). A new punishment regime. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 555-568. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00731.x

22.

Kutateladze

B. L.

Andiloro

N. R.

Johnson

B. D.

Spohn

C. C.

(2014). Cumulative disadvantage: Examining racial and ethnic disparity in prosecution and sentencing. Criminology, 52, 514-551. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12047

23.

Link

N. W.

Roman

C. G.

(2017). Longitudinal associations among child support debt, employment, and recidivism after prison. The Sociological Quarterly, 58, 140-160. doi:10.1080/00380253.2016.1246892

24.

Markowitz

(2015, September). Chain gang 2.0: If you can’t afford this GPS ankle bracelet, you get thrown in jail. International Business Times. Retrieved from http://www.ibtimes.com/chain-gang-20-if-you-cant-afford-gps-ankle-bracelet-you-get-thrown-jail-2065283

25.

Martin

K. D.

Sykes

B. L.

Shannon

Edwards

Harris

(2018). Monetary sanctions: Legal financial obligations in U.S. systems of justice. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 471-495.

26.

Martire

Sunjic

Topp

Indig

(2011). Financial sanctions and the justice system: Fine debts among New South Wales prisoners with a history of problematic substance use. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 44, 258-271. doi:10.1177/0004865811405258

27.

Mauer

Chesney-Lind

(2003). Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass incarceration. New York, NY: The New Press.

28.

Medina

J. C.

(2017). Making the decision to extend probation supervision at a local agency. Crime & Delinquency, 63, 1712-1730. doi:10.1177/0011128716674702

29.

Mowen

T. J.

Visher

C. A.

(2013). Drug use and crime after incarceration: The role of family support and family conflict. Justice Quarterly, 32, 337-359. doi:10.1080/07418825.2013.771207

30.

Nagin

D. S.

(2008). Thoughts on the broader implications of the “miracle of the cells.” Criminology & Public Policy, 7, 37-42. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2008.00488.x

31.

Nagrecha

Katzenstein

M. F.

Davis

(2015). When all else fails, fining the family. Retrieved from http://www.communityalternatives.org/pdf/Criminal-Justice-Debt.pdf

32.

Olson

D. E.

Ramker

G. F.

(2001). Crime does not pay, but criminals may: Factors influencing the imposition and collection of probation fees. Justice System Journal, 22, 29-46.

33.

Petersilia

(2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

34.

Peterson

R. D.

Krivo

L. J.

(2010). Divergent social worlds: Neighborhood crime and the racial-spatial divide. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

35.

Piquero

A. R.

Jennings

W. G.

(2017). Justice system-imposed financial penalties increase the likelihood of recidivism in a sample of adolescent offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 15, 325-340. doi:10.1177/1541204016669213

36.

Pleggenkuhle

(2018). The financial cost of a criminal conviction: Context and consequences. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45, 121-145. doi:10.1177/0093854817734278

37.

Pogrebin

West-Smith

Walker

Unnithan

N. P.

(2014). Employment isn’t enough: Financial obstacles experienced by ex-prisoners during the reentry process. Criminal Justice Review, 39, 394-410. doi:10.1177/0734016814540303

38.

Reitz

K. R.

(2015). Economic rehabilitation of offenders: Recommendations of the Model Penal Code (Second). Minnesota Law Review, 99, 1735-1778.

39.

Reynolds

Cowherd

Barbee

Fabelo

Wood

Yoon

(2009). A framework to improve how fines, fees, restitution, and child support are assessed and collected from people convicted of crimes. Retrieved from https://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/2009-CSG-TXOCA-report.pdf

40.

Roman

C. G.

Link

N. W.

(2017). Community reintegration among prisoners with child support obligations: An examination of debt, needs, and service receipt. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28, 896-917. doi:10.1177/0887403415611460

41.

Ruback

R. B.

Bergstrom

(2006). Economic sanctions in criminal justice purposes, effects, and implications. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 242-273. doi:10.1177/0093854805284414

42.

Ruback

R. B.

Clark

V. A.

(2011). Economic sanctions in Pennsylvania: Complex and inconsistent. Duquesne Law Review, 49, 751-785.

43.

Ruback

R. B.

Shaffer

J. N.

Logue

M. A.

(2004). The imposition and effects of restitution in four Pennsylvania counties: Effects of size of county and specialized collection units. Crime & Delinquency, 50, 168-188.

44.

Ruhland

E. L.

Robey

J. P.

Corbett

R. P.

Reitz

K. R.

(2017). Exploring supervision fees in four probation jurisdictions in Texas. Retrieved from https://robinainstitute.umn.edu/publications/new-report-exploring-supervision-fees-four-jurisdictions-texas

45.

Rydberg

Carkin

D. M.

(2014). Utilizing alternate models for analyzing count outcomes. Crime and Delinquency, 63, 61-76. doi:10.1177/0011128716678848

46.

Sampson

R. J.

Laub

J. H.

(1995). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

47.

Schiraldi

Jacobson

(2014). Could less be more when it comes to probation supervision? American City & County. Retrieved from http://americancityandcounty.com/blog/could-less-be-more-when-it-comes-probation-supervision

48.

Shapiro

(2014, May). As court fees rise, the poor are paying the price. National Public Radio. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2014/05/19/312158516/increasing-court-fees-punish-the-poor

49.

Sneed

(2015, February 6). Private misdemeanor probation industry faces new scrutiny. U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved from https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/02/06/private-misdemeanor-probation-industry-faces-new-scrutiny

50.

Tonry

M. H.

(1996). Sentencing matters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

51.

Travis

J. C.

(2005). But they all come back: Facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

52.

Turner

Petersilia

(1996). Day fines in four U.S. institutions. Retrieved from https://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/1996-RAND-day-fines-4-BJA-pilot-sites.pdf

53.

U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. (2015). Investigation of the Ferguson police department. Washington, DC: Author.

54.

Vigorita

M. S.

(2002). Fining practices in felony courts: An analysis of offender, offense and systemic factors. Corrections Compendium, 27(11), 1-5.

55.

Visher

C. A.

Debus-Sherrill

Yahner

(2011). Employment after prison: A longitudinal study of former prisoners. Justice Quarterly, 28, 698-718. doi:10.1080/07418825.2010.535553

56.

Visher

C. A.

Travis

(2003). Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 89-113. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.095931

57.

Visher

C. A.

Travis

(2011). Life on the outside: Returning home after incarceration. The Prison Journal, 91, 102S-119S. doi:10.1177/0032885511415228

58.

Wallace

(2011). A test of the routine activities and neighborhood attachment explanations for bias in disorder perceptions. Crime & Delinquency, 61, 587-609. doi:10.1177/0011128711426538

59.

Western

Braga

Davis

Sirois

(2015). Stress and hardship after prison. American Journal of Sociology, 120, 1512-1547. doi:10.1086/681301

60.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(2007). Inverse probability weighted estimation for general missing data problems. Journal of Econometrics, 141, 1281-1301. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.02.002