ClevelandH. H.SchlomerG. L.VandenberghD. J.WiebeR. P. (2016). Gene × Intervention Designs: A promising step toward understanding etiology and building better preventive interventions. Criminology & Public Policy, 15, 711-720.
2.
CooperJ. A.WalshA.EllisL. (2010). Is criminology moving toward a paradigm shift? Evidence from a survey of the American Society of Criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21, 332-347.
3.
GajosJ. M.BeaverK. M.GertzM.BrattonJ. (2014). Public opinion of genetic and neuropsychological contributors to criminal involvement. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 25, 368-385.
4.
GajosJ. M.FaganA. A.BeaverK. M. (2016). Use of genetically informed evidence-based prevention science to understand and prevent crime and related behavioral disorders. Criminology & Public Policy, 15, 683-701.
5.
PrattT. C.TuranovicJ. J.CullenF. T. (2016). Revisiting the criminological consequences of exposure to fetal testosterone: A meta-analysis of the 2D:4D ratio. Criminology, 54, 587-620.
6.
RocqueM.WelshB. C.RaineA. (2012). Biosocial criminology and modern crime prevention. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 306-312.
7.
SteinbergL.CauffmanE.WoolardJ.GrahamS.BanichM. (2009). Are adolescents less mature than adults? Minors’ access to abortion, the juvenile death penalty, and the alleged APA “flip-flop.”American Psychologist, 64, 583-594.
8.
VaughnM. G. (2016). Policy implications of biosocial criminology. Criminology & Public Policy, 15, 703-710.
