Ex-offenders face barriers to community reintegration including negative attitudes held by members of the public. This meta-analysis summarizes the extant research on the correlates of public attitudes toward ex-offenders—namely, public, ex-offender, and community characteristics—and the moderating effects of sexual offense history. A systematic search of four databases (PsycINFO, Web of Science, National Criminal Justice Reference Service [NCJRS], and ProQuest Dissertation & Theses) identified 19 records, consisting of 9,355 participants. Results revealed small associations between correlate variables and attitudes, suggesting that people are more similar than different in their attitudes toward ex-offenders. Indeed, only political ideology, interpersonal contact, and sexual offense history emerged as significant correlates. Moderation analyses revealed differences in public attitudes toward ex-offenders based upon the year a record was produced. Findings reveal the need for additional research examining moderators of public attitudes toward ex-offenders and suggest that interventions should explore ways to incorporate interpersonal contact and reduce stigma related to criminal histories.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
ArthurW.BennettW.HuffcuttA. I. (2001). Conducting meta-analysis using SAS. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
*Atkin-PlunkC. A.ArmstrongG. S. (2013). Does the concentration of parolees in a community impact employer attitudes toward the hiring of ex-offenders?Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24, 71-93. doi:10.1177/0887403411428005
5.
BrooksL. E.VisherC. A.NaserR. L. (2006). Community residents’ perceptions of prisoner reentry in selected Cleveland neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Center, Urban Institute.
6.
*BrownS. (1999). Public attitudes toward the treatment of sex offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 239-252. doi:10.1348/135532599167879
7.
BrownS. (2009). Attitudes towards sexual offenders and their rehabilitation: A special case? In WoodJ. L.GannonT. A. (Eds.), Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice (pp. 187-213). Portland, OR: Willan.
8.
*BurchfieldK. B. (2012). Assessing community residents’ perceptions of local registered sex offenders: Results from a pilot survey. Deviant Behavior, 33, 241-259. doi:10.1080/01639625.2011.573396
9.
CarsonE. A.SabolW. J. (2012). Prisoners in 2011. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p11.pdf
10.
ClearT. R.RoseD. R.RyderJ. A. (2001). Incarceration and the community: The problem of removing and returning offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 335-351. doi:10.1177/0011128701047003003
11.
ClementS.van NieuwenhuizenA.KassamA.FlachC.LazarusA.de CastroM.. . . ThronicroftG. (2012). Filmed v. live social contact interventions to reduce stigma: Randomized controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 201, 57-64. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.111.093120
12.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
13.
*ComartinE. B.KernsmithP. D.KernsmithR. M. (2009). Sanctions for sex offenders: Fear and public policy. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48, 605-619. doi:10.1080/10509670903196066
14.
ContiN.MorrisonL.PantaleoK. (2013). All the wiser: Dialogic space, destigmatization, and teacher-activist recruitment. The Prison Journal, 93, 163-188. doi:10.1177/0032885512472654
15.
CorriganP. W.MorrisS. B.MichaelsP. J.RafaczJ. D.RüschN. (2012). Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: A meta-analysis of outcome studies. Psychiatric Services, 63, 963-973. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.005292011
16.
*Dawson EdwardsB. C. (2007). Determinants of college students’ opinions towards felon voting rights: An exploratory study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
17.
DovidioJ. F.GlickP.RudmanL. A. (2005). Introduction: Reflecting on the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport. In DovidioJ. F.GlickP.RudmanL. A. (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 1-16). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
18.
DreilingK. L. (2011). Knowledge and opinion of sex offenders and sex offender policy: Do sources of information matter? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). South Dakota State University, Brookings.
19.
Federal Prisoner Reentry Initiative of 2009, 42 U.S.C. § 17541.
20.
*GibsonC.RobersonD.DanielA. (2009). African American women on the possibilities of a relationship with an ex-offender. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 328-332. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.06.009
21.
GideonL.LovelandN. (2011). Public attitudes toward rehabilitation and reintegration. In GideonL.SungH.-E. (Eds.), Rethinking corrections: Rehabilitation, reentry, and reintegration (pp. 19-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
GraffamJ.ShinkfieldA.LavelleB.McPhersonW. (2004). Variables affecting successful reintegration as perceived by offenders and professionals. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 40, 147-171. doi:10.1300/J076v40n01_08
24.
GrasmickH. G.McGillA. L. (1994). Religion, attribution style, and punitiveness toward juvenile offenders. Criminology, 32, 23-46. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01145.x
25.
HardcastleL.BartholomewT.GraffamJ. (2011). Legislative and community support for offender reintegration in Victoria. Deakin Law Review, 16, 111-132.
26.
*HirschfieldP. J.PiqueroA. R. (2010). Normalization and legitimation: Modeling stigmatizing attitudes toward ex-offenders. Criminology, 48, 27-55. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00179.x
27.
HulseyL. F. (1991). Attitudes of employers with respect to hiring released prisoners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, College Station.
28.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2000). Fixed effects vs. random effects meta-analysis models: Implications for cumulative research knowledge. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 275-292. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00156
29.
JacobsD.CarmichaelJ. T. (2002). The political sociology of the death penalty: A pooled time-series analysis. American Sociological Review, 67, 109-131. doi:10.2307/3088936
KlebanH.JeglicE. (2012). Dispelling the myths: Can psychoeducation change public attitudes towards sex offenders?Journal of Sexual Aggression, 18, 179-193. doi:10.1080/13552600.2011.552795
32.
LawsD. R. (2000). Sexual offending as a public health problem: A North American perspective. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 5, 30-44. doi:10.1080/13552600008413294
33.
LeBelT. P. (2008). Perceptions of and responses to stigma. Sociology Compass, 2, 409-432. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00081.x
34.
LeBelT. P. (2012). If one doesn’t get you another one will: Formerly incarcerated persons’ perceptions of discrimination. The Prison Journal, 92, 63-87. doi:10.1177/0032885511429243
*LevensonJ. S.BrannonY. N.FortneyT.BakerJ. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7, 137-161. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x
37.
LeverentzA. (2011). Neighborhood context of attitudes toward crime and reentry. Punishment & Society, 13, 64-92. doi:10.1177/1462474510385629
38.
LiberatiA.AltmanD. G.TetzlaffJ.MulrowC.GøtzscheP. C.IoannidisJ. P. A.. . . MoherD. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. The British Medical Journal, 339. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2700
39.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
40.
*LockeC. R. (2010). Public attitudes toward mental illness: An experimental design examining the media’s impact of crime on stigma (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus.
41.
MackeyD. A.CourtrightK. E. (2000). Assessing punitiveness among college students: A comparison of criminal justice majors with other majors. Justice Professional, 12, 423-441. doi:10.1080/1478601X.2000.9959561
42.
*ManciniC.ShieldsR. T.MearsD. P.BeaverK. M. (2010). Sex offender residence restriction laws: Parental perceptions and public policy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1022-1030. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.07.004
43.
*ManzaJ.BrooksC.UggenC. (2004). Public attitudes toward felon disenfranchisement in the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 275-286. doi:10.1093/poq/nfh015
44.
*MartinezM. S. (2011). Employer perceptions about hiring released prisoners with a criminal history (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Capella University, Minneapolis, MN.
45.
MaruschakL. M.ParksE. (2012). Probation and parole in the United States, 2011. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/ppus11.pdf
46.
MasonC.AllamR.BrannickM. T. (2007). How to meta-analyze coefficient-of-stability estimates: Some recommendations based on Monte Carlo studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 765-783. doi:10.1177/0013164407301532
47.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G.The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1006-1012. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
48.
PagerD. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 937-975. doi:10.1086/374403
49.
*PagerD.QuillianL. (2005). Walking the talk? What employers say versus what they do. American Sociological Review, 70, 355-380. doi:10.1177/000312240507000301
50.
ParkR. E.BurgessE. W. (1921). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/28496/28496-
51.
*ParkS. (2009). College students’ attitudes toward prisoners and prisoner reentry (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
52.
*PerkinsD. V.RainesJ. A.TschoppM. K.WarnerT. C. (2009). Gainful employment reduces stigma toward people recovering from schizophrenia. Community Mental Health Journal, 45, 158-162. doi:10.1007/s10597-008-9158-3
53.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
54.
PhelanJ. C.LinkB. G.DovidioJ. F. (2008). Stigma and prejudice: One animal or two?Social Science & Medicine, 67, 358-367. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.022
55.
*PiqueroA. R.PiqueroN. L.GertzM.BakerT.BattonJ.BarnesJ. C. (2011). Race, punishment, and the Michael Vick experience. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 535-551. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00781.x
56.
PogorzelskiW.WolffN.PanK. Y.BlitzC. L. (2005). Behavioral health problems, ex-offender reentry policies, and the Second Chance Act. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1718-1724. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.065805
57.
PompaL. (2013). One brick at a time: The power and possibility of dialogue across the prison wall. The Prison Journal, 93, 127-134.
58.
*RogersP.HirstL.DaviesM. (2011). An investigation into the effect of respondent gender, victim age, and perpetrator treatment on public attitudes towards sex offenders, sex offender treatment, and sex offender rehabilitation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50, 511-530. doi:10.1080/10509674.2011.602472
59.
SchmidtF. L.HunterJ. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
60.
SchnittkerJ.BacakV. (2013). A mark of disgrace or a badge of honor?: Subjective status among former inmates. Social Problems, 60, 234-254. doi:10.1525/sp.2013.60.2.234
61.
SchulzeR. (2004). Meta-analysis: A comparison of approaches. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.
62.
Second Chance Act. (2007). Community Safety through Recidivism Prevention, 42 U.S.C. § 17501.
63.
TewksburyR.LeesM. (2006). Perceptions of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences and community experiences. Sociological Spectrum, 26, 309-334. doi:10.1080/02732170500524246
64.
UggenC. (2000). Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: A duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. American Sociological Review, 65, 529-546. doi:10.2307/2657381
VargheseF. P.HardinE. E.BauerR. L.MorganR. D. (2010). Attitudes toward hiring offenders: The roles of criminal history, job qualifications, and race. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 769-782. doi:10.1177/0306624X09344960
67.
VikiG. T.FullertonI.RaggettH.TaitF.WiltshireS. (2012). The role of dehumanization in attitudes toward the social exclusion and rehabilitation of sex offenders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 2349-2367. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00944.x
68.
VisherC. A.DebusS.YahnerJ. (2008). Employment after prison: A longitudinal study of releases in three states. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Center, Urban Institute.
69.
WakefieldS.UggenC. (2010). Incarceration and stratification. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 387-406. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102551
70.
WeekesJ. R.PelletierG.BeaudetteD. (1995). Correctional officers: How do they perceive sex offenders?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 39, 55-61. doi:10.1177/0306624X9503900107
71.
WillisG. M.LevensonJ. S.WardT. (2010). Desistance and attitudes towards sex offenders: Facilitation or hindrance?Journal of Family Violence, 25, 545-556. doi:10.1007/s10896-010-9314-8
72.
*WillisG. M.MalinenS.JohnstonL. (2013). Demographic differences in public attitudes towards sex offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20, 230-247. doi:10.1080/13218719.2012.658206
