In this article an argument is developed that criminologists’ focus on individuals’ levels of self-control has caused us to miss another key component within this theoretical tradition: within-individual situational variability in self-control. Accordingly, in the present study, self-control variability is treated as an important theoretical construct that should explain criminal behavior independent of one’s level of self-control. This proposition is tested empirically on a sample of young adults, using measures of both self-control and situational self-control variability in a series of multivariate regression models. The results demonstrate that both self-control and self-control variability exert significant and independent effects on criminal behavior. These results reveal support for a reconceptualized model of self-control that incorporates both static and dynamic dimensions.
AhernJ.GaleaS.HubbardA.KarpatiA. (2008). Population vulnerabilities and capacities related to health: A test of a model. Social Science & Medicine, 66, 691-703.
2.
AkersR. L. (1991). Self-control as a general theory of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 7, 201-211.
3.
AndersonE. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
4.
AntonaccioO.TittleC. R. (2008). Morality, self-control, and crime. Criminology, 46, 479-510.
5.
ArielyD.LoewensteinG. (2006). The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 87-98.
6.
ArneklevB. J.CochranJ. K.GaineyR. R. (1998). Testing Gottfredson and Hirschi’s “low self-control” stability hypothesis: An exploratory study. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 107-127.
7.
ArneklevB. J.GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J. (1993). Low self-control and imprudent behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 225-247.
8.
BaumeisterR. F. (2002). Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 670-676.
9.
BaumeisterR. F.ExlineJ. J. (1999). Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle. Journal of Personality, 67, 1165-1194.
10.
BaumeisterR. F.ExlineJ. J. (2000). Self-control, morality, and human strength. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 19, 29-42.
11.
BaumeisterR. F.TierneyJ. (2011). Willpower: Rediscovering the greatest human strength. New York, NY: Penguin.
12.
BeaverK. M.ShuttJ. E.BoutwellB. B.RatchfordM.RobertsK.BarnesJ. C. (2009). Genetic and environmental influences on levels of self-control and delinquent peer affiliation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 41-60.
13.
BeaverK. M.WrightJ. P. (2007). Stability of low self-control from Kindergarten through first grade. Journal of Crime & Justice, 30, 63-86.
14.
BelsleyD. A.KuhE.WelschR. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics. New York, NY: Wiley.
15.
BergM. T.StewartE. A.SchreckC. J.SimonsR. L. (2012). The victim-offender overlap in context: Examining the role of neighborhood street culture. Criminology, 50, 359-390.
16.
BurtC. H.SimonsR. L.SimonsL. G. (2006). A longitudinal test of the effects of parenting and the stability of self-control: Negative evidence for the general theory of crime. Criminology, 44, 353-396.
17.
CochranJ. K.AleskaV.ChamlinM. B. (2006). Self restraint: A study on the capacity and desire for self-control. Western Criminology Review, 7(3), 27-40.
18.
EvansT. D.CullenF. T.BurtonV. S.DunawayR. G.BensonM. L. (1997). The social consequences of self-control: Testing the general theory of crime. Criminology, 35, 475-501.
19.
FoxJ. (1994). Linear statistical models and related methods. New York, NY: Wiley.
20.
FranklinC. A. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-control and alcohol-induced sexual victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 263-285.
21.
FranklinC. A.BouffardL. A.PrattT. C. (2012). Sexual assault on the college campus: Fraternity affiliation, male peer support, and low self-control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1457-1480.
22.
GaleaS.AhernJ.KarpatiA. (2005). A model of underlying socioeconomic vulnerability in human populations: Evidence from variability in population health and implications for public health. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 2417-2430.
23.
GeisG. (2000). On the absence of self-control as the basis for a general theory of crime: A critique. Theoretical Criminology, 4, 35-53.
24.
Giner-SorollaR. (2001). Guilty pleasure and grim necessities: Affective attitudes in dilemmas of self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 206-221.
25.
GmelG. (2001). Imputation of missing values in the case of multiple item instrument measuring alcohol consumption. Statistics in Medicine, 20, 2369-2381.
26.
GottfredsonM. R. (2011). Sanctions, situations, and agency in control theories of crime. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 128-143.
27.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
28.
GouldS. J. (1988). Trends as changes in variance: A new slant on progress and directionality in evolution. Journal of Paleontology, 62, 319-329.
29.
GouldS. J. (1996). Full house: The spread of excellence from Plato to Darwin. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
30.
GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J.ArneklevB. K. (1993). Testing the core implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
31.
GropelP.BaumeisterR. F.BeckmanJ. (2014). Action versus state orientation and self-control performance after depletion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 476-487.
32.
HaganJ.McCarthyB. (1997). Mean streets: Youth crime and homelessness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
HaggerM. S.WoodC.StiffC.ChatzisarantisN. L. D. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 495-525.
34.
HanushekE. A.JacksonJ. E. (1977). Statistical methods for social scientists. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
35.
HayC.ForrestW. (2006). The development of self-control: Examining self-control theory’s stability thesis. Criminology, 44, 739-774.
36.
HigginsG. E. (2007). Examining the original Grasmick scale: A Rasch model approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 157-178.
37.
HirschiT. (2004). Self-control and crime. In BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. C. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and application (pp. 537-552). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
38.
HirschiT.GottfredsonM. R. (1993). Commentary: Testing the general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 20, 47-54.
39.
HirschiT.GottfredsonM. R. (1994). The generality of deviance. In HirschiT.GottfredsonM. R. (Eds.), The generality of deviance (pp. 23-47). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
40.
HirschiT.GottfredsonM. R. (1995). Control theory and the life-course perspective. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 4, 131-142.
41.
HirschiT.GottfredsonM. R. (2001). Self-control theory. In PaternosterR.BachmanR. (Eds.), Explaining criminals and crime (pp. 81-96). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
42.
HoltfreterK.ReisigM. D.PiqueroN. L.PiqueroA. R. (2010). Low self-control and fraud: Offending, victimization, and their overlap. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 188-203.
43.
KaneR. J. (2011). The ecology of unhealthy places: Violence, birthweight, and the importance of territoriality in structurally disadvantaged communities. Social Science & Medicine, 73, 1585-1592.
44.
LaubJ. H.SampsonR. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
LoughranT. A.PaternosterR.PiqueroA. R.PogarskyG. (2011). On ambiguity in perceptions of sanction risk: Implications for criminal decision making and deterrence. Criminology, 49, 1029-1061.
46.
LynamD. R.CaspiA.MoffittT. E.WikstromP. O.LoeberR.NovakS. (2000). The interaction between impulsivity and neighborhood context on offending: The effects of impulsivity are stronger in poorer neighborhoods. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 563-574.
47.
MarcusB. (2003). An empirical examination of the construct validity of two alternative self-control measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 674-706.
48.
MareninO.ReisigM. D. (1995). A general theory of crime and patterns of crime in Nigeria: An exploration of methodological assumptions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 501-518.
49.
McGloinJ. M.PrattT. C.MaahsJ. (2004). Re-thinking the IQ-delinquency relationship: A longitudinal analysis of multiple theoretical models. Justice Quarterly, 21, 601-631.
50.
McGloinJ. M.ShermerL. O. (2009). Self-control and deviant peer network structure. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 46, 35-72.
51.
MearsD. P.CochranJ. C.BeaverK. M. (2013). Self-control theory and nonlinear effects on offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29, 447-476.
52.
MeldrumR. C.YoungJ. T. N.WeermanF. M. (2009). Reconsidering the effect of self-control and delinquent peers: Implications of measurement for theoretical significance. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 46, 353-376.
53.
MoffittT. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
54.
MuravinM.PogarskyG.ShmueliD. (2006). Self-control depletion and the general theory of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 263-277.
55.
NaC.PaternosterR. (2012). Can self-control change substantially over time? Rethinking the relationship between self- and social control. Criminology, 50, 427-462.
56.
PayneB. K.ChappellA. T. (2008). Using student samples in criminological research. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 19, 175-192.
57.
PerroneD.SullivanC.PrattT. C.MargaryanS. (2004). Parental efficacy, self-control, and delinquent behavior: A test of a general theory of crime on a nationally-representative sample. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 298-312.
58.
PiqueroA. R.BouffardJ. A. (2007). Something old, something new: A preliminary investigation of Hirschi’s redefined self-control. Justice Quarterly, 24, 1-27.
59.
PiqueroA. R.JenningsW. G.FarringtonD. P. (2010). On the malleability of self-control: Theoretical and policy implications regarding a general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly, 27, 803-834.
60.
PiqueroA. R.MacIntoshR.HickmanM. (2000). Does self-control affect survey response? Applying exploratory, confirmatory, and item response theory analysis to Grasmick et al.’s self-control scale. Criminology, 38, 897-929.
61.
PiqueroN. L.SchoepferA.LangtonL. (2010). Completely out of control or the desire to be in complete control? How low self-control and the desire for control related to corporate offending. Crime & Delinquency, 56, 627-647.
62.
PrattT. C. (2009). Reconsidering Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: Linking the micro- and macro-level sources of self-control and criminal behavior over the life course. In SavageJ. (Ed.), The development of persistent criminality (pp. 361-373). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
63.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931-964.
64.
PrattT. C.TuranovicJ. J.FoxK. A.WrightK. A. (2014). Self-control and victimization: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 52, 87-116.
65.
PrattT. C.TurnerM. G.PiqueroA. R. (2004). Parental socialization and community context: A longitudinal analysis of the structural sources of low self-control. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 41, 219-243.
66.
ReisigM. D.PrattT. C. (2011). Low self-control and imprudent behavior revisited. Deviant Behavior, 32, 589-625.
67.
ReisigM. D.PrattT. C.BeaverK. M. (2009, March). Low self-control predicts socially-inappropriate behaviors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Boston, MA.
68.
ReisigM. D.PrattT. C.HoltfreterK. (2009, October). Measuring low self-control in criminological research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the European Society of Criminology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
69.
ReisigM. D.WolfeS. E.HoltfreterK. (2011). Legal cynicism, legitimacy, and criminal offending: The nonconfounding effect of low self-control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1265-1279.
70.
ReisigM. D.WolfeS. E.PrattT. C. (2012). Low self-control and the religiosity-crime relationship. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1172-1191.
71.
RobinsonM. D.SchmeichelB. J.InzlichtM. (2010). A cognitive control perspective of self-control strength and its depletion. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 189-200.
72.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73.
SimpsonS. S.PiqueroN. L. (2002). Low self-control, organizational theory, and corporate crime. Law & Society Review, 36, 509-547.
74.
StewartE. A.SchreckC. J.SimonsR. L. (2006). I ain’t gonna let no one disrespect me: Does the code of the street reduce or increase violent victimization among African-American adolescents?Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 43, 427-458.
75.
TangneyJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.BooneA. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271-324.
76.
TittleC. R. (1991). A general theory of crime: A book review. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 1609-1611.
77.
TittleC. R.WardD. A.GrasmickH. G. (2003). Self-control and crime/deviance: Cognitive vs. behavioral measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 333-365.
78.
TittleC. R.WardD. A.GrasmickH. G. (2004). Capacity for self-control and individuals’ interest in exercising self-control. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20, 143-172.
79.
TuranovicJ. J.PrattT. C. (2013). The consequences of maladaptive coping: Integrating general strain and self-control theories to specify a causal pathway between victimization and offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29, 321-345.
80.
TuranovicJ. J.PrattT. C. (2014). “Can’t stop, won’t stop”: Self-control, risky lifestyles, and repeat victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 29-56.
81.
TuranovicJ. J.ReisigM. D.PrattT. C. (2014). Risky lifestyles, low self-control, and violent victimization across gendered pathways to crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10940-0149230-9.
82.
TurnerM. G.PiqueroA. R. (2002). The stability of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 457-471.
83.
UzielL.BaumeisterR. F. (2012). The effect of public social context on self-control depletion for neuroticism and restoration for impression management. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 384-396.
84.
VazsonyiA. T.BellistonL. M. (2007). The family → low self-control → deviance: A cross-cultural and cross-national test of self-control theory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 505-530.
85.
VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F.SchmeichelB. J. (2012). Motivation, personal beliefs, and limited resources all contribute to self-control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 943-947.
86.
WelchM. R.TittleC. R.GrasmickH. G. (2006). Christian religiosity, self-control and social conformity. Social Forces, 84, 1605-1623.
87.
WikstromP. O.OberwittlerD.TreiberK.HardieB. (2012). Breaking rules: The social and situational dynamics of young people’s urban crime. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
88.
WikstromP. O.TreiberK. (2007). The role of self-control in crime causation: Beyond Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. European Journal of Criminology, 4, 237-264.
89.
WolfeS. E. (2011). The effect of low self-control on perceived police legitimacy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 67-74.
90.
WrightJ. P.BeaverK. M. (2005). Do parents matter in creating self-control in their children? A genetically-informed test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s theory of low self-control. Criminology, 43, 1169-1202.
91.
ZimmermanG. M. (2010). Impulsivity, offending, and the neighborhood: Investigating the person-context nexus. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 301-332.
