This article uses data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) to investigate the sex gap in violent crime. We posit that the sex gap decreases at higher levels of exposure to violent peers, and we test two competing explanations for this possibility. The first hypothesis, based on previous research using the PHDCN, suggests that there is a stronger nonlinear relationship between exposure to violent peers and respondent violence for females than for males. The second hypothesis points to sex differences in the shape of the nonlinear relationship between peer violence and respondent violence. We find that a decrease in the sex gap at higher levels of peer violence is due to (a) a stronger effect of peer violence exposure on individual violence for females than for males, and (b) a nonlinear peer violence/respondent violence relationship in the form of a decelerating curve that is consistent across the sexes.
AgnewR. S. (1991). The interactive effects of peer variables on delinquency. Criminology, 29, 47-72.
2.
AllisonP. D. (2001). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3.
AndersonE. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
4.
ArnoldR. (1990). Process of victimization and criminalization of Black women. Social Justice, 17, 153-166.
5.
BaumeisterR. F.SommerK. L. (1997). What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: Comment on Cross and Madson (1997). Psychological Bulletin, 122, 38-44.
6.
BelknapJ. (2007). The invisible woman: Gender, crime and justice (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
7.
BerndtT. J. (1992). Friendship and friends’ influence in adolescence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 156-159.
8.
Beyth-MaromR.AustinL.FischhoffB.PalmgrenC.Jacobs-QuadrelM. (1993). Perceived consequences of risky behaviors: Adults and adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 29, 549-563.
9.
BloomB.OwenB.CovingtonS. (2003). Gender responsive strategies: Research, practice and guiding principles for women offenders. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.
10.
BordenR. J. (1975). Witnessed aggression: Influence of an observer’s sex and values on aggressive responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 567-573.
11.
BrownL. M. (2003). Girlfighting: Betrayal and rejection among girls. New York, NY: New York University Press.
12.
BrunsonR. K.StewartE. A. (2006). Young African American women, the street code, and violence: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Crime & Justice, 29, 1-19.
13.
BurgessR.AkersR. L. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems14, 128-147.
14.
CarmenE. H.RiekerP. P.MillsT. (1984). Victims of violence and psychiatric illness. American Journal of Psychiatry, 14, 378-383.
15.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1992). Principles of epidemiology (2nd ed.). Atlanta, GA: Public Health Practice Program Office.
16.
Chesney-LindM. (1997). The female offender: Girls, women and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
Chesney-LindM.SheldonR. G. (2003). Girls, delinquency and juvenile justice (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Press.
18.
ClarkM. S.ReisH. T. (1988). Interpersonal processes in close relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 609-672.
19.
CohenG. L.PrinsteinM. J. (2006). Peer contagion of aggression and health risk behavior among adolescent males: An experimental investigation of effects on public conduct and private attitudes. Child Development, 77, 967-983.
CrossS. E.MadsonL. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37.
22.
DalyK. (1989). Gender and varieties of white-collar crime. Criminology, 27, 769-791.
23.
DalyK. (1992). Women’s pathways to felony court: Feminist theories of lawbreaking and problems of representation. Review of Law and Women’s Studies, 2, 11-52.
24.
DalyK. (1994). Gender, crime and punishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
DalyK. (1998). Gender, crime, and criminology. In TonryM. (Ed.), The handbook of crime and punishment (pp. 85-108). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26.
DalyK.MaherL. (1998). Crossroads and intersections: Building from feminist critique. In DalyK.MaherL. (Eds.), Criminology at the crossroads: Feminist readings in crime and justice (pp. 1-17). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
DeauxK. (1977). Sex differences. In BlassT. (Ed.), Personality variables in social behavior (pp. 357-377). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
ElliottD. S.HuizingaD.AgetonS. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
29.
ElliottD. S.MenardS. (1996). Delinquent friends and delinquent behavior: Temporal and developmental patterns. In HawkinsJ. D. (Ed.), Delinquency and crime (pp. 28-67). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
30.
FeingoldA. (1988). Matching for attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends: A meta-analysis and theoretical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226-235.
31.
FelsonR. B. (1982). Impression management and the escalation of aggression and violence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 245-254.
32.
FinemanM. (1990). Challenging law, establishing differences: The future of feminist legal scholarship. Florida Law Review, 42, 25-43.
33.
GibsonC. L.SullivanC. J.JonesS.PiqueroA. R. (2010). Does it take a village? Assessing neighborhood influences on children’s self-control. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 47, 31-62.
34.
GiordanoP. C.CernkovichS. A.PughM. D. (1986). Friendships and delinquency. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1170-1202.
35.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
HaynieD. L.OsgoodD. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter?Social Forces, 84, 1109-1130.
38.
HaynieD. L.SilverE.TeasdaleB. (2006). Neighborhood characteristics, peer networks, and adolescent violence. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 147-169.
39.
HeimerK.De CosterS. (1999). The gendering of violent delinquency. Criminology, 37, 277-317.
40.
JohnsonR. (1979). Juvenile delinquency and its origins. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
41.
JonesN. J. (2004). It’s not where you live, it’s how you live: How young women negotiate conflict and violence in the inner city. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595, 49-62.
42.
JonesN. J. (2009). Between good and ghetto: African American girls and inner city violence. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
43.
JonesN. J.BrownS. L.WanamakerK. A.GreinerL. E. (2014). A quantitative exploration of gendered pathways to crime in a sample of male and female juvenile offenders. Feminist Criminology, 9, 113-136.
44.
LauritsenJ. L.HeimerK.LynchJ. P. (2009). Trends in the gender gap in violent offending: New evidence from the National Crime Victimization Survey. Criminology, 47, 361-399.
45.
MaguireK. (2009). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics (Table 3.62.2009). Hindelang Criminal Justice Research Center, University at Albany. Retrieved from http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/pdf/t3622009.pdf
46.
MaguireK. (2010). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics (Table 4.8.2010). Hindelang Criminal Justice Research Center, University at Albany. Retrieved from http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/pdf/t482010.pdf
47.
MaherL. (1995). Dope girls: Gender, race, and class in the drug economy. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
48.
MaimonD.BrowningC. R. (2010). Unstructured socializing, collective efficacy, and violent behavior among urban youth. Criminology, 48, 443-474.
49.
MatsuedaR. L.AndersonK. (1998). The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology, 36, 269-308.
50.
McCarthyB.FelmleeD.HaganJ. (2004). Girl friends are better: Gender, friends, and crime among school and street youth. Criminology, 42, 805-835.
51.
McClellanD. S.FarabeeD.CrouchB. M. (1997). Early victimization, drug use and criminality: A comparison of male and female prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 455-476.
52.
MearsD. P.PloegerM.WarrM. (1998). Explaining the gender gap in delinquency: Peer influence and moral evaluations of behavior. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 35, 251-266.
53.
MesserschmidtJ. W. (1993). Masculinities and crime. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
54.
MillerJ. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston, MA: Beacon.
55.
MillerJ. B. (2001). One of the guys: Girls, gangs, and gender. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
56.
MillerJ. B. (2008). Getting played: African American girls, urban inequality, and gendered violence. New York: New York University Press.
57.
MillerJ. B.MullinsC. W. (2006). The status of feminist theories in criminology. In CullenF. T.WrightJ. P.BlevinsK. R. (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (Advances in Criminological Theory) (Vol. 15, pp. 217-249). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
58.
MorenoffJ. D.SampsonR. J. (1997). Violent crime and the spatial dynamics of neighborhood transition: Chicago, 1970-1990. Social Forces, 76, 31-64.
59.
MullinsC.WrightR.JacobsB. (2004). Gender, streetlife, and criminal retaliation. Criminology, 42, 911-940.
60.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (1991). National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Population estimates, 1991. Rockville, MD: Author.
61.
OrcuttJ. D. (1987). Differential association and marijuana use: A closer look at Sutherland (with a little help from Becker). Criminology, 25, 341-358.
62.
OsgoodD. W.McMorrisB. J.PotenzaM. T. (2002). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance I: Item response theory scaling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 267-296.
63.
OwenB.BloomB. (1995). Profiling women prisoners: Findings from national surveys and a California sample. The Prison Journal, 75, 165-185.
64.
PiqueroN. L.GoverA. R.MacDonaldJ. M.PiqueroA. R. (2005). The influence of delinquent peers on delinquency: Does gender matter?Youth & Society, 36, 251-275.
65.
PollockJ. M. (1999). Criminal women. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
66.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.
67.
RaudenbushS. W.JohnsonC.SampsonR. J. (2003). A multivariate, multilevel Rasch model with application to self-reported criminal behavior. Sociological Methodology, 33, 169-211.
68.
RaudenbushS. W.SampsonR. J. (1999). Ecometrics: Toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with application to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. Sociological Methodology, 29, 1-41.
69.
RawlinsW. K. (1992). Friendship matters: Communication, dialectics, and the life course. Hawthorne, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
70.
ReisigM. D.HoltfreterK.MorashM. (2006). Assessing recidivism risk across female pathways to crime. Justice Quarterly, 23, 384-405.
71.
RoystonP. (2005). Multiple imputation of missing values: Update. Stata Journal, 5, 188-201.
72.
SalisburyE. J.Van VoorhisP. (2009). Gendered pathways: A qualitative investigation of women probationers’ paths to incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 541-565.
73.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.RaudenbushS. W. (2005). Social anatomy of racial and ethnic disparities in violence. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 224-232.
74.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 603-651.
75.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
76.
SethiS.Nolen-HoeksemaS. (1997). Gender differences in internal and external focusing among adolescents. Sex Roles, 37, 687-700.
77.
SharkeyP. T. (2006). Navigating dangerous streets: The sources and consequences of street efficacy. American Sociological Review, 71, 826-846.
78.
SimonsR. L.MillerM. G.AignerS. M. (1980). Contemporary theories of deviance and female delinquency: An empirical test. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 17, 42-53.
79.
SmithD. A. (1979). Sex and deviance: An assessment of major sociological variables. Sociological Quarterly, 20, 183-195.
80.
SmithD. A.PaternosterR. (1987). The gender gap in theories of deviance: Issues and evidence. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 24, 140-172.
81.
SteffensmeierD.AllanE. (1996). Gender and crime: Toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 459-487.
82.
ThornberryT. P.KrohnM. D. (1997). Peers, drug use, and delinquency. In StoffD. M.BreilingJ.MaserJ. D. (Eds.), Handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 218-233). New York, NY: Wiley.
83.
ThornberryT. P.LizotteA. J.KrohnM. D.FarnworthM. D.JangS. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32, 601-637.
84.
TittleC. R. (1995). Control Balance: Towards a General Theory of Deviance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
85.
Van VoorhisP.SalisburyE. J.WrightE.BaumanA. (2008). Achieving accurate pictures of risk and identifying gender responsive needs: Two new assessments for women offenders. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.
86.
WarrM. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
87.
WechslerD. (1949). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125-151.
90.
ZimmermanG. M. (2010). Impulsivity, offending, and the neighborhood: Investigating the person-context nexus. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 301-322.
91.
ZimmermanG. M.MessnerS. F. (2010). Neighborhood context and the gender gap in adolescent violent crime. American Sociological Review, 76, 958-980.
92.
ZimmermanG. M.MessnerS. F. (2011). Neighborhood context and nonlinear peer effects on adolescent violent crime. Criminology, 49, 873-903.
93.
ZimmermanG. M.VásquezB. E. (2011). Decomposing the peer effect on adolescent substance use: Mediation, nonlinearity, and differential nonlinearity. Criminology, 49, 1235-1273.
