The Static-99 is the actuarial risk assessment instrument most commonly used and best validated for sexual offenders. Some research has indicated that the original version of the instrument does not sufficiently cover the influence of age-related decreases in recidivism risk of sexual offenders. Therefore, an age-corrected version, the Static-99R, has been proposed. It includes four age categories compared with only two in the original instrument. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of several age-related variables on the predictive accuracy of the German version of the Static-99 using a population-based sample of prison-released sexual offenders (N = 1,077). The results indicated that—for the prediction of sexual reoffenses in a population-based prison sample—the original Static-99 performed better than the age-corrected Static-99R. Theoretical and empirical implications for research as well as recommendations for applied risk assessment settings are discussed.
AalenO. O.BorganØ.GjessingH. K. (2008). Survival and event history analysis: A process point of view. New York, NY: Springer.
2.
AndersonD.HansonR. K. (2010). Static-99: An actuarial tool to assess risk of sexual and violent recidivism among sexual offenders. In OttoR. K.DouglasK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 251-267). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
3.
ArcherR. P.Buffington-VollumJ. K.StrednyR. V.HandelR. W. (2006). A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 84-94. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_07
4.
BarbareeH. E.BlanchardR. (2008). Sexual deviance over the lifespan: Reductions in deviant sexual behavior in the aging sex offender. In LawsD. R.O’DonohueW. (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment (2nd ed., pp. 37-60). New York, NY: Guilford.
5.
BarbareeH. E.LangtonC. M.BlanchardR. (2007). Predicting recidivism in sex offenders using the VRAG and SORAG: The contribution of age-at-release. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 6, 29-46.
6.
BarbareeH. E.LangtonC. M.BlanchardR.BoerD. P. (2008). Predicting recidivism in sex offenders using the SVR-20: The contribution of age-at-release. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 7, 47-64.
7.
BarbareeH. E.LangtonC. M.BlanchardR.CantorJ. M. (2009). Aging versus stable enduring traits as explanatory constructs in sex offenders recidivism: Partitioning actuarial predictions into conceptually meaningful components. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 443-465. doi:10.1177/0093854809332283
8.
BarbareeH. E.SetoM. C.LangtonC. M.PeacockE. J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 490-521. doi:10.1177/009385480102800406
9.
BartoshD. L.GarbyT.LewisD.GrayS. (2003). Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 422-438. doi:10.1177/0306624X03253850
10.
BoerD. P.HartS. D. (2009). Sex offender risk assessment: Research, evaluation, “best-practice” recommendations and future directions. In IrelandJ. L.IrelandC. A.BirchP. (Eds.), Violent and sexual offenders. Assessment, treatment and management (pp. 27-42). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
11.
BoerD. P.HartS. D.KroppP. R.WebsterC. D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk-20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver, Canada: The Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute.
12.
BontaJ.LawM.HansonR. K. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 123-142. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.123.2.123
13.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
14.
CraigL. A.BrowneK. D.StringerI.BeechA. (2004). Limitations in actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: A methodological note. British Journal of Forensic Practice, 6, 16-32.
15.
DawesR. M.FaustD.MeehlP. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgement. Science, 243, 1668-1674. doi:10.1126/science.2648573
16.
de VogelV.de RuiterC.van BeekD.MeadG. (2004). Predictive validity of the SVR-20 and Static-99 in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 235-251. doi:10.1023/B:LAHU.0000029137.41974.eb
17.
DorenD. M. (2006). What do we know about the effect of aging on recidivism risk for sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 137-157. doi:10.1177/107906320601800203
18.
DucroC.PhamT. (2006). Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static-99 on Belgian sex offenders committed to a forensic facility. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 15-26. doi:10.1177/107906320601800102
19.
EherR.MatthesA.SchillingF.Haubner-MacLeanT.RettenbergerM. (2012). Dynamic risk assessment in sexual offenders using STABLE-2000 and the STABLE-2007: An investigation of predictive and incremental validity. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 5-28. doi:10.1177/1079063211403164
20.
EherR.RettenbergerM.GaunersdorferK.Haubner-MacLeanT.MatthesA.SchillingF.MokrosA. (2013, April5). Über die Treffsicherheit der standardisierten Risikoeinschätzungsverfahren Static-99 und Stable-2007 bei aus einer Sicherungsmaßnahme entlassenen Sexualstraftätern [On the accuracy of the standardized risk assessment procedures Static-99 and Stable-2007 for sexual offenders released from detention]. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11757-013-0212-9
21.
EherR.RettenbergerM.SchillingF.PfäfflinF. (2008). Failure of Static-99 and SORAG to predict relevant reoffense categories in relevant sexual offender subtypes: A prospective study. Sexual Offender Treatment, 3, 1-14. Retrieved from http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/1-2008_02.html
22.
EherR.SchillingF.Haubner-MacLeanT.JahnT.RettenbergerM. (2012). Ermittlung des relativen und absoluten Rückfallrisikos mithilfe des Static-99 in einer deutschsprachigen Population entlassener Sexualstraftäter [Assessment of the relative and absolute risk of recidivism using Static-99 in a German-speaking population of released sexual offenders]. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 6, 32-40. doi:10.1007/s11757-011-0146-z
23.
FleissJ. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
24.
GailM. H.PfeifferR. M. (2005). On criteria for evaluating models of absolute risk. Biostatistics, 6, 227-239. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxi005
25.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
GroveW. M.MeehlP. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic)prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293-323. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293
27.
GroveW. M.ZaldD. H.LebowB. S.SnitzB. E.NelsonC. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19-30. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19
28.
HanleyJ. A.McNeilB. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 29-36.
29.
HansonR. K. (2002). Recidivism and age: Follow-up data on 4,673 sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 1046-1062. doi:10.1177/088626002236659
30.
HansonR. K. (2006). Does Static-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders?Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 343-355. doi:10.1007/s11194-006-9027-y
HansonR. K.BourgonG.HelmusL.HodgsonS. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865-890. doi:10.1177/0093854809338545
33.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1-21. doi:10.1037/a0014421
34.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2000). Improving risk assessment for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136. doi:10.1023/A:1005482921333
35.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2003). Notes on the development of Static-2002 (corrections research user report no. 2003-01). Ottawa, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
36.
HarrisA. J. R.HansonR. K. (2010). Clinical, actuarial, and dynamic risk assessment of sexual offenders: Why do things keep changing?Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16, 296-310. doi:10.1080/13552600.2010.494772
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E. (2003). Actuarial assessment of risk among sex offenders. In PrentkyR. A.JanusE. S.SetoM. C. (Eds.), Sexually coercive behavior: Understanding and management (Vol. 989, pp. 198-210). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
39.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E. (2007). Adjusting actuarial violence risk assessments based on aging or the passage of time. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 297-313. doi:10.1177/0093854806293486
40.
HelmusL.HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2011). International comparisons of the validity of actuarial risk tools for sexual offenders, with a focus on Static-99. In BoerD. P.CraigL. A.EherR.MinerM. H.PfäfflinF. (Eds.), International perspectives on the assessment and treatment of sexual offenders: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 57-84). Chichester, England: Wiley.
41.
HelmusL.HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2009).Reporting Static-99 in light of new research on recidivism norms. The Forum (Newsletter for the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers), 21, 38-45.
42.
HelmusL.HansonR. K.ThorntonD.BabchishinK. J.HarrisA. J. R. (2012). Absolute recidivism rates predicted by Static-99R and Static-2002R sex offender risk assessment tools vary across samples: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1148-1171. doi:10.1177/0093854812443648
43.
HelmusL.ThorntonD.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 64-101. doi:10.1177/1079063211409951
44.
HillA.HabermannN.KlusmannD.BernerW.BrikenP. (2008). Criminal recidivism in sexual homicide perpetrators. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52, 5-20. doi:10.1177/0306624X07307450
45.
HiltonN. Z.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.HoughtonR. E.EkeA. W. (2008). An in-depth actuarial assessment for wife assault recidivism: The Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 150-163. doi:10.1007/s10979-007-9088-6
46.
HirschiT.GottfredsonM. R. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552-584.
47.
LitwackT. R. (2001). Actuarial versus clinical assessments of dangerousness. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 409-433. doi:10.1037//1076-8971.7.2.409
48.
LöselF.SchmuckerM. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 117-146. doi:10.1007/s11292-004-6466-7
49.
MossmanD. (1994). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 783-792. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.62.4.783
PrentkyR. A.JanusE.BarbareeH. E.SchwartzB. K.KafkaM. P. (2006). Sexually violent predators in the courtroom: Science on trial. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 357-393. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.12.4.357
52.
PrentkyR. A.LeeA. F. S. (2007). Effect of age-at-release on long-term sexual re-offense rates in civilly committed sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 43-59. doi:10.1177/107906320701900105
53.
QuinseyV. L.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.CormierC. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
54.
RettenbergerM.BoerD. P.EherR. (2011). The predictive accuracy of risk factors in the Sexual Violence Risk-20 (SVR-20). Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1009-1027. doi:10.1177/0093854811416908
55.
RettenbergerM.EherR. (2006). Actuarial assessment of sex offender recidivism risk: A validation of the German version of the Static-99. Sexual Offender Treatment, 1, 1-11. Retrieved from http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/51.html
56.
RettenbergerM.MatthesA.BoerD. P.EherR. (2010). Prospective actuarial risk assessment: A comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 169-186. doi:10.1177/0306624X08328755
57.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615-620. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
58.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T.LangC.CormierC. (2006). Violent sex offenses: How are they best measured from official records?Law and Human Behavior, 30, 525-541. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9022-3
59.
RogersR. (2000). The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 595-605. doi:10.1023/A:1005575113507
60.
RowlandJ. M.GreenleafL. F.DorfmanW. J.DavidsonD. L. (1993). Aging and sexual function in men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 545-557.
61.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (2003). Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41, 555-592. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00997.x
62.
SjöstedtG.LangstromN. (2001). Actuarial assessment of sex offender recidivism risk: A cross-validation of the RRASOR and the Static-99 in Sweden. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 629-645. doi:10.1023/A:1012758307983
63.
Swinburne RomineR.DwyerS. M.MathiowetzC.ThomasM. (2008, October). Thirty years of sex offender specific treatment: A follow-up study. Poster presented at the conference for the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Atlanta, GA.
64.
ThorntonD. (2006). Age and sexual recidivism: A variable connection. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 123-135. doi:10.1177/107906320601800202
65.
ViallonV.RagusaS.Clavel-ChapelonF.BenichouJ. (2009). How to evaluate the calibration of a disease risk prediction tool. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 901-916. doi:10.1002/sim.3517
66.
WilsonR. J.CortoniF.VermaniM. (2007). Circles of support and accountability: A national replication of outcome findings (Report No. R-185). Ottawa, Ontario: Correctional Service of Canada.
67.
WilsonR. J.PichecaJ. E.PrinzoM. (2007). Evaluating the effectiveness of professionally-facilitated volunteerism in the community-based management of high-risk sexual offenders: Part two—A comparison of recidivism rates. Howard Journal, 46, 327-337. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2311.2007.00480.x
68.
WollertR. (2006). Low base rates limit expert certainty when current actuarials are used to identify sexually violent predators: An application of Bayes’s theorem. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 56-85. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.12.1.56
