The “successful psychopath” is thought to evade scientific study because most forensic psychopathy research is limited to incarcerated—putatively unsuccessful—samples. By redefining criminal success as the proportion of past undetected crimes, the present study tested the hypothesis that psychopathic traits are associated with criminal success within an incarcerated sample (N = 307). Psychopathy was assessed using the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised. Criminal history was assessed retrospectively for 24 violent and nonviolent crimes via self-report using a confidential semistructured interview. Controlling for social desirability score, greatest criminal success was associated with moderate to high psychopathy scores, particularly for violent crimes. At the trait level, antisocial lifestyle and behavioral psychopathic traits predicted increased criminal success, whereas affective psychopathic traits predicted decreased criminal success. These results suggest that criminal success can be meaningfully evaluated using an incarcerated sample and can inform models of psychopathy.
BabiakP.HareR. D. (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
2.
CleckleyH. (1976). The mask of sanity (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: C. V. Mosby.
3.
CookeD. J. (1998). Psychopathy across cultures. In CookeD. J.ForthA. E.HareR. D. (Eds.), Psychopathy: Theory, research and implications for society (pp. 13−45). New York, NY: Springer.
4.
CornellD. G.WarrenJ.HawkG.StaffordE.OramG.PineD. (1996). Psychopathy in instrumental and reactive violent offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 783-790.
5.
DanzigerS.LevavJ.Avnaim-PessoL. (2011). Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 6889-6892. doi:10.1073/pnas.1018033108
6.
DolanM.DoyleM. (2000). Violence risk prediction: Clinical and actuarial measures and the role of the Psychopathy Checklist. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 303-311. doi:10.1192/bjp.177.4.303
7.
DunfordF. W.ElliottD. S. (1984). Identifying career offenders using self-report data. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21, 57-86. doi:10.1177/0022427884021001004
8.
EhrlichI. (1996). Crime, punishment, and the market for offenses. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 43-67.
9.
ElliottD. S.DunfordF. W.HuizingaD. (1987). The identification and prediction of career offenders utilizing self-reported and official data. In BurchardJ. D.BurchardS. N. (Eds.), Prevention of delinquent behavior (pp. 90-121). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
EricksonM. L.GibbsJ. P.JensenG. F. (1977). Conventional and special crime and delinquency rates. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 68, 440-453. doi:10.2307/1142589
11.
FuleroS. (1996). Review of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised. In ConoleyJ. C.ImparaJ. C. (Eds.), 12th mental measurements yearbook (pp. 453-454). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute.
12.
GaoY.RaineA. (2010). Successful and unsuccessful psychopaths: A neurobiological model. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28, 194-210.
13.
GendreauP.LittleT.GogginC. (2006). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!Criminology, 34, 575-608.
14.
GlennA. L.KurzbanR.RaineA. (2011). Evolutionary theory and psychopathy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 371-380. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2011.03.009
15.
HareR. D. (1991). Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
16.
HareR. D. (1996). Psychopathy: A clinical construct whose time has come. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 24-54. doi:10.1177/0093854896023001004
17.
HareR. D. (2003). Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (2nd ed.). Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
18.
HarenskiC. L.HarenskiK. A.ShaneM. S.KiehlK. A. (2010). Aberrant neural processing of moral violations in criminal psychopaths. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 4, 863-874. doi:10.1037/a0020979
19.
HarpurT. J.HareR. D.HakstianA. R. (1989). Two-factor conceptualization of psychopathy: Construct validity and assessment implications. Psychological Assessment, 1, 6-17. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.1.1.6
20.
HorneyJ.MarshallI. H. (1992). Risk perceptions among serious offenders: The role of crime and punishment. Criminology, 30(4), 575-594. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01117.x
21.
HuizingaD.ElliottD. S. (1986). Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2(4), 293-327. doi:10.1007/BF01064258
22.
IshikawaS. S.RaineA.LenczT.BihrleS.LaCasseL. (2001). Autonomic stress reactivity and executive functions in successful and unsuccessful criminal psychopaths from the community. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 423-432. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.110.3.423
23.
KazemianL.Le BlancM. (2006). Differential cost avoidance and successful criminal careers: Random or rational?Crime & Delinquency, 53(1), 38-63. doi:10.1177/0011128706294438
24.
KoenigsM.KruepkeM.NewmanJ. P. (2010). Economic decision-making in psychopathy: A comparison with ventromedial prefrontal lesion patients. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2198-2204. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.012
25.
KronerD. G.MillsJ. F.MorganR. D. (2007). Underreporting of crime-related content and the prediction of criminal recidivism among violent offenders. Psychological Services, 4, 85-95. doi:10.1037/1541-1559.4.2.85
26.
KronerD. G.WeekesJ. R. (1996). Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: Factor structure, reliability, and validity with an offender sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 323-333. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(96)00079-7
27.
LussierP.MouchardM.BeauregardE. (2011). Patterns of criminal achievement in sexual offending: Unravelling the “successful” sex offender. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 433-444. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.08.001
28.
LykkenD. T. (1982, September20-28). Fearlessness: Its carefree charm and deadly risks. Psychology Today, pp. 20-28.
29.
MackJ. A. (1972). Able criminal. British Journal of Criminology, 12, 44-54.
30.
McCarthyB.HaganJ. (2001). When crime pays: Capital, competence, and criminal success. Social Forces, 79, 1035-1059.
31.
MichellD. G. V.ColledgeE.LeonardA.BlairR. J. R. (2002). Risky decision and response reversal: Is there evidence of orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction in psychopathic individuals?Neuropsychologia, 40, 2013-2022. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00056-8
32.
MillsJ. F.LozaW.KronerD. G. (2003). Predictive validity despite social desirability: Evidence for the robustness of self-report among offenders. Criminal Behaviour & Mental Health, 13, 144-154. doi:10.1002/cbm.536
33.
MorselliC.TremblayP. (2004). Criminal achievement, offender networks and the benefits of low self-control. Criminology, 42, 773-804. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00536.x
34.
MorselliC.TremblayP.McCarthyB. (2006). Mentors and criminal achievement. Criminology, 44(1), 17-43. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00041.x
35.
NewmanJ. P.SchmittW. A. (1998). Passive avoidance in psychopathic offenders: A replication and extension. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 527-532. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.107.3.527
36.
OsumiT.OhiraH. (2010). The positive side of psychopathy: Emotional detachment in psychopathy and rational decision-making in the ultimatum game. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 451-456. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.04.016
37.
PaulhusD. L. (1998). The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
38.
PaternosterR.SaltzmanL. E.WaldoG. P.ChiricosT. G. (1983). Perceived risk and social control: Do sanctions really deter?Law and Society Review, 17, 457-479. doi:10.2307/3053589
39.
PoythressN. G.EdensJ. F.LilienfeldS. O. (1998). Criterion-related validity of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory in a prison sample. Psychological Assessment, 10, 426-430. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.10.4.426
40.
RogersR.VitaccoM. J.JacksonR. L.MartinM.CollinsM.SewellK. W. (2002). Faking psychopathy? An examination of response styles with antisocial youth. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(1), 31-46. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7801_03
41.
RyanJ. J.LopezS. J.WerthT. R. (1999). Development and preliminary validation of a Satz-Mogel short form of the WAIS-III in a sample of persons with substance abuse disorders. International Journal of Neuroscience, 98, 131-140. doi:10.3109/00207459908994796
42.
SchmittW. A.BrinkleyC. A.NewmanJ. P. (1999). Testing Damasio’s somatic marker hypothesis with psychopathic individuals: Risk takers or risk averse?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 538-543. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.108.3.538
43.
SetoM. C.KhattarN. A.LalumiereM. L.QuinseyV. L. (1997). Deception and sexual strategy in psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 301-307. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00212-7
44.
SiegelR. A. (1978). Probability of punishment and suppression of behavior in psychopathic and nonpsychopathic offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 514-522. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.87.5.514
45.
SkeemJ. L.CookeD. J. (2010). Is criminal behavior a central component of psychopathy? Conceptual directions of resolving the debate. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 433-445. doi:10.1037/a0008512
46.
StalenheimE. G.von KnorringL. (1998). Personality traits and psychopathy in a forensic psychiatric population. European Journal of Psychiatry, 12, 83-94. Retrieved from http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php
47.
WebsterC. D.DouglasK. S.EavesD.HartS. D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing Risk for Violence, Version 2. Vancouver, Canada: Simon Fraser University. doi:wiley.com/10.1002/cbm.437
48.
WechslerD. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation.
49.
WidomC. S. (1977). A methodology for studying noninstitutionalized psychopaths. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45(4), 674-683. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.45.4.674
