The current study investigates the offending trajectories of juvenile sex offenders (JSOs) across and beyond adolescence. In doing so, the study examines the number, the rate, and the shape of nonsexual and sexual offending trajectories in a sample of JSOs followed retrospectively and prospectively from late childhood to adulthood. Using semiparametric group-based modeling, the study reveals the presence of five distinctive nonsexual offending and two sexual offending trajectories: adolescent-limited and high-rate slow desisters. The study does not find strong evidence of synchronicity between nonsexual and sexual trajectories, suggesting that the current taxonomy of antisocial behaviors may offer a limited perspective on sex offender types. Furthermore, sexual trajectories do not differ much across sex offender types, suggesting that the findings might be generalized to child and peer abusers. The study findings offer supporting evidence for the presence of two distinct JSO types with important implications for theory, research, and interventions.
BarbareeH. E.MarshallW. L. (2006). The juvenile sex offender (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
2.
BeauregardE.LussierP.ProulxJ. (2005). The role of sexual fantasy and situational factors on rapists’ modus operandi: Implications for offender profiling. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 265-278.
3.
BeckerJ. V. (1998). What we know about the characteristics and treatment of adolescents who have committed sexual offenses. Child Maltreatment, 3, 317-329.
4.
BeckerJ. V.HicksS. J. (2003). Juvenile sex offenders: Characteristics, interventions and policy issues. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 397-410.
5.
BeechA. R.WardT. (2004). The integration of etiology and risk in sex offenders: A theoretical model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 31-63.
6.
BergmanL. R.MagnussonD. (1997). A person-orientated approach to research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 291-319.
7.
BijleveldC. (2007). Sex offenders and sex offending. Crime and Justice, 35, 319-387.
8.
BijleveldC.HendriksJ. (2003). Juvenile sex offenders: Differences between group and solo offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 237-245.
9.
BlumsteinA.CohenJ.RothJ.VisherC. A. (1986). Criminal careers and “career criminals.”Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10.
BöhningD. (1998). Zero-inflated Poisson models and C.A.MAN: A tutorial collection of evidence. Biometrical Journal, 40, 833-843.
11.
ButlerS. M.SetoM. C. (2002). Distinguishing two types of adolescent sex offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 83-90.
12.
CaldwellM. (2002). What we do not know about juvenile sexual reoffense risk. Child Maltreatment, 7, 291-302.
13.
CarpentierJ.ProulxJ.LeclercB. (2011). Juvenile sexual offenders: Correlates of onset, variety, and desistance of criminal behavior. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 854-873.
14.
FranceK. G.HudsonS. M. (1993). The conduct disorders and the juvenile sex offenders. In BarbareeH. E.MarshallW. L.HudsonS. M. (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (pp. 225-234). New York, NY: Guilford.
15.
FriedrichW. N.TraneS. T. (2002). Sexual behavior in children across multiple settings. Child Abuse and Neglect, 26, 243-245.
16.
GravesR.OpenshawB. D. K.AscioneF.EricksenS. L. (1996). Demographic and parental characteristics of youthful sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 40, 300-317.
17.
GrothN. (1977). The adolescent sex offender and his prey. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 21, 249-254.
18.
HaganM. P.Gust-BreyK. L.ChoM. E.DowE. (2001). Eight-year comparative analyses of adolescent rapists, adolescent child molesters, other adolescent delinquents, and the general population. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 314-324.
19.
HendriksJ. (2006). Young sex offenders: A study of subtypes and recidivism. Utrecht, Netherlands: Educational Forum.
20.
HendriksJ.BijleveldC. (2008). Recidivism among juvenile sex offenders after residential treatment. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 14, 19-32.
21.
HendriksJ.van den BergC.BijleveldC. (2012). Juvenile sex offenders and reoffending. In BloklandA.LussierP. (Eds.), Sexual offenders: A criminal career approach. New York, NY: John Wiley.
22.
HunterJ. A.FigueredoA. J.MalamuthN. M.BeckerJ. V. (2003). Juvenile sex offenders: Towards the development of a typology. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 27-45.
23.
KennyD. T.KeoghT.SeidlerK. (2001). Predictors of recidivism in Australian juvenile sex offenders: Implications for treatment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 131-148.
24.
KnightR. A.PrentkyR. (1993). Exploring characteristics for classifying juvenile sex offenders. In BarbareeH. E.MarshallW. L.HudsonS. M. (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (pp. 45-79). New York, NY: Guilford.
25.
KnightR. A.RonisS. T.ZakirehB. (2009). Bootstrapping persistence risk indicators for juveniles who sexually offend. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 27, 878-909.
26.
KruttschnittC.UggenC.SheltonK. (2000). Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: The interaction of formal and informal social controls. Justice Quarterly, 17, 61-87.
27.
LalumièreM. L.HarrisG. T.QuinseyV. L.RiceM. E. (2005). The causes of rape: Understanding individual differences in male propensity for sexual aggression. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28.
LambertD. (1992). Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics, 34, 1-14.
29.
LångströmN.GrannM. (2000). Risk for criminal recidivism among young sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 855-871.
30.
LawsD. R.WardT. (2011). Desistance from sex offending: Alternatives to throwing away the keys. New York, NY: Guilford.
31.
LeBlancM.FréchetteM. (1989). Male criminal activity from childhood through youth: Multilevel and developmental perspectives. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
32.
LeBlancM.KaspyN. (1998). Trajectories of delinquency and problem behavior: Comparison of social and personal control characteristics of adjudicated boys on synchronous and nonsynchronous paths. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 181-214.
33.
LoeberR.LeBlancM. (1990). Toward a developmental criminology. Crime and Justice, 12, 375-473.
34.
LussierP. (2005). The criminal activity of sexual offenders in adulthood: Revisiting the specialization debate. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 269-292.
35.
LussierP.BouchardM.BeauregardE. (2011). Patterns of criminal achievement in sexual offending: Unravelling the “successful” sex offender. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 433-444.
36.
LussierP.CortoniF. (2008). The development of deviance in men. SchwartzB. (Ed.), The Sex Offender: Offender evaluation and program strategies. Volume 6 (pp. 2.1-2.26). New York: Civic Research Institute.
37.
LussierP.DaviesG. (2011). A person-oriented perspective on sexual offenders, offending trajectories, and risk of recidivism: A new challenge for policymakers, risk assessors, and actuarial prediction?Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 17, 530-561.
38.
LussierP.FarringtonD.MoffittT. E. (2009). Is the antisocial child father of the abusive man? A 40-year prospective longitudinal study on the developmental antecedents of intimate partner violence. Criminology, 47, 741-780.
39.
LussierP.HealeyJ. (2010). The developmental origins of sexual violence: Examining the co-occurrence of physical aggression and normative sexual behaviors in early childhood. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 1-23.
40.
LussierP.LeclercB.CaleJ.ProulxJ. (2007). Developmental pathways of deviance in sexual aggressors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1441-1462.
41.
LussierP.ProulxJ.LeBlancM. (2005). Criminal propensity, deviant sexual interests and criminal activity of sexual aggressors against women: A comparison of alternative explanatory models. Criminology, 43, 247-279.
42.
LussierP.TzoumakisS.CaleJ.AmiraultJ. (2010). Criminal trajectories of adult sex offenders and the age effect: Examining the dynamic aspect of offending in adulthood. International Criminal Justice Review, 20, 147-168.
43.
LussierP.TzoumakisS.HealeyJ.CorradoR.ReebyeP. (2011). Pre/perinatal adversities and behavioural outcomes in early childhood: Preliminary findings from the Vancouver Longitudinal Study. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 1-2, 36-64.
44.
LussierP.LeBlancM.ProulxJ. (2005). The generality of criminal behavior: A confirmatory factor analysis of the criminal activity of sexual offenders in adulthood. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 177-189.
45.
McCannK.LussierP. (2008). Antisociality, sexual deviance and sexual reoffending in juvenile sex offenders: A meta-analytical investigation. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6, 363-385.
46.
Miccio-FonsecaL. C.RasmussenL. A. (2009). New nomenclature for sexually abusive youth: Naming and assessing sexually violent predatory offenders. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 18, 106-128.
47.
MinerM. (2007). The fallacy of juvenile sex offender risk. Criminology and Public Policy, 6, 565-572.
48.
MoffittT. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
49.
MoffittT. E.CaspiA.HarringtonH.MilneB. J. (2002). Males on the life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways: Follow-up at age 26 years. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 179-207.
50.
NaginD. S. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
NisbetI. A.WilsonP. H.SmallboneS. W. (2004). A prospective longitudinal study of sexual recidivism among adolescent sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 223-234.
52.
PiqueroA. R. (2008). Taking stock of developmental trajectories of criminal activity over the life course. In LibermanA. M. (Ed.), The long view of crime: A synthesis of longitudinal research (pp. 23-77). New York, NY: Springer.
53.
PiqueroA. R.MoffittT. E. (2005). Explaining the facts of crime: How the developmental taxonomy replies to Farrington’s invitation. In FarringtonD. P. (Ed.), Integrated developmental and life-course theories of offending (pp. 51-72). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
54.
PrentkyR.HarrisB.FrizzellK.RighthandS. (2000). An actuarial procedure for assessing risk with juvenile sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 71-93.
55.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (2005). A life-course view of the development of crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602, 12-45.
56.
SetoM. C.BarbareeH. E. (1997). Sexual aggression as antisocial behavior: A developmental model. In StoffD.BreilingJ.MaserJ. D. (Eds.), Handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 524-533). New York, NY: John Wiley.
57.
SetoM. C.LalumièreM. L. (2010). What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending? A review and test of explanations through meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 526-575.
58.
SkardhamarT. (2009). Reconsidering the theory on adolescent-limited and life-course persistent anti-social behaviour. British Journal of Criminology, 49, 863-878.
59.
SmallboneS. (2006). Social and psychological factors in the development of delinquency and sexual deviance. In BarbareeH. E.MarshallW. L. (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (2nd ed., pp. 105-127). New York, NY: Guilford.
60.
TewksburyR.JenningsW. G. (2010). Assessing the impact of sex offender registration and community notification on sex offending trajectories. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 570-582.
61.
TzoumakisS.LussierP.LeBlancM.DaviesG. (2011). Onset, offending trajectories and crime specialization in violence. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice. Manuscript submitted for publication.
62.
van den BergC. J. W.BijleveldC. C. J. H.HendriksJ. (2011). Jeugdige zedendelinquenten. Lange termijn criminele carrières en achtergrondkenmerken [Juvenile sex offenders: Long-term criminal careers and background characteristics]. Criminology, 53, 227-243.
63.
Van der GeestV.BloklandA.BijleveldA. (2009). Delinquent development in a sample of high-risk youth: Shape, content, and predictors of delinquent trajectories from age 12 to 32. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46, 111-143.
64.
Van WijkA.MaliB.BullensR.VermeirenR. (2007). Criminal profiles of violent juvenile sex and violent juvenile non-sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 1340-1355.
65.
Van WijkA.VermeirenR.LoeberR.Hart-KerkhoffsL.DoreleijersT.BullensR. (2006). Juvenile sex offenders compared to non-sex offenders: A review of the literature 1995–2005. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 7, 227-243.
66.
VenezianoC.VenezianoL. (2002). Adolescent sex offenders: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 3, 247-260.
67.
ViljoenJ. L.ElkovitchN.ScaloraM. J.UllmanD. (2009). Assessment of reoffense risk in adolescents who have committed sexual offenses: Predictive validity of the ERASOR, PCL:YV, YLS/CMI, and Static-99. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 981-1000.
68.
Von EyeA.BogatG. A. (2006). Person-oriented and variable-oriented research: Concepts, results, and development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 390-420.
69.
WeinrottM. (1996). Juvenile sexual aggression: A critical review. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.
70.
WorlingJ. (2001). Personality-based typology of adolescent male sexual offenders: Differences in recidivism rates, victim-selection characteristics, and personal victimization histories. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 149-166.
71.
WorlingJ.LångströmN. (2006). Risk of sexual recidivism in adolescents who offend sexually: Correlates and assessment. In BarbareeH. E.MarshallW. L. (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (2nd ed., pp. 219-247). New York, NY: Guilford.
72.
ZimringF. E. (2004). An American travesty: Legal responses to adolescent sexual offending. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
73.
ZimringF. E.PiqueroA. R.JenningsW. R. (2007). Sexual delinquency in Racine: Does early sex offending predict later sex offending in youth and young adulthood. Criminology and Public Policy, 6, 507-534.
