This pilot study compared outcomes for 94 women offenders in San Diego County, California, who participated in four drug court programs. Women were randomized to gender-responsive (GR) programs using Helping Women Recover and Beyond Trauma or standard mixed-gender treatment. Data were collected at program entry, during treatment, and approximately 22 months after treatment entry. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. Results showed that GR participants had better in-treatment performance, more positive perceptions related to their treatment experience, and trends indicating reductions in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptomology. Both groups improved in their self-reported psychological well-being and reported reductions in drug use (p < .06) and arrest (a diagnosis of PTSD was the primary predictor of reductions in rearrest, p < .04). Findings show some beneficial effects of adding treatment components oriented toward women’s needs. Significant questions remain, particularly around PTSD and whether it should be targeted to improve substance use outcomes for women.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
AnnisH. M.GrahamJ. M. (1988). Situational Confidence Questionnaire. Toronto, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation.
3.
BinswangerI. A.MerrillJ. O.KruegerP. M.WhiteM. C.BoothR. E.ElmoreJ. G. (2010). Gender differences in chronic medical, psychiatric, and substance-dependence disorders among jail inmates. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 476-482.
4.
BloomB. (1999). Gender-responsive programming for women offenders: Guiding principles and practices. Forum on Corrections Research, 11, 22-27.
5.
BloomB.OwenB.CovingtonS. (2003). Gender-responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. Retrieved from http://nicic.org/pubs/2003/018017.pdf
6.
BloomB.OwenB.CovingtonS. (2004). Women offenders and gendered effects of public policy. Review of Policy Research, 21, 31-48.
7.
CalhounS.MessinaN. P.TaubeS.BondK.OrdilleA. (2010, November). Client satisfaction with women-focused versus mixed-gender drug court treatment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, CA.
8.
CovingtonS. (2000). A Woman’s Way through the Twelve Steps Workbook. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
9.
CovingtonS. (2002). Women in Recovery: Understanding Addiction. Carson City, NV: The Change Companies.
10.
CovingtonS. (2003). Beyond trauma: A healing journey for women. Facilitator’s guide. Center City, MN: Hazelden Press.
11.
CovingtonS. (2008). Helping women recover: A program for treating substance abuse. Facilitator’s guide–Revised edition for use in the criminal justice system. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
12.
CovingtonS.SurreyJ. (1997). The relational theory of women’s psychological development: Implications for substance abuse. In WilsnakS.WilsnakR. (Eds.), Gender and alcohol: Individual and social perspectives (pp. 335-351). Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
13.
DahlgrenL.WillanderA. (1989). Are special treatment facilities for female alcoholics needed? A controlled 2-year follow-up study from a specialized female unit (EWA) versus a mixed male/female treatment facility. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 13, 499-504.
14.
DeLeonG. (2000). The therapeutic community: Theory, model and method. New York, NY: Springer.
15.
EngstromM.El-BasselN.GoH.GilbertL. (2008). Childhood sexual abuse and intimate partner violence among women in methadone treatment: A direct or mediated relationship?Journal of Family Violence, 23, 605-617.
16.
FoaE. B. (1997). Trauma and women: Course, predictors and treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 58, 25-28.
17.
FoaE. B.CashmanL.JaycoxL.PerryK. (1997). The validation of a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder: The Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale. Psychological Assessment, 9, 445-451.
18.
GreenfieldS. F.BackS. E.LawsonK.BradyK. T. (2010). Substance abuse in women. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 33, 339-355.
19.
GreenfieldS. F.BrooksA. J.GordonS. M.GreenC. A.KroppF.McHughR. K.. . . MieleG. (2007). Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: A review of the literature. Drug Alcohol Dependency, 86, 1-21.
20.
GreenfieldS. F.GrellaC. (2009). What is women-focused treatment for substance abuse?Psychiatric Services, 60, 880-882.
21.
GreenfieldS. F.PotterJ. S.LincolnM. F.PopuchiR. E.KupertL.GallopR. J. (2008). High psychiatric severity is a moderator of substance abuse treatment outcomes among women in single vs. mixed gender group treatment. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 34, 594-602.
22.
GrellaC. (1999). Women in residential drug treatment: Differences by program type and pregnancy. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 10, 216-229.
23.
GrellaC. (2008). From generic to gender-responsive treatment: Changes in social policies, treatment services, and outcomes of women in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 40, 327-343.
24.
GrellaC. E.JoshiV. (1999). Gender differences in drug treatment careers among clients in the national drug abuse treatment outcome study. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 25, 385-406.
25.
GrellaC. E.JoshiV.HserY.-I. (2000). Program variation in treatment outcomes among women in residential drug treatment. Evaluation Review, 24, 364-383.
26.
GrellaC. E.PolinskyM. L.HserY.PerryS. (1999). Characteristics of women-only and mixed-gender drug abuse treatment programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 17, 37-44.
27.
HollowayK.BennettT. (2007). Gender differences in drug misuse and related problem behaviors among arrestees in the UK. Substance Use and Misuse, 42, 899-921.
28.
HserY. I.EvansE.HuangDMessinaN. (2011). Long-term outcomes among drug-dependent mothers treated in women-only versus mixed-gender programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 41, 115-123.
29.
KaskutasL. A.ZhangL.FrenchM. T.WitbrodtJ. (2005). Women’s programs versus mixed-gender day treatment: Results from a randomized study. Addiction, 100, 60-69.
30.
KellyS.SchwartzR.O’GradyK.MitchellS.ReisingerH.PetersonJ.BrownB. (2009). Gender differences among in- and out-of treatment opioid-addicted individuals. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 35, 38-42.
31.
KnightK.HolcomM.SimpsonD. D. (1994). TCU Psychosocial Functioning and Motivation Scales: Manual on psychometric properties. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research.
32.
LanganN.PelissierB. (2001). Gender differences among prisoners in drug treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 291-301.
33.
LiangK. Y.ZegerS. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13-22.
34.
MakariosM.SteinerB.TravisL. F. (2010). Examining the predictors of recidivism among men and women released from prison in Ohio. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1377-1391.
35.
McClellanD.FarabeeD.CouchB. (1997). Early victimization, drug use, and criminality: A comparison of male and female prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 455-476.
36.
McLellanA. T.AltermanA. I.CacciolaJ.MetzgerD.O’BrienC. P. (1992). A new measure of substance abuse treatment: Initial studies of the Treatment Services Review. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 180, 101-110.
37.
MessinaN.BurdonW.PrendergastM. (2003). Assessing the needs of women in institutional therapeutic communities. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 37, 89-106.
38.
MessinaN.GrellaC.BurdonW.PrendergastM. (2007). Childhood adverse events and current traumatic distress: A comparison of men and women prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1385-1401.
39.
MessinaN.GrellaC.CartierJ.TorresS. (2010). A randomized experimental study of gender responsive substance abuse treatment for women in prison. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38, 97-107.
40.
MessinaN.Marinelli-CaseyP.HillhouseM.RawsonR.HunterJ.AngA. (2008). Childhood adverse events and onset and severity of methamphetamine dependence among men and women. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 3, 399-409.
41.
MessinaN.WishE.NemesS. (2000). Predictors of treatment outcomes in men and women admitted to a therapeutic community. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 26, 207-228.
42.
NichC.CarrollK. M. (2002). Intention-to-treat meets missing data: Implications of alternate strategies for analyzing clinical trials data. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, 121-130.
43.
OrwinR. G.FranciscoL.BernichonT. (2001) Effectiveness of women’s substance abuse treatment programs: A meta-analysis. Arlington, VA/Washington, DC: National Evaluation Data Services, Battelle Centers for Public Health Research and Evaluation/Centers for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration.
44.
OserC.KnudsenH.Staton-TindallM.LeukefeldC. (2009). The adoption of wraparound services among substance abuse treatment organizations serving criminal offenders: The role of a women-specific program. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 1035, 582-590.
45.
PalmJ. (2007). Women and men: Same problems, different treatment. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16, 18-31.
PrendergastM.MessinaN.HallN.WardaN. (2011). The relative effectiveness of women-only vs. mixed-gender substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 40, 336-348.
48.
RettingerL. J.AndrewsD. A. (2010). General risk and need, gender specificity, and the recidivism of female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 29-46.
49.
SimpsonD. D. (1981). Treatment for drug abuse: Follow-up outcomes and length of time spent. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 875-880.
50.
StatonM.LeukefeldC.WebsterJ. M. (2003). Substance use, health and mental health: Problems and service utilization among incarcerated women. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 224-239.
51.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration. (2005). National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS): (2005). Data on substance abuse treatment facilities (DASI SeriesS-34). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration, Office of Applied Studies.
52.
TuchmanE. (2010). Women and addiction: The importance of gender issues in substance abuse research. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 29, 127-138.
53.
Van VoorhisP.WrightE. M.SalisburyE.BaumanA. (2010). Women’s risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of a gender-responsive supplement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 261-288.
54.
Wasilow-MuellerS.EricksonC. (2001). Drug abuse and dependency: Understanding gender differences in etiology and management. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 42, 78-90.
55.
WisdomJ. P.HoffmanK.RechbergerE.SeimK.OwensB. (2009). Women-focused treatment agencies and process improvement: Strategies to increase client engagement. Women and Therapy, 32, 69-87.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
