The real-life questioning practices of Canadian police officers were examined. Specifically, 80 transcripts of police interviews with suspects and accused persons were coded for the type of questions asked, the length of interviewee response to each question, the proportion of words spoken by interviewer(s) and interviewee, and whether or not a free narrative was requested. Results showed that, on average, less than 1% of the questions asked in an interview were open-ended, and that closed yes–no and probing questions composed approximately 40% and 30% of the questions asked, respectively. The longest interviewee responses were obtained from open-ended questions, followed by multiple and probing question types. A free narrative was requested in approximately 14% of the interviews. The 80–20 talking rule was violated in every interview. The implications of these findings for reforming investigative interviewing of suspects and accused persons are discussed.
BaldwinJ. (1993). Police interview techniques: Establishing truth or proof?British Journal of Criminology, 33, 325-352.
2.
BeuneK.GiebelsE.AdairW. L.FennisB. M.Van Der ZeeK. I. (2011). Strategic sequences in police interviews and the importance of order and cultural fit. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 934-954. doi:10.1177/009385481141217010.1177/0093854811412170
3.
BeuneK.GiebelsE.TaylorP. (2010). Patterns of interaction in police interviews: The role of cultural dependency. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 904-925. doi:10.1177/009385481036962310.1177/0093854810369623
4.
BullR.SoukaraS. (2010). Four studies of what really happens in police interviews. In LassiterG. D.MeissnerC. A. (Eds.), Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations (pp. 81-69). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5.
ClarkeC.MilneR.BullR. (2011). Interviewing suspects of crime: The impact of PEACE training, supervision, and the presence of a legal advisor. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8, 149-162. doi:10.1002/jip.14410.1002/jip.144
6.
CliffordB. R.GeorgeR. (1996). A field evaluation of training in three methods of witness/victim investigative interviewing. Psychology, Crime and Law, 2, 231-248. doi:10.1080/1068316960840978010.1080/10683169608409780
7.
CohenJ. (1960). A coefficient for agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46. doi:10.1177/00131644600200010410.1177/001316446002000104
8.
FeldB. C. (2006). Police interrogation of juveniles: An empirical study of policy and practice. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 97, 219-316.
9.
FisherR. P. (1995). Interviewing victims and witnesses of crime. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 1, 732-764. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.1.4.73210.1037/1076-8971.1.4.732
10.
FisherR. P.GeiselmanR. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
11.
FisherR. P.GeiselmanR. E.RaymondD. S. (1987). Critical analysis of police interview techniques. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15, 177-185.
12.
GranhagP. A.StromwallL.HartwigM. (2007). The SUE technique: The way to interview to detect deception. Forensic Update, 88, 25-29.
13.
GriffithsA.MilneR. (2006). Will it all end in tiers? Police interviews with suspects in Britain. In WilliamsonT. (Ed.), Investigative interviewing: Rights, research, regulation (pp. 167-189). Cullompton, UK: Willan.
14.
GriffithsA.MilneR.CherrymanJ. (2011). A question of control? The formulation of suspect and witness interview question strategies by advanced interviewers. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 13, 255-267. doi:10.1350/ijps.2011.13.3.21910.1350/ijps.2011.13.3.219
15.
HolmbergU.ChristiansonS. (2002). Murderers’ and sexual offenders’ experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 31-45. doi:10.1002/bsl.47010.1002/bsl.470
16.
InbauF. E.ReidJ. E.BuckleyJ. P. (2004). Criminal interrogation and confessions (4th ed.). Burlington, VT: Jones & Bartlett.
17.
KassinS. M.GoldsteinC. C.SavitskyK. (2003). Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 187-203. doi:10.1023/A:102259923059810.1023/A:1022599230598
18.
KassinS. M.LeoR. A.MeissnerC. A.RichmanK. D.ColwellL. H.LeachA.La FonD. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 381-400. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9073-510.1007/s10979-006-9073-5
19.
KebbellM.AlisonL.HurrenE.MazerolleP. (2010). How do sex offenders think the police should interview to elicit confessions from sex offenders?Psychology, Crime and Law, 16, 567-584. doi:10.1080/1068316090297105510.1080/10683160902971055
20.
KingL.SnookB. (2009). Peering inside the Canadian interrogation room: An examination of the Reid model of interrogation, influence tactics, and coercive strategies. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 674-694. doi:10.1177/009385480933514210.1177/0093854809335142
21.
LambM. E.HershkowitzI.OrbachY.EsplinP. W. (2008). Tell me what happened: Structured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
22.
LandisR.KochG. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174. doi:10.2307/252931010.2307/2529310
23.
LassiterG. D.MeissnerC. A. (2010). Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24.
LeoR. A. (1996). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 86, 266-303. doi:10.2307/114402810.2307/1144028
25.
LiptonJ. (1977). On the psychology of eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 90-95. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.62.1.9010.1037//0021-9010.62.1.90
26.
MeyerJ. R.ReppucciN. D. (2007). Police practices and perceptions regarding juvenile interrogation and interrogative suggestibility. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 757-780. doi:10.1002/bsl.77410.1002/bsl.774
27.
MilneR.BullR. (2003). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
28.
MilneB.ShawG.BullR. (2007). Investigative interviewing: The role of research. In CarsonD.MilneB.PakesF.ShalevK.ShawyerA. (Eds.), Applying psychology to criminal justice (pp. 65-80). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
29.
MyklebustT.AlisonL. J. (2000). The current state of police interviews with children in Norway: How discrepant are they from models based on current issues in memory and communication?Psychology, Crime and Law, 6, 331-351. doi:10.1080/1068316000840981010.1080/10683160008409810
30.
O’ConnorT.CarsonW. (2005). Understanding the psychology of child molesters: A key to getting confessions. Police Chief, 72, 70-74,76.
31.
ReadJ. M.PowellM. B.KebbellM. R.MilneR. (2009). Investigative interviewing of suspected sex offenders: A review of what constitutes best practice. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 11, 442-459. doi:10.1350/ijps.2009.11.4.14310.1350/ijps.2009.11.4.143
32.
ShepherdE. (2007). Investigative interviewing: The conversation management approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33.
SmithV. L.EllsworthP. C. (1987). The social psychology of eyewitness accuracy: Misleading questions and communicator expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 294-300. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.2.29410.1037/0021-9010.72.2.294
34.
SnookB.HouseJ. C.MacDonaldS.EastwoodJ. (in press). Police witness interview training, supervision, and feedback: A survey of Canadian police officers. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice.
35.
SnookB.KeatingK. (2010). A field study of adult witness interviewing practices in a Canadian police organization. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16, 160-172. doi:10.1348/135532510X49725810.1348/135532510X497258
36.
SoukaraS.BullR.VrijA.TurnerM.CherrymanJ. (2009). What really happens in police interviews of suspects? Tactics and confessions. Psychology, Crime and Law, 15, 493-506. doi:10.1080/1068316080220182710.1080/10683160802201827
37.
VanderhallenM.VervaekeG.HolmbergU. (2011). Witness and suspect perceptions of working alliance and interviewing style. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8, 110-130. doi:10.1002/jip.13810.1002/jip.138
38.
WalshD. W.BullR. (2010). What really is effective in interviews with suspects? A study comparing interviewing skills against interviewing outcomes. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 305-321. doi:10.1348/135532509X46335610.1348/135532509X463356
39.
WalshD. W.MilneR. (2008). Keeping the PEACE? A study of investigative interviewing practices in the public sector. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 39-57. doi:10.1348/135532506X15717910.1348/135532506X157179
40.
WrightA. M.AlisonL. J. (2004). Questioning sequences in Canadian police interviews: Constructing and confirming the course of events?Psychology, Crime and Law, 10, 137-154. doi:10.1080/106831603100009912010.1080/1068316031000099120
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
