To investigate whether diversion to a pretrial community-based diversion program reduced sexual recidivism in adult intrafamilial child sex offenders, 208 offenders assessed for treatment between 1989 and 2003 were monitored for periods ranging from 2.8 to 18 years. Participants accepted for treatment (n = 88) were compared to those who declined (n = 120). After applying propensity score analysis to control for selection bias, Probit regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to estimate rates of desistance between the groups. Although differences were not statistically significant, estimated rates of sexual reoffending were lower and time taken to sexually reoffend was longer in the diverted than the undiverted group. An overall effect size for treatment was large (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.18, 1.5), and examination of the recidivists in the treatment group supported inferences of positive treatment effects. Limitations of this study are examined, and future directions for intrafamilial sex offender treatment are discussed.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2009a). Child protection Australia 2007–08: Child Welfare Series 45. Canberra: Author.
2.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2009b). A picture of Australia’s children 2009. Canberra: Author.
3.
BaserO. (2006). Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching. International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 9, 377-385.
4.
BeechA.BourgonG.HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. R.LangtonC.MarquesJ.. . . YatesP. M. (2007). Sexual offender treatment outcome research: Campbell Collaborative Outcome Data Committee guidelines for evaluation: Part 1: Introduction and overview. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/res/cor/rep/_fl/CODC_07_e.pdf
5.
BeechA. R.CraigL. A.BrowneK. D. (2009). Assessment and treatment of sex offenders: A handbook. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
6.
BrownJ. L.BrownG. S. (1997). Characteristics and treatment of incest offenders: A review. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 1, 335-354.
7.
CaliendoM.KopeinigS. (2005, April). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Presentation at the German Institute for Economic Research, Bonn, Germany. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp1588.pdf
8.
CampbellT. W. (2004). Assessing sex offenders: Problems and pitfalls. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
ChungD.O’LearyP. J.HandT. (2006). Sexual violence offenders: prevention and intervention approaches, June 2006 (No. 5). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
11.
CollinsE.PetersL.LenningsC. J. (2009). Community intervention with sex offenders: Do dynamic risk factors change with treatment?Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 87-97.
12.
CookR. J.SackettD. L. (1995). The number needed to treat: A clinically useful measure of treatment effect. British Medical Journal, 310, 452-454.
13.
CossinsA. (2010). Alternative models for prosecuting child sex offences in Australia. Sydney, Australia: National Child Sexual Assault Reform Committee.
14.
CraigL. A.BrowneK. D.StringerI. (2003). Risk scales and factors predictive of sexual offence recidivism. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4, 45-69.
15.
Crime and Misconduct Commission. (2003). Seeking justice: An enquiry into how sexual offences are handled by the Queensland Criminal Justice System. Brisbane, Australia: Author. Retrieved http://www.cmc.qld.gov.au
16.
EastwoodC.KiftS.GraceR. (2006). Attrition in child sexual assault cases: Why Lord Chief Justice Hale got it wrong. Journal of Judicial Administration, 16, 81-91.
17.
FinkelhorD. (2009). The prevention of childhood sexual abuse. Future of Children, 19, 169-194.
GelbK. (2007). Recidivism of sex offenders. Melbourne: Sentencing Advisory Council of Australia.
20.
Goodman-DelahuntyJ. (2009). The NSW Pre-Trial Diversion of Offenders (Child Sexual Assault) Program: An evaluation of treatment outcomes (Research report). Sydney, Australia: Sydney West Area Health Services.
21.
GuoS.FraserM. W. (2010). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
HansonR. K.GordonA.HarrisA. J. R.MarquesJ. K.MurphyW.QuinseyV. L.SetoM. C. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169-194.
HermanJ. L. (2000). Father-daughter incest. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
HillJ. (2008). Discussion of research using propensity-score matching: Comments on “A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003” by Peter Austin. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2055-2061. doi:10.1002/sim.324510.1002/sim.3245
27.
HollisS.CampbellF. (1999). What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal, 319, 670-674.
28.
JoffeM. M.RosenbaumP. R. (1999). Propensity scores. American Journal of Epidemiology, 150, 327-333.
29.
JohnsonS. A. (2007). Physical abusers and sexual offenders: Forensic and clinical strategies. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
30.
JonesN.PelissierB.Klein-SaffranJ. (2006). Predicting sex offender treatment entry among individuals convicted of sexual offense crimes. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 83-98.
31.
KellerR. A.CicchinelliL. F.GardnerD. M. (1989). Characteristics of child sexual abuse treatment programs. Child Abuse & Neglect, 13, 361-368.
32.
KingstonD. A.FirestoneP.WexlerA.BradfordJ. M. (2008). Factors associated with recidivism among intrafamilial child molesters. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 14, 3-18.
LievoreD. (2004, May). Recidivism of sexual assault offenders: Rates, risk factors and treatment efficacy. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
35.
LöselF.SchmuckerM. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 117-146.
36.
McSherryB.KeyzerP.FreibergA. (2006). Preventative detention for “dangerous” offenders in Australia: A critical analysis and proposals for policy development (Report to the Criminology Research Council). Melbourne, Australia: Monash University. Retrieved from http://www.criminologyresearchcouncil.gov.au/reports/200405-03.pdf
37.
ParkinsonP.ShrimptonS.SwanstonH.O’TooleB.OatesK. (2002). The process of attrition in child sexual assault cases: A case flow analysis of criminal investigations and prosecutions. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 35, 347-362.
38.
PayneJ. (2007). Recidivism in Australia: Findings and future research (Research and Public Policy Series 80). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
39.
PratleyJ.Goodman-DelahuntyJ. (2011). Increased self-disclosure of offending by intrafamilial child sex offenders. Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 3, 44-52.
40.
PrentkyR. A.LeeA. F. S.KnightR. A.CerceD. (1997). Recidivism rates among child molesters and rapists: A methodological analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 635-659.
41.
Pre-Trial Diversion of Offenders (Child Sexual Assault) Act 1985 No. 153 (NSW).
42.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2003). The size and sign of treatment effects in sex offender therapy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 428-440.
43.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. American Statistician, 39, 33-38.
44.
RosnerB. (2006), Fundamentals of biostatistics. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
45.
RudnerL. M.PeytonJ. (2006). Consider propensity scores to compare treatments. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 11(9), 1-9.
46.
SchweitzerR.DwyerJ. (2003). Sex crime recidivism: Evaluation of a sexual offender treatment program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 1292-1310. doi:10.1177/088626050325665810.1177/0886260503256658
47.
ShermanL. W.GottfredsonD.MacKenzieD.EckJ.ReuterP.BushwayS. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising (Report to the U.S. Congress). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
48.
SmallboneS.MarshallW. L.WortleyR. (2008). Preventing child sexual abuse: Evidence, policy and practice. Devon, UK: Willan.
49.
StalansL. J. (2004). Adult sex offenders on community supervision: A review of recent assessment strategies and treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 564-608.
50.
TaylorC. S.GassnerL. (2010). Stemming the flow: Challenges for policing adult sexual assault with regard to attrition rates and under-reporting of sexual offences. Police Practice and Research, 11, 240-255.
51.
TitcombC.Goodman-DelahuntyJ.Waubert de PuiseauB. (2012). Pretrial diversion for intrafamilial child sexual offending: Does biological paternity matter?Criminal Justice and Behavior: Special Issue on Diversion from the Criminal Justice System, 39.
52.
VillettazP.KilliasM.ZoderI. (2006). The effects of custodial vs. non-custodial sentences on reoffending: A systematic review of the state of knowledge (Report to the Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group). doi:10.4073/csr.2006.1310.4073/csr.2006.13. Retrieved from http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/lib/download/108/
53.
WeitzenS.LapaneK. L.ToledanoA. Y.HumeA. L.MorV. (2004). Principles for modeling propensity scores in medical research: A systematic literature review. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 13, 841-853. doi:10.1002/pds.96910.1002/pds.969
54.
WongS. C. P.OlverM. (2010). The Violence Risk Scale and the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender Version. In OttoR.DouglasK. (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 121-146). New York, NY: Routledge.
55.
WoodR. M.GrossmanL. S.FichtnerC. G. (2000). Psychological assessment, treatment, and outcome with sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 23-41.
56.
WoodrowA. C.BrightD. A. (2010). Effectiveness of a sex offender treatment programme: A risk band analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 43-55. doi:10.1177/0306624X0935216210.1177/0306624X09352162
