The Level of Service Inventory—Revised (LSI-R) assesses the risk of reoffending and identifies criminogenic need characteristics of offenders. Despite the assessment’s popularity, its factor structure remains under-researched. Inconsistency in published research may be attributed to the misuse, and inappropriate statistical analyses, of the LSI-R subscale scores. The present study explored the factor structure of the LSI-R, at the item level, using a sample of Australian offenders. Binary exploratory factor analysis found a five-factor solution for male offenders and a four-factor solution for female offenders. Using these data to “recalibrate” the LSI-R, sensitivity and specificity comparisons of the original and modified LSI-R were undertaken. With specific attention to Indigenous status and types of sentence orders served, sensitivity and specificity improvements were observed. Findings are discussed in terms of the value of exploring latent constructs and validating assessment tools, as well as the potential impact on the management and rehabilitation of Australian offenders.
Allan, A., & Dawson, D. ( 2004). Assessment of the risk of reoffending by Indigenous male violent and sexual offenders. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 280, 1-6.
2.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. ( 1995). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems .
3.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. ( 2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson .
4.
Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J.S. ( 2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment . Crime and Delinquency, 52, 7-27.
5.
Andrews, D.A., & Robinson, D. ( 1984). The Level of Supervision Inventory: Second Report . Toronto, Canada: Ministry of Correctional Services of Ontario.
6.
Arens, S.A., Durham, B., O’Keefe, M., Klebe, K., & Olene, S. ( 1996). Psychometric properties of Colorado substance abuse assessment instruments. Unpublished manuscript.
7.
Blanchette, K. ( 2002). Classifying female offenders for effective intervention: Application of the case-based principles of risk and need. Forum on Corrections Research, 9, 31-35.
8.
Bloomfield, E., & Steiger, W.L. ( 1983). Least Absolute Deviations: Theory, Applications, and Algorithms. Boston, MABirkhäuserBoston.
9.
Bonta, J. ( 1989) Native inmates: Institutional response, risk, and needs . Canadian Journal of Criminology, 31, 49 -62.
10.
Bonta, J. ( 2007). Offender risk assessment and sentencing. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 49, 519-529.
11.
Bonta, J., & Andrews, D.A. ( 2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Ottawa, Canada: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada.
12.
Bonta, J., & Motiuk, L.L. ( 1985). Utilization of an interview-based classification instrument: A study of correctional halfway houses. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 333-352.
13.
Bonta, J., & Motiuk, L.L. ( 1990). Classification to halfway houses: A quasi-experimental evaluation. Criminology, 28, 497-506. Bonta, J. & L.L. Motiuk (1992). Inmate classification. Journal of Criminal Justice , 20, 343-353.
14.
Browne, M.W. ( 1984). Asymptoically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62-83.
15.
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. ( 1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Byrne, M.K., Bryne, S., Hillman, K., & Stanley, E. ( 2001). Offender risk and need assessment: Some current issues and suggestions. Behaviour Change, 18, 18-27.
17.
Child, D. ( 1990). The essential factor analysis (2nd ed.). London, UK: Cassel Educational .
18.
Costello, A.B., & Osborne, J.W. ( 2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1-9.
19.
Coulson, G., Ilacqua, G., Nutbrown, V., Giulekas, D., & Cudjoe, F. ( 1996). Predictive utility of the LSI for incarcerated female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 426-439.
20.
Dahl, K.-P. ( 2006). Strengths and limitations of actuarial prediction of criminal reoffence in a German prison sample: A comparative study of LSI-R, HCR-20 and PCL-R. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry , 29, 431-442.
21.
Daly, K. ( 1992). Women’s pathway to felony court: Feminist theories of lawbreaking and problems of representation. Southern California Review of Law and Women’s Studies, 2, 11-52.
22.
Flores, A.W., Lowenkamp, C.T., Smith, P., & Latessa, E. ( 2006). Validating the Level of Service Inventory-Revised on a sample of federal probationers. Federal Probation, 70, 44-48.
23.
Folsom, J., & Atkinson, J.L. (2007). The generalizability of the LSI-R and the CAT to the prediction of recidivism in female offenders . Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1044-1056.
24.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. ( 2002). Is the PCL-R really the "unparalleled" measure of offender risk? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 397-426.
25.
Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. ( 1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!Criminology, 34, 575-607.
26.
Gentry, A.L., Dulmus, C.N., & Theriot, M.T. ( 2005). Comparing sex offender risk classification using the Static 99 and the LSI-R assessment instrument. Research on Social Work Practice, 15, 557-563.
27.
Girard, L., & Wormith, J.S. ( 2004). The predictive validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Ontario Revision on general and violent recidivism among various offender groups. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 150-181.
Hanson, K., & Harris, A. ( 2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual assault recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 27, 6-35.
30.
Hollin, C., & Palmer, E.J. ( 2003). Level of Service Inventory-Revised profiles of violent and non-violent prisoners. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 18, 1075-1086.
31.
Hollin, C., & Palmer, E.J. ( 2006). Criminogenic need and women offenders: A critique of the literature. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 179-195.
32.
Hollin, C., Palmer, E.J., & Clark, D. ( 2003). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised profile of English prisoners: A needs analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 30, 422-440.
33.
Holsinger, A.M., Lowenkamp, C.T., & Latessa, E.J. ( 2003). Ethnicity, gender and the Level of Service Inventory- Revised. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 309-320.
34.
Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S. ( 1989). Applied logistic regression. New York, NY: Wiley.
35.
Howell, D.C. ( 2007). Fundamental statistics for the behavioural sciences (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadworth.
36.
Hsu, C., Caputi, P., & Byrne, M.K. ( 2009). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R): A useful risk assessment measure for Australian offenders?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 728-740.
37.
Hsu, C., Caputi, P., & Byrne, M.K. ( 2010). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R): Assessing the risk and need characteristics of Australian Indigenous offenders . Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 17, 355-367.
38.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. ( 1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1-55.
39.
Jaccard, J., & Becker, M.A. ( 2002). Statistics for the behavioural sciences (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
40.
Kelly, C.E., & Welsh, W.N. ( 2008). The predictive validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised for drug-involved offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 35, 819-831.
41.
Kennedy, S.M. ( 2000). Treatment responsivity: Reducing recidivism by enhancing treatment effectiveness. Forum on Corrections Research , 12, 19-23.
42.
Kroner, D.G., & Mills, J.F. ( 2001). The accuracy of five risk appraisal instruments in predicting institutional misconduct and new convictions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 471-489.
43.
Langan, N.P. & Pelissier, B.M.M. ( 2001). Gender differences among prisoners in drug treatment . Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 291-301.
44.
Lowenkamp, C.T., Holsinger, A.M., & Latessa, E.J. ( 2001). Risk/need assessment, offender classification, and the role of child abuse. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 28, 543-563.
45.
Loza, W., & Simourd, D.J. ( 1994). Psychometric evaluation of the Level of Service Inventory (LSI) among male Canadian federal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 468-480.
46.
Marsh, H.W., Balla, J.R., & Hau, K.T. ( 1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indexes: A classification of mathematical and empirical properties. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modelling techniques (pp. 315-353). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
47.
Maurutto, P., & Hannah-Moffat, K. (2006). Assembling risk and the restructuring of penal control. British Journal of Criminology , 46, 438-454.
48.
McDonald, R.P. ( 1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49.
McDonald, R.P., & Ahlawat, K.S. ( 1974). Difficulty factors in binary data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 82-99.
50.
Mihailides, S., Jude, B., & Bossche, E. V. d. (2005). The LSI-R in an Australian setting: Implications for risk/needs decision-making in forensic contexts . Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12, 207-217.
51.
Mills, J.F., Jones, M.N., & Kroner, D.G. ( 2005). An examination of the generalizability of the LSI-R and VRAG probability bins. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 32, 565-585.
Nagy, M.S. ( 2002). Using a single-item approach to measure facet job satisfaction . Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 77-86.
55.
Nee, C., & Ellis, T. ( 2005). Treating offending children: What works? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 133-148.
56.
Nunnally, J.C. ( 1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill .
57.
Ogloff, J.R.P., & Davis, M.R. ( 2004). Advances in offender assessment and rehabilitation: Contributions of the risk-needs-responsivity approach. Psychology Crime and Law, 10, 229-242.
58.
Palmer, E.J., & Hollin, C. ( 2007). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised with English women prisoners: A needs and reconviction analyses. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 971-984.
59.
Parry, C.D., & McArdle, J.J. ( 1991). An applied comparison of methods for least-squares factor analysis of dichotomous variables. Applied Psychological Measurement , 15, 35-46.
60.
Reisig, M.D., Holtfreter, K., & Morash, M. ( 2006). Assessing recidivism risk across female pathways to crime . Justice Quarterly23, 384-405.
61.
Rugge, T. ( 2006). Risk assessment of male Aboriginal offenders: A 2006 perspective. Ottawa, Canada: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
62.
Schlager, M.D., & Simourd, D.J. ( 2007). Validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) among African American and Hispanic male offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 545-554.
63.
Simourd, D.J. ( 2004). Use of dynamic risk/need assessment instrument among long term incarcerated offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 31, 306-323.
64.
Simourd, D.J., & Malcolm, P.B. ( 1998). Reliability and validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised among federally incarcerated offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 261-274.
Taxman, F.S., & Thanner, M. ( 2006). Risk, need, and responsivity (RNR): It all depends . Crime and Delinquency, 52, 28-51.
67.
Wanous, J.P., Reichers, A.E., & Hudy, M.J. ( 1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single item measures ? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247-252.
68.
Whiteacre, K.W. ( 2006). Testing the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) for racial/ethnic bias. Criminal Justice Policy Review , 17, 330-342.
