This study examined to what extent the significance of both static and dynamic risk factors for recidivism changes in the course of adolescence. For this purpose, file and interview data of 1,396 juveniles charged with a criminal offense were analyzed. This study showed that the impact of almost all dynamic risk factors decreased as juveniles grew older. As a result, the predictive power of risk assessment models also decreased. From age 14, dynamic risk factors did not contribute significantly to the prediction of recidivism over static risk factors. Another consequence of the declining importance of dynamic risk factors is that the potential effect of an intervention aimed at these factors will also decrease as adolescents grow older, which indicates the importance of early intervention.
Aegisdottir, S., White, M.J., Spengler, P.M., Maugherman, A.S., Anderson, L.A., Cook, R.S., . . . Cohen, G. ( 2006). The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction . The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 341-382.
2.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. ( 2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson .
3.
Barnoski, R. ( 2004). Assessing risk for re-offense: Validating the Washington State Juvenile Court Assessment. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
4.
Bishop, M.A., & Trout, J.D. ( 2002). 50 years of successful predictive modeling should be enough: Lessons for philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science , 69, S197-S208.
5.
Breuk, R.E., Clauser, C.A.C., Stams, G.J.J.M., Slot, N.W., & Doreleijers, T.A.H. (2007). The validity of questionnaire self-report of psychopathology and parent-child relationship quality in juvenile delinquents with psychiatric disorders. Journal of Adolescence , 30, 761-771.1.
6.
Deković, M., & Asscher, J.J. ( 2008). Interventies voor jongeren die antisociaal gedrag vertonen: Kenmerken, werkzame mechanismen en moderatoren, van effectiviteit [Interventions for youth who exhibit antisocial behavior: Features, effective mechanisms, and moderators of effectiveness]. Den Haag , Netherlands: Research and Documentation Centre of the Ministry of Justice.
7.
Deković, M., & Prinzie, P. ( 2008). De rol Van het gezin in de ontwikkeling van antisociaal gedrag [The role of the family in the development of antisocial behavior] . In I. Weijers & C. Eliaerts (Eds.), Jeugdcriminologie Achtergronden van Jeugdcriminaliteit [Youth criminology: The context of juvenile delinquency] . (pp. 143-161). Den Haag, Netherlands: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
8.
Dolan, M., & Doyle, M. ( 2000). Violence risk prediction: Clinical and actuarial measures and the role of the Psychopathy Checklist. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 303-311.
9.
Doreleijers, T.A.H., Bijl, B., Veldt, M.C., & Van der Loosbroek, E. (1999). BARO: Standaardisatie en protocollering basisonderzoek strafzaken Raad voor de Kinderbescherming [BARO: Standardization and protocols of the investigation of the Council of Child Care and Protection]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: VU University Amsterdam/The Netherlands Institute for Care and Welfare Press.
10.
Douglas, K.S., & Skeem, J.L. ( 2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 347-383.
11.
Farmer, E.M.Z., Compton, S.M., Burns, B.J., & Robertson, E. ( 2002). Review of the evidence base for treatment of childhood psychotherapy: Externalizing disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 1267-1302.
12.
Farrington, D.P. ( 1986). Age and crime. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice (pp. 29-90). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Holmbeck, G.N., Greenley, R.N., & Franks, E.A. ( 2003). Developmental issues and considerations in research and practice. In A. E. Kazdin & J. R. Weisz (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (pp. 21-41). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
Howell, J.C. ( 2003). Diffusing research into practice using the comprehensive strategy for serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1, 219-245.
15.
Laub, J.J., & Sampson, R.J. ( 2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys up to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Loeber, R., DeLamatre, M., Keenan, K., & Zhang, Q. ( 1998). A prospective replication of developmental pathways in disruptive and delinquent behavior. In R. Cairns, L. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 185-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Loeber, R., Slot, N.W., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2006). A three-dimensional, cumulative developmental model of serious delinquency. In P-O. H. Wikström & R. J. Sampson (Eds.), The explanation of crime: Context, mechanisms and development (pp. 153-194). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Loeber, R., Slot, N.W., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2008). A cumulative developmental model of risk and promotive factors. In R. Loeber, H. M. Koot, N. W. Slot, P. H. Van der Laan, & M. Hoeve (Eds.), Tomorrow’s criminals: The development of child delinquency and effective interventions (pp. 133-161). Hampshire, England: Ashgate.
19.
Moffitt, T.E. ( 1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
20.
Mossman, D. ( 1994). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 62, 783-792.
21.
Orbis Partners. ( 2007). Long-term validation of the Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument (YASI) in New York State juvenile probation. Ottawa, Canada: Author.
22.
Prinzie, P., Hoeve, M., & Stams, G.J.J.M. (2008). Family processes, parent and child personality characteristics. In R. Loeber, H. M. Koot, N. W. Slot, P. H. Van der Laan, & M. Hoeve (Eds.), Tomorrow’s criminals: The development of child delinquency and effective interventions (pp. 91-102). Hampshire, England: Ashgate.
23.
Sampson, R.J., & Laub, J.H. ( 1992). Crime and deviance in the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 63-84.
24.
Sampson, R.J., & Laub, J.H. ( 1997). A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. In T. P. Thornberry (Ed.), Developmental theories of crime and delinquency: Advances in criminological theory (pp. 133-161). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
25.
Schwalbe, C.S. ( 2007). Risk assessment for juvenile justice: A meta-analysis . Law and Human Behavior, 31, 449-462.
26.
Shapiro, D.E. ( 1999). The interpretation of diagnostics tests. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 113-134.
27.
Spaander, M. ( 2003). Handleiding BARO [Manual BARO]. Utrecht , Netherlands: Raad voor de Kinderbescherming .
28.
Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Loeber, R., Wei, E., Farrington, D.P., & Wikström, P-O. H. (2002). Risk and promotive effects in the explanation of persistent serious delinquency in boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 11-23.
29.
Van der Knaap, L.M., & Alberda, D.L. ( 2009). De predictieve validiteit van de Recidive Inschattingsschalen (RISc) [Predictive validity of the Recidivism Risk Assessment Scales (RISc)] . Den Haag, Netherlands: Boom Juridische Uitgevers/Research and Documentation Centre of the Ministry of Justice.
30.
Van der Laan, A.M., & Blom, M. ( 2006). Jeugddelinquentie: Risico’s en bescherming [Juvenile delinquency: Risk and protection]. Den Haag, Netherlands: Boom Juridische Uitgevers/ Research and Documentation Centre of the Ministry of Justice.
31.
Van der Put, C.E., & Spanjaard, H. ( 2009). Handleiding WSJCPA-NL-2009 [Manual WSJCPA-NL-2009] . Amsterdam, Netherlands: Universiteit Van Amsterdam /Pedagogical Institute Research.
32.
Van der Put, C.E., Stams, G.J.J.M., Van der Laan, P.H., & Oort, F.J. ( 2009). WSJCPA-NL-2009. De Nederlandse versie van de Washington State Juvenile Court Prescreen Assessment [WSJCPA-NL-2009. The Dutch version of the Washington State Juvenile Court Prescreen Assessment] . Amsterdam, Netherlands: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
33.
Wartna, B.S.J., & Tollenaar. N. ( 2006). Recidive 1997-2003. Ontwikkelingen in het niveau van de strafrechtelijke recidive van jeugdige en volwassen daders [Recidivism 1997-2003. Developments in the level of the criminal recidivism of juvenile and adult offenders]. Den Haag, Netherlands: Research and Documentation Centre of the Ministry of Justice.
34.
Weijers, I. ( 2008). De adolescent [The adolescent]. In I. Weijers & C. Eliaerts (Eds.), Jeugdcriminologie [Youth criminology] (pp. 71-83). Den Haag, Netherlands: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
35.
Weijters, G., Vinke, A., Van der Logt, M., & Gerris, J.R.M. (2004). Gezin, vriendengroep en school als predictoren van delinquent gedrag: Vergelijking tussen jonge en oudere adolescenten [Family, friends, and school as predictors of delinquent behavior: Comparison between young and older adolescents]. In J. R. M. Gerris (Ed.), Jeugdzorg en probleemgedrag: Opvoedingswaarden en vernieuwingen in aanpak [Youth care and problem behavior: Parental values and changes in approach] (pp. 9-22). Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
36.
Welsh, J.L., Schmidt, F., McKinnon, L., Chattha, H.K., & Meyers, J.R. ( 2008). A comparative study of adolescent risk assessment instruments: Predictive and incremental validity. Assessment , 15, 104-115.
37.
Wilcox, D.T., Beech, A.R., Markall, H., & Blacker, J. ( 2009). Actuarial risk assessment and recidivism in a sample of UK intellectually disabled sexual offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15, 97-106.
