The authors investigated the efficacy of static versus dynamic approaches to risk assessment and the validity of the Risk Principle through comparing treatment changes made by high- versus lower-risk offenders. The investigations were carried out using a sample of 321 treated sex offenders followed up for an average 10 years postrelease. Risk was assessed using the Static 99, and treatment change was assessed using the Violence Risk Scale—Sexual Offender version. Actuarially high-risk/ low-change offenders had significantly higher rates of sexual recidivism than similarly high-risk offenders who had demonstrated greater treatment changes. The Static 99 predicted sexual recidivism well among sex offenders with smaller treatment change but demonstrated weaker prediction among offenders with greater treatment change, likely owing, in part, to the static nature of the risk predictors. Implications regarding the dynamic nature of risk and potential utility of incorporating treatment change—related information into sex offender risk assessments are discussed.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. ( 2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson .
2.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. ( 2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice . Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 16, 39-55.
3.
Andrews, D.A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R.D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F.T. ( 1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically-relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
4.
Barrett, M., Wilson, R.J., & Long, C. ( 2003). Measuring motivation to change in sexual offenders from institutional intake to community treatment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 269-283.
5.
Beggs, S.M., & Grace, R.C. ( 2010). Assessment of dynamic risk factors: An independent validation study of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender Version. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 234-251.
6.
Beggs, S.M. ( 2008). Study 2: Measuring treatment outcome for child molesters. A comparative validity study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Canterbury, Christchurch , New Zealand.
7.
Doren, D.M. ( 1998). Recidivism base rates, predictions of sex offender recidivism, and the "sexual predator" commitment laws. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 97-114.
8.
Douglas, K., & Skeem, J. ( 2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 347-383.
9.
Dowden, C., & Andrews, D.A. ( 2000). Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42, 449-476.
10.
Gordon, A., & Wong, S.C.P. ( 2010). Offense analogue behaviours as indicator of criminogenic need and treatment progress. In M. Daffern , L. Jones, & J. Shine (Ed.), Offence paralleling behaviour: An individualized approach to offender assessment and treatment. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
11.
Haag, A.M. ( 2005). Do psychological interventions impact on actuarial measures: An analysis of the predictive validity of the Static 99 and Static 2002 on a reconviction measure of sexual recidivism (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
12.
Hanson, R.K. ( 1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism. User Report No. 1997-04. Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
13.
Hanson, R.K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. ( 2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 36, 865-891.
14.
Hanson, R.K., Harris, A.J.R., Scott, T., & Helmus, L. ( 2007). Assessing the risk of sex offenders on community supervision (User Report No.2007-05). Ottawa, ON: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
15.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K.E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies . Psychological Assessment, 21, 1-21.
16.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. ( 1999). Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (User Report 99-02). Ottawa, ON: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
17.
Hogue, T. ( 1994). Goal attainment scaling: A measure of clinical impact and risk assessment. Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology , 21, 96-102.
18.
Howell, D.C. ( 2002). Statistical methods for psychology (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth .
19.
Hudson, S.M., Wales, D.S., Bakker, L., & Ward, T. ( 2002). Dynamic risk factors: The Kia Marama evaluation . Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 103-119.
20.
Kraemer, H.C., Kazdin, A.E., Offord, D.R., Kessler, R.C., Jensen, P.S., & Kupfer, D.J. ( 1997). Coming to terms with the terms of risk. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 337-343.
21.
Looman, J., Abracen, J., Serin, R., & Marquis, P. ( 2005). Psychopathy, treatment change, and recidivism in high-risk, high-need sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 20, 549-568.
22.
Nunes, K.L., & Cortoni, F. ( 2008). Dropout from sex offender treatment and dimensions of risk of sexual recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 35, 24-33.
23.
Olver, M.E., & Wong, S.C.P. (in press). Assessing sexual violence risk and evaluating change with the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version. In H. Hobberman & A. Phenix (Ed.), Sexual offenders: Diagnosis, risk assessment and management. New York, NY: Springer.
24.
Olver, M.E., & Wong, S. C. P. (2009). Therapeutic responses of psychopathic sexual offenders: Treatment attrition, therapeutic change, and long-term recidivism . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 328-336.
25.
Olver, M.E., Wong, S.C.P., & Nicholaichuk, T. (2009). Outcome evaluation of a high intensity sex offender treatment program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 522-536.
26.
Olver, M.E., Wong, S.C.P., Nicholaichuk, T., & Gordon, A. ( 2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change . Psychological Assessment, 19, 318-329.
27.
Prochaska, J.O., DiClemente, C.C., & Norcross, J.C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to the addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47, 1102-1114.
28.
Quinsey, V.L., Rice, M.E., & Harris, G.T. ( 1995). Actuarial prediction of sexual recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 85-105.
29.
Serin, R., & Kennedy, S. ( 1997). Treatment readiness and responsivity: Contributing to effective correctional programming (Research Report No. 1997-54). Ottawa, ON: Correctional Service of Canada.
30.
Studer, L.H., & Reddon, J.R. ( 1998). Treatment may change risk prediction for sexual offenders . Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment , 10, 175-181.
31.
Wong, S., Olver, M.E., Nicholaichuk, T.P., & Gordon, A. ( 2003). The Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender version (VRS-SO) . Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
32.
Wong, S.C.P., & Gordon, A.E. ( 2006). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale: A treatment-friendly violence risk assessment tool. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12(3), 279-309.
33.
Wormith, J.S., & Olver, M.E. ( 2002). Offender treatment attrition and its relationship with risk, responsivity, and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 29, 447-471.
